> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:05 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MTBF for Cisco products
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev man, 03 dec 2007:
> > Ted Mittelstaedt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will Hargrave
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:55 AM
> Cc: Cisco-nsp
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MTBF for Cisco products
>
>
> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>
> > (nor, in fact, for the additional money that the
It appears that WRED is not supposed on the WS-X6748-GE-TX...the
"random-detect" command is not listed.
The closest is "wrr-queue random-detect", but the queue id's match up to "1
for the standard low-priority queue, 2 is for the standard high-priority
queue, and 3 is for strict priority", and I'm
Is there a way to check a device to see if a reload has been scheduled
(i.e. reload at 23:00)? I thought that that would be an interesting
item to add to my monitoring system. I've grepped though the mibs
that I grabbed off of Cisco's FTP site and couldn't find anything
obvious.
Jeff
___
This would work for a peer that is in your ibgp mesh. Otherwise it
will likely not do what you intend.
Jared Mauch
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:18 PM, "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it protocol-wise allowed to configure a BGP confederation like
> this ?
>
> router(config)#router b
Is it protocol-wise allowed to configure a BGP confederation like this ?
router(config)#router bgp 65010
router(config-router)#bgp confederation identifier 42
router(config-router)#bgp confederation peers 42
router(config-router)#neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 42
Reading the RFC on BGP Confeds didn't
Here you go:
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tools/quickreference/index.html
Regards,
Juan
At 16:56 07/12/2007, Roy wrote:
>Up until recently Cisco had two very handy PDF files: One had the
>various routers and their expected PPS while the other covered switches.
>
>They
Anyone have any opinion on this? Pros? Cons? Experiences vs. other
vendors like Fortinet or Juniper, for example?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nethe
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Roy wrote:
> They have both disappeared from the Cisco site. Does anyone still have
> copies?
They disappeared, along with the PPS.
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Direct : +1-678-954-0671
__
At 02:56 PM 12/7/2007, Roy wrote:
>Up until recently Cisco had two very handy PDF files: One had the
>various routers and their expected PPS while the other covered switches.
>
>They have both disappeared from the Cisco site. Does anyone still have
>copies?
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/tool
Up until recently Cisco had two very handy PDF files: One had the
various routers and their expected PPS while the other covered switches.
They have both disappeared from the Cisco site. Does anyone still have
copies?
Roy
___
cisco-nsp mailing list c
Sorry I meant to say the 4mb 2924XL doesn't support dot1q
Pierre Lamy wrote:
> Turns out was because (as far as I can tell) the 2950 only supports
> dot1q and the 2924XL only supports ISL. Go figure
>
> Pierre
>
> Pierre Lamy wrote:
>
>> I'm getting a lot of Native VLAN mismatches between my 2
Turns out was because (as far as I can tell) the 2950 only supports
dot1q and the 2924XL only supports ISL. Go figure
Pierre
Pierre Lamy wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of Native VLAN mismatches between my 2950 and 2924s.
> This is due to the case difference on the 2 platforms, between VLAN1 and
>
> The only option I can think of here if for you to grant access to a
> userid that is allowed to run 'copy running-config
> tftp://aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd/upload/pix.cfg' where aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd is the IP
> of the authorized TFTP server on a secured portion of your LAN. That
I think that you could also u
Justin Shore wrote on 7/12/2007 5:26 μμ:
> Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
>>> Marc Haber wrote:
Which access privileges would RANCID need, and how far can the RANCID
account be restricted?
>>> The same as any user who is able to to a "
IMA?
/me hides
Joseph Jackson wrote:
> Would it be considered retarded to put 23 T1's into a multilink bundle?
>
>
> Joseph
> ___
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at htt
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
>> Marc Haber wrote:
>>> Which access privileges would RANCID need, and how far can the RANCID
>>> account be restricted?
>> The same as any user who is able to to a "sh run".
>
> Which access privileges are needed
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
>> Marc Haber wrote:
>>> Which access privileges would RANCID need, and how far can the RANCID
>>> account be restricted?
>> The same as any user who is able to to a "sh run".
>
> Which access privileges are needed
On 5 Dec 2007, at 17:33, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 12:06:54PM -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I believe that the PIX/ASA configuration can
>> be seen via the internal web server. It's encrypted via SSL, so a
>> wget should work, if it's compiled with SSL
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Is it possible to authenticate through a ssh key, and is it possible
> to restrict a key to be only accepted from one single IP address?
As far as I understand, currently Cisco does not understand this concept.
(And their SSH impl
Hi Bill,
Considering an interval of 0.25ms your calculation is fine for
the 8Mbps Be. Though such calculation leaves no margin and you
really want to have some to be sure the switch can sustain the
rate.
The switch might even inform you that your burst value is not
legal as the minimum configurab
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:03:39PM +, Thorsten Dahm wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote:
> > Which access privileges would RANCID need, and how far can the RANCID
> > account be restricted?
>
> The same as any user who is able to to a "sh run".
Which access privileges are needed to do a "sh run"?
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo
