Re: [c-nsp] SNMPv3 bug on 3550

Can someone please tell me how I can unsubscribe to this list. Many thanks Bret Kean Global Systems Engineer Global Investment Banking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone :Phone :+44 (0) 207 496 3754 Mobile :Mobile :+44 (0) 7771 838889 Level 12, Tower 42 25 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1HQ

Re: [c-nsp] Unsubscribing cisco-nsp (was: SNMPv3 bug on 3550)

Hi Bret, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 10:48 +0100, Bret Kean (brkean) wrote: Can someone please tell me how I can unsubscribe to this list. You can go to https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp and unsubscribe from there. You could also send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word

[c-nsp] 5063 support for RSVP-TE

Hi, Does CISCO support 5063 graceful restart of RSVP-TE Regards, Monika M. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Question about ip rtp header-compression

Hi Christopher, Excuse my ignorance, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean by If you are running a borrow enabled IOS What's a borrow IOS? The routers are both running c7200-spservicesk9-mz.124-11.T1.bin, one is a 7204VXR NPE300 and the other 7206VXR NPE300. I'll try your suggestion and

[c-nsp] Supervisor IV and support for IPv6

Hi We are testing IPv6 on our Cat 6509s/Sup720 but may be required to run IPv6 on Cat 4507Rs with Supervisor IV. As far as im aware IPv6 forwarding is only supported in software on the Supervisor IV does anyone know what sort of performance/throughput can be expected. The link I normally use for

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Hi, On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:55:46PM +0100, Robert Hass wrote: So, what causing Output drops on this card ? The output buffers of ports on this card are small (128Kbyte). So if you have bursty traffic coming in from lots of other ports, or from GigE ports, like 500 kbyte coming in from a

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Tell me, do you see drops on f1/2? I note you didn't paste show int for this. The reason I ask is that the drops *can* be as a result of policy (or lack of ability) as opposed to performance, from experience. For instance, you have STP BPDU filtering enabled on f1/1 and f1/48 but not f1/2, do

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Robert Hass wrote: Can I configure something to prevent this drops ? Or maybe I should replace this card with WS-X6148 will resolve my problem ? According to cisco docs, the per port buffers on the 6148 are no better. WS-X6548-RJ-45 has 1MB/port buffers. We had a 6500

Re: [c-nsp] mpls hub spoke.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: virendra rode // wrote on Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:53 PM: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there a way to find out whether a CE router (non-mpls) connection point between customer

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF router gets separated from a broadcast domain

Hi, It is not as difficult as you might think, imagine VPLS in between and incorrect LSP's setup :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher E. Brown Sent: maandag 4 februari 2008 5:14 To: Gabor Ivanszky Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] pix question

Raman Sud wrote: Show version will do the trick as well! Don't forget to prepend 88 to the output of the sh ver serial number. Ie, if sh ver says it's 81234567 then the actual SN is 8881234567. I went through that yesterday trying to figure out the SN of a 515E we're putting on a

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN tagging on the 2960

Some of the cisco switches have a global command like vlan dot1q tag native that tags native vlan traffic, not sure about the 2960. That would accomplish what you want. Phil On Feb 7, 2008, at 12:20 PM, Kiecker, Alan W wrote: I need to set up ports on a 2960-24TC-L so that outbound

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Gert Doering wrote: The 6148A model has 5.3MB of buffer per port whereas the plain 6148 only has 128KB. That might suit his needs too. Watch out. I think you're comparing 100Mbit modules with GigE modules. If I remember correctly, the 6148A is actually 6148A-GE-TX, while there is also

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Jon Lewis wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Robert Hass wrote: Can I configure something to prevent this drops ? Or maybe I should replace this card with WS-X6148 will resolve my problem ? According to cisco docs, the per port buffers on the 6148 are no better. WS-X6548-RJ-45 has 1MB/port

Re: [c-nsp] pix question

How far away are you from that device? Can't you just plug a console cable to it and check? Ziv -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 7:18 PM To: ultramajestic Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

On Feb 7, 2008 6:20 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gert Doering wrote: The 6148A model has 5.3MB of buffer per port whereas the plain 6148 only has 128KB. That might suit his needs too. Watch out. I think you're comparing 100Mbit modules with GigE modules. The 6148A 10/100

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

On Feb 7, 2008 6:20 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Baaah, a mere pittance. Nobody these days has anything less than a Sup720, right? :-) Well, not really. Sup32 is perfect for some places where you not need full-BGP table (PFC3BXL is not capable with Sup32) and only few Gig's of

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

On Feb 7, 2008 1:44 PM, David Freedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I note you didn't paste show int for this. No there is no drops, but on F1/2 there is minimum of traffic (1:100 comparing to Fa1/1 or Fa1/48). The reason I ask is that the drops *can* be as a result of policy (or lack of

Re: [c-nsp] WS-X6348-RJ-45 and Output drops

Peter Rathlev wrote: On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 09:35 -0600, Justin Shore wrote: I always make a point to use 6748s but that would be a waste of money given the Sup Robert has to work with. Literally a waste of money yes. The WS-X6700 cards won't boot up without a Sup720. :-) Really? I've

Re: [c-nsp] Packet Loss on PPPoE Sessions with 2811 LAC/LNS

Hrmm... I am dumb... The router was running 12.4-18. As soon as I ugraded it to 12.4(15)T3 it worked fine. Thanks everyone! Kurt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly Sent: Monday, 4 February 2008 00:55 To:

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

Thanks Hank, My Version is 12.3(13) a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan. Hank Nussbacher wrote: On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, a. rahman isnaini r.sutan wrote: Similar output : sh bgp s = sh bgp ipv6 summary Not on 12.2(18)SXF: petach-tikva-gp#sho bgp sum BGP router identifier xxx.139.220.91,

[c-nsp] 1800 + HWIC AP, sample config wep wpa enterprise?

I'm not finding Cisco's docs on setting up two SSIDs, one with WEP and one with WPA Enterprise (with an external RADIUS server), helpful. Does anyone have a sample config I can use as an example? My guest SSID is 40bit WEP. My inside SSID is WPA Enterprise off an external RADIUS.