What debug command is one to use to debug an outgoing ssh session from a
router? Something like -vvv.
Thanks,
Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hello,
I have a question regarding the HWIC-2SHDSL and HWIC-4SHDSL.
We are getting our leased lines as seperate 2-wire-lines over each of
which we establish a PPPoE-Sesson to our LNS. Now, some customers need
more bandwidth than one line can provide. Before, we have bundled the
lines with
Hi
I am sure I have read somewhere that there is a limit of 26 VRFs per router
when configuring VRF-lite (multi-VRF). Has anyone else seen this?
Regards
Gary
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
OTOH, 6500 gets software modularity, which is something that
we consider a *real* must for any decent high-availability
environment.
So, does anyone think IOS XE looks cool? Say, ISSU on a single
hardware RP, for example. Well, I do. And it's from the same BU
* A. L. M. Buxey:
for a firewall, not sending an RST for a denied connection, isn´t it
the Right Thing to do?
ah, the perennial DROP or REJECT question.
Not really. Faking the RST with the address of the target doesn't
give you any hint what's rejected the connection attempt. I know that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:28 AM
To: 'Cisco-nsp'
Subject: [c-nsp] ONSs, DWDM SFPs, and the 3560/3750E
So I'm working on a solution involving a pair of 15454s to transport
Hi list
I was wondering if somebody has had the chance to play with the new
ASR? From the introduction of ESP it's suppose to terminate 8000
subscribers on ESP5 and 16000 on ESP10, (32000 on ESP20)?
Has somebody had the chance to actually test PPPoE termination
performance on this box? e.g.
This is for 3750ME. 1 vrf per port, 24 FE and 2 Enhanced GE.
Eugene Vedistchev
Gary Roberton wrote:
Hi
I am sure I have read somewhere that there is a limit of 26 VRFs per router
when configuring VRF-lite (multi-VRF). Has anyone else seen this?
Regards
Gary
Thanks for the reply, Eric.
Eric Van Tol wrote:
I was in the same boat for the past year, so I feel your pain!
It doesn't sound like you are using dark fiber if your fiber is passing
through your provier's electronics. You're not going to be able to run DWDM
over a lit pair that's handed
Hi,
(directly to Ed and Cc to list due to the original beeing quite old,
feel free to reply to the list only)
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:23:20PM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
A few times on this list, people have discussed how a Cisco 1700 series
router can suddenly freeze up on its main Ethernet
-Original Message-
From: Justin Shore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:12 AM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: 'Cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ONSs, DWDM SFPs, and the 3560/3750E
Thanks for the reply, Eric.
I should have given more detail in my post. We're the ILEC
The story so far:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:23:20PM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
A few times on this list, people have discussed how a Cisco 1700 series
router can suddenly freeze up on its main Ethernet interface. The
problem as I've observed it hits routers that have a single Ethernet
interface
I will be out of the office starting 07/04/2008 and will not return until
14/04/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail contains proprietary information some or all of which may be
legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an
Hi Ed,
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:10:38AM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Andre Beck wrote:
Sadly I've came to know this bug in the last months as well.
...
I was seeing this with a 7206/IO-FE that *has* other interfaces, though
what seemed to trigger it
On Monday 07 April 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Honestly, I don't mean to sound too combative, but Cisco
do not need to be diversifying at this point; they need
to be focussing.
Agree...
IOS, IOS XR, IOS XE, NX-OS, CatOS, along with the various
idiosyncrasies of each (and their *children*) does
I know this is old stuff, but it still works for this small network here, so
what the heck.
I have a Cat4006 chasis, which had a Sup2 running of course CatOS, and then I
had a WS-X4604-AGM installed in it which routed my T1 line back to main
location. The unit was running 8.4(11)GLX for
Thanks.
Is there a martrix available anywhere showing limitations ?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Eugene Vedistchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is for 3750ME. 1 vrf per port, 24 FE and 2 Enhanced GE.
Eugene Vedistchev
Gary Roberton wrote:
Hi
I am sure I have read somewhere that
Also, if you ever want to buy a non-Cisco router for your network, you
can't since you now run EIGRP.
Which is a strong argument indeed.
OTOH, EIGRP *is* a fairly nice protocol - easy to understand and debug,
much nicer knobs to tweak for TE things (make this link bad for *this*
We can't moan about IOS deficienciesand also moan when Cisco take the
opportunity of fundamentally new hardware to fundamentally re-architect the
software to fix those problems.
I like many I suspect have been suffering recently. They don't seem to be
able to add a feature (or even fix a bug)
Hello Justin:
I am responding to your original post after reading your comments about owning
the fiber. My comments are in line below.
So I'm working on a solution involving a pair of 15454s to transport
numerous GigE links between a pair of sites over diverse paths and
still
give us a 10G
Hello everyone,
I'm looking to solicit some input from others that are using the Cisco
CSM, in particular, service providers that are using it to host layer
4-7 switching for customers. The archives don't seem to have a ton of
opinions on these guys.
In general, I like the device's performance
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:10:38AM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
The story so far:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:23:20PM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
A few times on this list, people have discussed how a Cisco 1700 series
router can suddenly freeze up on its main Ethernet interface. The
problem as I've
btw, you forgot ION (aka Modularize IOS) ;-)
I to dont mean to sound like I am on the attack on Cisco but I, like many of
you, have been continuaously bitten by the need to upgrade and upgrade just
to fix my first upgrade if you follow me. I will say that the different IOS
idiosyncrasies and OS
Many thanks for the reply, Michael.
Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
The filters are put in place between your 15454 and your one-pair uplink.
So, something like this:
15454 - Lambda 1 \
- Lambda 2 - Filter (muxes wavelengths) - outbound fiber
- Lambda 3 /
And then
Last I knew, the CSM was on its way out and being replaced with the ACE
blade/appliance. That's not quite the answer to the question you asked
but it does address the long term viability issue. I don't believe you
should be looking at the CSM as a long-term solution. If it's in place
and working
Hello Justin:
More in line below.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Shore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:26 PM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ONSs, DWDM SFPs, and the 3560/3750E
Many thanks for the reply, Michael.
From: Ramcharan, Vijay A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:30:17 +
To: Ross Vandegrift [EMAIL PROTECTED], cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Conversation: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CSM for service providers
Last I knew, the CSM was on its way out and
Did a followup email ever come out from Joseph Jackson?
--
Regards,
Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
From: Christoph Loibl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I vote for traceroute as one of the top tools (if not the topmost
tool).
Stoffi
Hi There,
Trying to make calls from a POTS do VOIP in SIP setup in attach, calls
from POTS are not beeing forwarded to VoIP port.
Can any one help
Pedro Wiliamo Matusse
Telecomunicações de Moçambique (TDM)
DSI
Tel. +258 21 482820
Cell. +258 82 3080780
Fax: +258 21 487812
sh run
Building
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:30:17PM +, Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
Last I knew, the CSM was on its way out and being replaced with the ACE
blade/appliance. That's not quite the answer to the question you asked
but it does address the long term viability issue. I don't believe you
should be
I've been running the CSM for about the year and a half I've been at the
service provider I work for. I like the fact that it's pretty scalable and
that you can be multiple L2 hops down the line and build it out however
you like, and every port in the chassis is a load balanced capable port... I
Hey Guys,
Forgive the dumb question, I'm not much of a Cisco security guy... I
have a 5510 I need to put in transparent mode and I want it to sit in the
middle of a dot1q trunk and filter traffic for the 4 VLANs traversing the
trunk between the two switches. What is the best way to do this?
Hi Everyone,
Just a few quick questions regarding ERSPAN and Wireshark. I have a lab
setup to test this functionality out (two 6509E's with Sup720-3B,
12.2(18)SXF11) however with a laptop connected to the destination mirror
port with Wireshark running, I was unable to see any traffic. Just
Hi Nick,
Just a shot in the dark, but did you remember the no shutdown command
under the monitor configuration? The start in admin disabled state.
We have no problems running ERSPAN. You need supervisor HW version 3.2
(IIRC) by the way. We have some 3 year old cards that are HW version
2.1, and
Hi Guys,
I have a question that I simply cannot find an answer to on the Cisco site
in regards to the CSM in Bridge mode.
Is it possible to have the vserver (VIP) IP in a differnt subnet range than
the real IP addresses in the serverfarm that is bound to it?
In other words, as an example a
As a p.s. to this post - does anyone know if the ASR has ISG on the
roadmap? I've found zero mention of ISG with regards to the ASR (which
does limit its use in DSL aggregation).
Brad
MKS wrote:
Hi list
I was wondering if somebody has had the chance to play with the new
ASR? From the
Hi group. I came across some mention of VPLS support for the 7200VXR on
Feature Navigator with the 12.2(33)SRB/C IOS. I'm just curious what
kind of VPLS support is available for this platform? I know it can do
EoMPLS fairly easily but can it actually do site to multi-site
configurations? I
On switch B, the source IP needs to be 192.168.200.1. Yeah, it makes no
sense but it works.
Geyer, Nick wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Just a few quick questions regarding ERSPAN and Wireshark. I have a lab
setup to test this functionality out (two 6509E's with Sup720-3B,
12.2(18)SXF11)
Is EIGRP multiprotocol?
Yes, and no.
Cisco says yes mostly because ... well, just because it can route for IP,
IPv6, IPX, AppleTalk.
Some argue that point and insist that the fact that it runs as multiple
independent processes (protocol depended modules) means it is closer to a
ships in the
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Jose wrote:
Hi group. I came across some mention of VPLS support for
the 7200VXR on Feature Navigator with the 12.2(33)SRB/C
IOS. I'm just curious what kind of VPLS support is
available for this platform? I know it can do EoMPLS
fairly easily but can it actually
Yes, I do this all the time...
Chris
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Brad Case [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have a question that I simply cannot find an answer to on the Cisco site
in regards to the CSM in Bridge mode.
Is it possible to have the vserver (VIP) IP in a differnt subnet
ISG and SBC both have embedded support on the ASR, look forward to
seeing some test results :)
Ben
On 08/04/2008, at 9:23 AM, Brad Gould wrote:
As a p.s. to this post - does anyone know if the ASR has ISG on the
roadmap? I've found zero mention of ISG with regards to the ASR
(which
If you haven't already, try posting this in the cisco-voip mailing
list, they are very active, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben
On 08/04/2008, at 6:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi There,
Trying to make calls from a POTS do VOIP in SIP setup in attach, calls
from POTS are not
Hi Peter,
Definitely did a no shutdown on the session and it was showing as up.
When the interface is in a monitoring state, I assume the interface
counters still increment as per normal? Was getting 0pps on the
destination interface, but the source interface was doing ~550pps.
Will also try
Hey Chris,
Thanks for the reply,
Have you ever seen any documentation for this type of configuration on the
cisco website?
Regards,
Brad
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Chris Riling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I do this all the time...
Chris
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Brad
I have configured 31 vrf's on 6500's (sup720's) with no problem before.
The 26 vrf limitation maybe specific to other hardware though.
--
Colin McNamara
(858)208-8105
CCIE #18233,RHCE,GCIH
http://www.colinmcnamara.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/colinmcnamara
The difficult we do immediately,
Hi,
I have a requirement of implementing standby(HSRP) for 6509 with two 3750s
(each with 12 SFP ports) one 3550(2 Gigabit 48 Fast Ethernet Ports). I
have stacked 3750s as a single unit. This is taking care of my SVI HSRP
requirement. I want to make 3550 also part of the 3750 stack, so it can
The Sup720 is good for 1024 vrf's, the limitation is in the number of
routes it can hold, which will vary on memory.
On 08/04/2008, at 12:21 PM, Colin McNamara wrote:
I have configured 31 vrf's on 6500's (sup720's) with no problem
before.
The 26 vrf limitation maybe specific to other
48 matches
Mail list logo
