Hi,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:36:29PM +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
Unfortunately, BFD on SVI is not currently supported...
Given the platform's architecture (everything is a SVI, even if you don't
see it right away) this smells like someone has been smoking particularily
bad weed...
Hello,
On 1/18/08, Alexandre Snarskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Hello,
Anybody knows what software supports MUX-UNI? All our 7600/SRBx can do
it, and none of our 6500/SXF6 can. Does any later SXF support MUX-UNI?
Or do we
I will be out of the office starting 18.01.2008 and will not return until
28.01.2008.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi all,
May be this is out of topic,
I'd like to know if HP network node manager can also provide high
level reporting.
Regards.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:07:16AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Hello,
Anybody knows what software supports MUX-UNI? All our 7600/SRBx can do
it, and none of our 6500/SXF6 can. Does any later SXF support MUX-UNI?
Or do we have to make the jump to SXH? Or SRA on 6500?
For me it works on
Hello, nsps.
Does anybody know a redundancy solution for ODAP address allocation server?
I mean how to configure two cisco boxes to be an address pool managers for
the same subnet allocation and to avoid conflicts?
Tnank you,
--
als
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi,
I have a vlan in my router's switchport, and I receive a link from other
company. Last week my network goes down. I analyze my network and saw a lot
of IS-IS packets. By the way, my routes inside this vlan are static. I've
tried to create an ACL inside my vlan to block these IS-IS packets
If you want to restart SNMP process on Cisco router, you can use commands as
listed below...
no snmp-server community whatever-it-is
snmp-server community whatever-it-is
by doing this you will have restarted snmp process :)
Why you want to restart SNMP process?
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
Not at all, it will be fine either way as they are grounded shielded cables.
I suspect the biggest nice thing about having the two lines bound together is
just the convenience of having the pair together, damn easy to trace. I have
many times had a major telco come and just put in two individual
I have been terminating DSL on my 7206vxr for quite some time. My router
began acting sluggish the last couple of days for some odd reason the cpu
was being pegged out. Below was what was in the logs non stop. I only have
5 DSL customers terminated to this router. In order for me to get the
Hey guys,
I've never had to pull our own DS3 coax cable before and I'm now faced with
it. It's no big deal, BUT in some of the Cisco documentation it recommends
that the 2 strands of coax be bound together with shrink wrap or something
like that. I'm using 75-ohm RG6 shielded coax with the
IS-IS is carried by OSI, not IP; you should try finding the ethertype
it's using (maybe 00FE or FEFE) and use a MAC ACL to filter the OSI
traffic.
Converting to an IP routerport without IS-IS attached would achieve
better isolation, is it possible on this scenario ? We strongly prefer
to use
May be this is out of topic,
What makes you think this would *not* be off-topic? :-)
Try the list next door, hp-nsp.
Vincent
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I would recheck the configuration of the port since you typically need to
explicitly enable ISIS on the interface.
Aaron
On Jan 18, 2008 9:49 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Agree with Rubens. If you absolutely need to run IS-IS on a Vlan where
you also have hosts which
Does anyone know if/how the snmp process can be restarted ?
Gabriel Mateiciuc
Academia de Studii Economice
Departamentul Reţele
Echipa Infrastructura
+40 (21) 3191900 x 122
+40 (21) 3191901 x 122
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Guys, I apologize if this is a lame-brain question but
I am new to MPLS...
We have a pretty simple MPLS VPN setup comprised of the following 3
routers:
PE1 -- P - PE2
PE2 is a new router we are transitioning customers to.
PE1 is 7206VXR 12.4(17)
PE2 is CAT6513/SUP720-3B 12.2(18)SXF12
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:17:56AM +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
Someday ago I was talking to one of my Juniper friend and he was saying that
you can't use one Cisco box as P and PE simultaneously though you can use
Juniper.
Vendor J marketing bullshit.
(Don't tell our routers that
What are you trying to accomplish exactly? If you want to use the BGP
routes as primary versus the IGP routes, you can set the
administrative distance higher for the IGP learned routes. Suppress-
inactive will keep the BGP peer from re-advertising those RIB-failure
routes to another
If the ultimate goal is no BGP rib-failure then yes. If the end
goal is to steer traffic a certain direction then that may or may not
be a proper solution. I don't have the whole scenario so I can't say
for sure.
Phil
On Jan 18, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Suzan S. wrote:
I think we will loose
Skeeve,
Looking to talk to someone regarding costs and timeframes of designing
and
implementing a MDS based solution in Sydney.
Contact me via email please at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
timeframes on MDS are always very quick. its typically 7 days lead
time, more commonly its in the range of 3 days.
Hi,
Considering the scenario, do you see a way to load balancing Layer 2 VPN
over MPLS (VPWS or old AtoM and VPLS?
(that is, one xconnect takes PE1-P1-PE2 and other takes PE1-P2-PE2)
CE-PE1-P1-PE2CE2
| | |
|__P2__|
Tks,
Alaerte
In my lab, which consists of 4 x 2600 series routers, I implemented a
little MPLS scenario such as the following:
PE1 PE2 P1 PE3
|||
TailsTailsTails
Each of the PEs are 2611's and the P is a 2621, all non XM.
So I guess I can say
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 00:17 +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
Someday ago I was talking to one of my Juniper friend and he was saying that
you can't use one Cisco box as P and PE simultaneously though you can use
Juniper. If it worked and work like a charm, please share your experience.
A P
It should work fine as long as the relay and filters are configured
properly. I'm writing the steps which works fine for me.
1. From the VPN Concentrator console, select Configuration System IP
Routing DHCP Relay. Select the Enabled check box to activate DHCP relay,
and enter the forwarding IP
Someday ago I was talking to one of my Juniper friend and he was saying that
you can't use one Cisco box as P and PE simultaneously though you can use
Juniper. If it worked and work like a charm, please share your experience.
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Drew Weaver wrote:
some of the interfaces that could be in said routers such as:
3GE-GBIC-SC (engine 2)
4OC12/POS-IR-SC-B(engine2)
Could suffer from a pretty iffy oversubscription issue:
How does a 4OC12 card get oversubscribed when the backplane interface is
OC48?
[snip] Except that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Voth
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:18 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Coax question for DS3
Hey guys,
I've never had to pull our own DS3 coax cable before and I'm now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Voth
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:18 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Coax question for DS3
Hey guys,
I've never had to pull our own DS3 coax cable before and I'm now
This is not the case, removing and reapplying the SNMP community string wont
reset the SNMP process. Even on the modular IOS attempting to restart the SNMP
process will take down additional core processes.
The answer that I got from my SE was no, clean SNMP process restart is not
possible.
If you are under a DoS attack and figure out that you are receiving too many
PADI packets, you can throttle them:
virtual-template 1
sessions per-mac throtlle...
cheers
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Masood Ahmad Shah
Enviada em:
Being that that ace appliance (combination of ace + application velocity
system) has JUST been released I doubt there will be much input outside
of a lab or POC environment.
That being said, I have played with it in the lab, and other then the
general gui suckage issues, I think it is pretty
you can test (SYN flood and ICMP) using hping www.hping.org. Whenever I
configure a firewall I always use this tool.
Hmm BGP testing I never come across this before. If you found one please
share.
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
PE1 to P is 100mb link which supports Jumbo frames no problem.
The 5500 also acts as a PE for a few of our COLO customers so It needs
to
Be running MPLS while I transition the WAN links from PE1 to PE2
Hope that makes sense..
Brandon Price
Sterling Communications Inc.
/31 --- The Subnet
Looking for feedback on the ACE appliance? Please post reviews and/or
experience with the product. I am in the process of evaluating a few different
vendors and was curious how real world experience has gone.
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
Let us say you were stuck with a set of routers for a finite set of time
which wasn’t adjustable no matter how much you cried about it. Let us say for
example that these were 12000 series routers and these particular 12000 series
routers could only use line cards which
What is the PE1 to P link? I would try very hard to not use the 5500
as a P router. Maybe MPLSoGRE would work? Or using the 5505 as a
bridge? If they are both Ethernet, then just trunk things through.
Phil
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Brandon Price wrote:
Guys, I apologize if this is
Realize your question was on the ACE appliance. However I have
implemented and worked with the ACE modules. They are a big step up from
the CSS in terms of performance. Configuration is very different than
CSS. SSL cert handling is still a royal pain though improved from CSS.
Has behaved
Nick Voth wrote:
Hey guys,
I've never had to pull our own DS3 coax cable before and I'm now faced with
it. It's no big deal, BUT in some of the Cisco documentation it recommends
that the 2 strands of coax be bound together with shrink wrap or something
like that. I'm using 75-ohm RG6
38 matches
Mail list logo