On Fri Feb 01, 2008 at 01:02:51PM +1030, Tom Storey wrote:
Did you turn on ipv6 unicast-routing? Though one would expect for a
connected subnet this should not matter.
Yes - that's turned on (otherwise you don't get an IPv6 routing table at all).
ipv6 cef might also be available. It is on my
Checking my own MLS NDE configurations, it looks very similar - *but*
I am not exporting to a VRF. So a possible issue could be that the PFC
export isn't VRF capable.
It isn't. Annoyingly.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
The OP has stated 12.4(15) but this release does not exist as a mainline
release, I can only assume that 12.4(15)T is intended (totally different
codebase).
In terms of 12.4(11)T though, note:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/ps6441/products_field_notice09186a008088cc2f.shtml
is
This is why on another listserv's short list of tools for techs to have, a
laptop with a real serial port was near the top of everyone's list. In our
workplace that's a requirement for any tech laptop we buy. We've wasted way
to much time installing drivers, recovering from blue screens and lock
VRF Aware NAT, performance question ..
I'm going to build a VRF Aware NAT solution, to place in front of our backup
system,
I tried to find some data sheets, that shows the performance numbers, when
using a 7201 (NPE-G2) ..
Have any one any experience with VRF Aware NAT on a 7201 ??
Best
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
This is why on another listserv's short list of tools for techs to have, a
laptop with a real serial port was near the top of everyone's list. In our
workplace that's a requirement for any tech laptop we buy. We've wasted way
to much time installing
Packets originating from the router can be controlled by:
ip local policy route-map name of the route map
One thing I would try, but I have no idea if it works, is policy
routing the traffic to a loopback interface that belongs to a VRF.
The netflow export address would be the one inside the VRF,
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Hi
Currently I am using an OpenBSD box which has given no problems, as a
router/firewall for some colocated systems.
However, I would like to take advantage of some of the Cisco features
like NBAR, and the FTP proxy code (systems needing FTP with the
OpenBSD
Adrian Minta wrote:
Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Hi
Currently I am using an OpenBSD box which has given no problems, as a
router/firewall for some colocated systems.
However, I would like to take advantage of some of the Cisco features
like NBAR, and the FTP proxy code (systems needing
pings to devices beyond the 2811 are losing every second attempt
Default, or other routing? None of the clients are advertising a default
route, or a route to the particular subnet you are trying to access are
they, perhaps creating a second path on the LNS which leads to a dead
end..
static routes are not supposed to be dynamic and bfd is not designed for static
routes.
dave
- Original Message
From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2008 7:47:08 AM
Subject: Re:
Gabor Ivanszky wrote:
Peter Rathlev wrote:
That makes sense. But our experience in a real life scenario is that
the partitioning of OSPF speaking transport network creates the
blackhole as well. I will try to build this in the lab. May the root
cause of the blackhole wasn't the network
Or maybe Cisco could just catch up with the rest of the world and do
away with serial ports seeing as it's difficult to get a laptop or PC
with a serial port built in.
Maybe just a local Ethernet port which has a hard coded IP address on it
that cannot be modified? Or an lcd display on your
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:20:18PM -0800, snort bsd wrote:
static routes are not supposed to be dynamic and bfd is not designed for
static routes.
Thanks for this incredibly helpful comment.
Please read up in the mailing list archives about real-world networks
and why bfd for static
Roddy Strachan wrote:
Hey guys,
Could be a long shot this question, but here goes anyway :).
Is there any simple way to monitor the backplane capacity of the 3560, 3750
series switches?
Something like an OID would be handy, or even a ^(3)sh^(2) command so I could
hack
up a script to
15 matches
Mail list logo
