Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
4. What are the "best practice" commands to watch memory usage ?
Set up some kind of NMS, at least something like cricket or the likes,
and plot memory usage over time ... from our experience, memory use
should stay relatively constant unless there are confi
The box says you have 128M of memory so why doubt it. As far as
accounting. there are all sorts of pools allocated and you need to
include the memory taken by IOS itself.
Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
We have a:
Cisco 7204VXR (NPE200) processor (revision B) with 114688K/16384K bytes
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a:
>
>Cisco 7204VXR (NPE200) processor (revision B) with 114688K/16384K bytes of
> memory.
>
> We are loosing our EIGRP neighbour adjaceny due to exhausting our memory usage
> (i think): e.g.
>
>EIGRP: Retransmission re
Hi all,
We have a:
Cisco 7204VXR (NPE200) processor (revision B) with 114688K/16384K bytes of
memory.
We are loosing our EIGRP neighbour adjaceny due to exhausting our memory usage
(i think): e.g.
EIGRP: Retransmission retry limit exceeded
Jun 17 15:57:39 atm-router 11682: Jun 17 15:5
To answer your main questions.
1. Is OAL really going to help me that much?
There are two benefits of OAL.
1. OAL improves performance from traditional logging which is done at
process level, by around 10 folks, with processing done at interrupt level.
So, you probably can expec
Is anyone out there using OAL? It seems very easy to implement but I’d
appreciate any feedback about your experience implementing this.
I have a 6509 with Sup720/MSFC3 and PFC3B and am not yet using OAL.
I have about 30 VLANs with low/negligible traffic volume.
I have 4 high volume VLANs wi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:31 +0100
> From: Timothy Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GRE/MPLS
> To: Ozgur Guler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PRO
Hello!
I have a question about WDM which is maybe offtopic here but I do not
know any better place to ask.
Is it possible to connect DWDM transceivers (XENPAK for instance) to
CWDM MUXes on both sides of 10Km optical fiber, assuming that wavelength
of DWDM transceiver is in the middle of a p
Howdy,
We're about to pick up a few new routers and we're leaning towards the GSR
12410s mainly because of familiarity and how much success we've had with our
other ones, we were just curious as if anyone has heard of a time line to Cisco
either EOL'ing these rou
I have the same thing with PPPoE clients on a 7206VXR with
c7200-is-mz.122-26.bin and the "clear int" doesn't work for me, either. I
was told by members on this listerv to run 12.2(31)SB11. ;)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlo M
Hello
I'm working with a 7206 loaded with c7200p-js-mz.122-31.SB11.bin and
I've noticed some virtual-access that are "blank".
Vi5 PPPoATM 22:58:00
Vi6 PPPoATM 4d05h
Vi7 PPPoATM 08:37:54
I get nothing...
Logging is enabled correctly for all debug messages.
I’ve checked the entire label switch path and everything looks normal. I don’t
see any difference between a CPE connected using an FE interface and a CPE
connected via a GRE tunnel. The former just works
Thanks
Tim
F
Hi Tim,
Is it possible to test it on the 7600 after enabling debug mpls packet?
Cheers
-Ozgur
--- On Tue, 24/6/08, Timothy Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Timothy Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GRE/MPLS
To: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
Date: Tuesday, 24 June, 2008, 2
>This definitely sounds label-related - 'regular' routing works, but
>anything requiring label imposition doesn't.
The plot thickens.
I've introduced a 7301 as the tunnel concentrator so it looks like this
CPE---PE(7301)---PE1---PE2---FIREWALL
(appreciate that PE1 is now a 'P' router as it is
Sorry for the late reply ... Nick's "ip local policy route-map" suggestion was
exactly what I needed. Thanks!
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Nick Griffin
To: Adam Greene
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PBR noob ques
Hi Aaron,
>Try adding 'tunnel vrf XXX' as well.
>Everything I have read mentions that this command defines which routing
>table the router will use to reach the 'tunnel destination', but I had
>similar symptoms to you (one way traffic) and this fixed me right up...
The GRE tunnel should use the g
Hi Tim,
>Is the FE interface with the tunnel destination *just* running vanilla IP,
>or also label-switching?
On the CPE, it is vanilla IP. The CPE is not aware of any label switching. The
PE tunnel is using a loopback interface (which we use for management) and
doesn't have label switching tur
Hi Tim,
Sounds a bit like what I hit about a week ago,
> interface Tunnel1
> ip vrf forwarding XXX
> ip address 172.31.255.45 255.255.255.252
> ip mtu 1460
> tunnel source Loopback0
> tunnel destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> end
Try adding 'tunnel vrf XXX' as well.
Everything I have read mention
Hi Tim,
On Tue, June 24, 2008 10:30 am, Timothy Arnold wrote:
> PE1/PE2 are 7600s with RSP-720s running 12.2(33)SRC. CPEs are 1841s with
> 12.4(19b) and the advanced IP services feature pack.
>
> The CPE has a static default towards PE1 via the GRE tunnel. It has
> another route via the FE interf
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the response.
> What platform/software is the CPE and the PEs? Can you do a trace from
> the CPE and see at least PE1? Does the CPE use a static default towards
> PE1?
PE1/PE2 are 7600s with RSP-720s running 12.2(33)SRC. CPEs are 1841s with
12.4(19b) and the advanced IP ser
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:21 +0100, Timothy Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got to terminate a remote site in to a customer's VRF using a GRE
> tunnel. The tunnel comes up and I can ping across the tunnel and I can
> also reach other hosts in the same VRF on the PE router that the
> tunnel terminat
Tim Durack wrote:
I'm going to assume August 2009 so as not to be disappointed...
Yeah, but don't worry. *This* time it'll be all modular
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Hi,
I've got to terminate a remote site in to a customer's VRF using a GRE tunnel.
The tunnel comes up and I can ping across the tunnel and I can also reach other
hosts in the same VRF on the PE router that the tunnel terminates. However I
cannot reach any hosts on other PE routers. For example
%PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR: Faulty redundant power supply detected
Hey guys,
This is on a 3560G-24TS-S.
Does it mean the main power is faulty? Or the redundant power connector (to
the RPS) is Faulty?
Or does it mean the RPS is faulty?
I 'think' it means the DC Redundant Power Supply (not the main on
24 matches
Mail list logo
