From this post:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2006-August/032846.html
It appears that the magic number, assuming you've tweaked the TCAM
appropriately, is somewhere between 244736 to 245546 routes.
I'd be interested to see what (if anything) happens when that number is
reached.
As someone who works exclusively in a private network (albeit an 18K
site/45K route private network) can someone run through the reasons people
need the complete internet route table in quite so many places ?
Does everyone who is holding the full table have multiple upstreams ?
(presumably for
Natambu,
Maybe you should take a look at the 7600 platform?
Arie
On 10/26/07, Natambu Obleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to upgrade my backbone from OC-3 to OC-12. Is there a POS OC-12
card for the 72xx series? If I have to upgrade to 73xx or something then
I might as well look at
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Dean Smith wrote:
As someone who works exclusively in a private network (albeit an 18K
site/45K route private network) can someone run through the reasons people
need the complete internet route table in quite so many places ?
Does everyone who is holding the full table
I'm specifically talking about upstream traffic from the client, not
downstream from the HSRP routers. Downstream will always flow out the
active as expected.
Not always. The HSRP standby has an active connected route for the
subnet and will (may) export it via a routing protocol, so the
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:10 -0800, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:08 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
Is there a HSRP option to tell the standby router to only route traffic
when it's active? VRRP and GLBP would have the same problem
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:32:26AM -0400, Afsheen Bigdeli wrote:
From this post:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2006-August/032846.html
Don't believe that idiot ;-)
It appears that the magic number, assuming you've tweaked the TCAM
appropriately, is somewhere between 244736
Are you pinging with DF set?
Most PA-FE's I've seen only support an MTU of 1500 bytes.
Each device tends to also have a maximum packet size it can handle -
even after fragmentation. I've seen some cheap CPE not respond to pings
larger than about 8k.
Brad
Andy Dills wrote:
Ok, I have a
I am by no means a fiber expert, but I've been told by old school fiber
guys that the RX side is the best place to put them, as the attenuators
generate some back reflectance which is best to have as far away from
the TX of a GBIC/SFP as possible.
-evt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
One ugly way to do it would be to create an eem applet on both routers which
would do the following:
1) watch for syslog messages STANDBY Active-xxx and then decrease the
metric of these
redistributed connected routes through configuring the local router
2) watch for syslog messages
Phil Mayers wrote:
I'm specifically talking about upstream traffic from the client, not
downstream from the HSRP routers. Downstream will always flow out the
active as expected.
Not always. The HSRP standby has an active connected route for the
subnet and will (may) export it via a
In the load balancer I use (F5 BigIP) they allow you to asign a mac address to
you floating ip (which in this case woukd be hsrp) this mac is set up on both
units but only becomes active a gru--aprs the mac when the other ipaddress
dies this failover happens very fast. In this way only the
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
Cliff notes:
Is the inability to get ping replies with datagrams of larger than 9216
bytes across a 100mbps ethernet circuit an indication that the far end is
setup with an MTU consistent with jumbo frames?
What to do if the far end swears it's set for
This mturoute program may be helpful:
http://www.elifulkerson.com/projects/mturoute.php
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 12:20 PM
To: Andy Dills
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:10 -0800, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:08 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
Phil Mayers wrote:
Is there a HSRP option to tell the standby router to only route traffic
when it's active? VRRP and GLBP would have
Hi all,
On 10/28/07, Christopher E. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5 min later, the MAC entry times out, but the ARP entries are there for
another 4hr 55min... Now we have our layer2 network with no target for
that MAC and flooding everywhere.
(3hr 55min?)
I was tempted to start a new
I made need a (cost effective) bgp-capable router for a remote
deployment which would only need to announce -1- route and take in a
default route from -1- provider. Also needs to push 100Mbps of traffic.
A 3750 (EMI) can do this fine, right?
Otherwise, what else would I be looking at, a
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:31:45PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
Am I likely correct in my theory that something is configured for the
jumbo frame MTU and thus response packets aren't being properly
fragmented?
If something has an influence on this at all, it's the router on the
other side -
At 10:53 PM 10/27/2007, matthew zeier wrote:
I made need a (cost effective) bgp-capable router for a remote
deployment which would only need to announce -1- route and take in a
default route from -1- provider. Also needs to push 100Mbps of traffic.
A 3550 or 3750 can do what you require just
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007, matthew zeier wrote:
I made need a (cost effective) bgp-capable router for a remote
deployment which would only need to announce -1- route and take in a
default route from -1- provider. Also needs to push 100Mbps of traffic.
A 3750 (EMI) can do this fine, right?
20 matches
Mail list logo
