[c-nsp] clear module config

Is there a way to clear the configuration of a module AFTER it has been removed from a 6500/7600 chassis? 7609#clear module ? ContentSwitchingModule Clear CSM SLB module information csg Clear CSG information pc-module Clear PC module information prov

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

> We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed > by the CPU usage Check the archives from earlier this year, subject "7200 / NPE-G2": http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-April/03.html ___ cisco-nsp mailin

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:13:28PM +0200, Philippe Strauss wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Christophe Fillot wrote: > > Philippe Strauss a ?crit : > > > > Hello, > > > > >We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed > > >by the CPU usage: this router swit

Re: [c-nsp] LR over MMF

> I have a very temporary need to bring up a 10g circuit > between 2 cages in a data-center. I have some MMF in place I > could use but the distance is over 300m so SX won't quite cut > it. 10Gbase-LX4 will very likely work just fine, though unsupported. Have you tried that? -A _

[c-nsp] Weird behaviour of recent XENPAKs in Cat6500-SXF

Hi all, we've run into weird problems with recent XENPAKs on Cat6509 platform running 12.2(18)SXF10. These are: - XENPAK is not recognized when plugged into shutdown port. However, after "no shut" XENPAK comes online and passes traffic fine - it is not possible to turn off the laser ouput. C

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco noob -- design guidance request

Hi, On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Niels Bakker wrote: > I assume you'll be selling these people Internet access. If they get 172.16-Addresses, he's not selling Internet access... SCNR. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [c-nsp] [Fwd: FWSM 3.1 and Servers with redundant cards]

The source IP does not changing in the return flow, only the interface the packet returns on, in your case its returning on DMZ_1, not DMZ_2. >From your logs you can see the IP is still 192.168.2.1. Deny TCP (no connection) from 192.168.2.1/23 to 10.10.10.140/9244 flags SYN ACK on interface DMZ

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:15:45PM +0200, Christophe Fillot wrote: > Philippe Strauss a écrit : > > Hello, > > >We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed > >by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it > >was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the

Re: [c-nsp] Multiple T1 IMA / Channelized DS3

Does the Telco Systems EdgeLink100 T1/E1 include an A/B side for redundant DC power? I couldn't discern that from the spec sheet. We've been recommended (and installed) the Adtran series of products. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 58, Issue 4

Hi, Did you have problem with SUP720 recently (hardware failure)? Last semester there was 3 problems. I am wondering if any series are having problem. Tks, Alaerte ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/li

[c-nsp] Issues with NIC teams on Unix and ESX servers

Hi, We have recently migrated two of 6513 in our datacenter to Native IOS from catos. They were with catos 7 sup 2, msfc with 12.1 and now ios 12.2(18)sxf10. After the change we got strange issues with a Unix and ESX server. Sw1 and sw2 (6513 s) connected with etherchannel trunk and HSRP configu

Re: [c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

Philippe Strauss a écrit : Hello, > Hello, > > We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed > by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it > was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU clock is more that > 4 time higher on the G2. > > currently ru

[c-nsp] cpu usage of a 7200 npe-g2: disapointed

Hello, We replaced a 7200 NPE400 with a NPE-G2 recently and are disapointed by the CPU usage: this router switches ~80kPPS in+out (~180Mbps), it was peaking at 55% CPU, now 40%, while the CPU clock is more that 4 time higher on the G2. currently running: c7200p-p-mz.122-31.SB7.bin was running 12.

Re: [c-nsp] ISP response and traffic billing for DDOS

On 3 Sep 2007, at 03:58, Hock Jim wrote: > Sorry for being slightly off-topic, but hoping to seek some advise on > what is typically the case for ISP response in the case of a DDOS. its fine but check out nanog which is more Internet operational than here.. > In the case of a DDOS attack that

Re: [c-nsp] QoS - questions

(I'm not the original poster) On 8/21/07, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Usually you don't want to provision more than 50% of your BW for LLQ. > Experience has shown that this can introduce some delay.. I have a recurring scenario in which the customers want one symmetric

Re: [c-nsp] Router Suggestion for console access?

Paul Stewart wrote: > Looking for feedback on what still works well for console access via a > router dial-up? > > We have quite a few sites that have several routers/switches/access devices > all of which have console/serial connections on them We'd like to be > able to dial-up to a router o

Re: [c-nsp] [Fwd: FWSM 3.1 and Servers with redundant cards]

Thank you for your replies! The problem is not so much the asymmetric of the traffic but more the change of IP addresses source in the return flow: [IP_src:10.10.10.1,IP_dst:20.20.20.2]TCP/SYN>FWSM->20.20.20.2 X--FWSM<---TCP/SYN/ACK[IP_src: 20.20.20.1,IP_dst: 10.10.10.1] The ASA