Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 07:00:22PM -0700, Brian Spade wrote:
> Hi, adding back cisco-nsp
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > Can anyone explain why Cisco fails to support Netflow on the
> > > 3560 Catalyst switches?
> >
> > They did not build
Sam Hall wrote:
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/Catalyst_3550_switch_reloads_and_gives_the_%22EXPRESS_SETUP-6-CONFIG_IS_RESET%22_error_message_when_the_mode_button_is_pressed_for_a_longer_time_during_a_password_recovery
I ran into this problem a year or so back. Our cable guy h
Zahid Hassan wrote:
Dear All,
Does anyone know if there is any replacement module planned for WebVPN or
SSL VPN for the 6500 chassis ?
The current WebVPN Services Module is apparently already or will soon be
declared EOL/EOS.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps6
I'm asking about this.
I'll get back with you.
It's going to be in a 12.0(33)S rebuild for sure.
But I need to check back on what the 12008 decision
was...ie: only in 32S rebuilds?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:24:56PM -0700, Troy Beisigl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if the 32 bit ASN suppo
Hi, adding back cisco-nsp
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> > Can anyone explain why Cisco fails to support Netflow on the
> > 3560 Catalyst switches?
>
> They did not build the hardware to support it.
>
> One of the many feature/cost choices made on
Can anyone explain why Cisco fails to support Netflow on the 3560 Catalyst
switches?
/b
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Dear All,
Does anyone know if there is any replacement module planned for WebVPN or
SSL VPN for the 6500 chassis ?
The current WebVPN Services Module is apparently already or will soon be
declared EOL/EOS.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps6404/product_dat
a_sheet
The value represents the amount of time that has passed since the highest
recorded peak.
I don't know if this value rolls over or not. I don't think it does.
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arie,
Actually i was using "sh platform hardware capacity fabric" to see it t
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:58:09PM -0400, Jim McBurnett wrote:
> With only 1 exception I have seen..
> 29xx layer 2
> 3xxx / 45xx / 65xx layer3
>
> The exception is the 3500XL-- Layer 2..
Well, a 65xx with Sup1 or Sup2 and no MSFC is also L2 only...
And a 2948G-L3 is neither L2 or L3 (it's
With only 1 exception I have seen..
29xx layer 2
3xxx / 45xx / 65xx layer3
The exception is the 3500XL-- Layer 2..
Later,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of julien leroiso
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:39 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n
I already have the hardware and I am prepping for migration.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:57 AM
To: Gert Doering; Teller, Robert
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6509 ACE/FWSM Modules??
> > My
> > My plan is to collapse my core switch(3750), pix, and css devices into
> > two 6509's with the fwsm/ace/Gig-e modules. I am just trying to decide
> > the best way to segregate the internal lan and middle tier dmz's.
>
> Our experience with 6500/7600 and IOS support makes this look like a ba
I think the best solution here would be to look at deploying
OER/(now called PfR) for this.
I've never done it myself but have seen scenarios where it's
targeted at doing pretty much exactly what you are asking.
Rodney
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 06:44:03PM +0800, Yang Darren wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I
Arie,
Actually i was using "sh platform hardware capacity fabric" to see it through
the cli.
Still, my main concern is... should i stick to my 1st explanation or the 2nd
one?
--
Tassos
Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote on 29/7/2008 11:22 μμ:
Tasso,
Your analysis makes sense.
It seems that this O
Release notes for 12.2(18)SXF include the following under "Feature Set Guidelines
and Restrictions":
There are no 12.2SX boot loader images: none are required.
As expected, i didn't find any to download too.
Release notes for 12.2(33)SXH do not include the above statement.
As expected (!) i
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:59:35AM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Quick question for someone that's "been there done that" from someone
> who has said "I thought it would work" more often than I'd like :-)
>
> Can you get a full BGP feed (two peers) into a Sup2? with uRPF? Which
> RAM needs to be
Quick question for someone that's "been there done that" from someone
who has said "I thought it would work" more often than I'd like :-)
Can you get a full BGP feed (two peers) into a Sup2? with uRPF? Which
RAM needs to be upgraded?
I found out the hard way it won't fit into a SUP2/MSFC2/P
The router would proxy arp if it has a more specific route
out another interface.
But it's a hack and I would not design my network around it
working personally.
Rodney
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 01:05:12PM +0200, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Re:)
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Whisper) wrote:
>
> > There
Ah ha...so with the physical MTU (which please start using it over
mpls mtu) we picked up on that and adjusted the MRRU negotiated
value it appears.
Rodney
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 02:34:41PM +0800, Soon Kian wrote:
> Hi Rodney
>
> It's works! after changing physical interface MTU instead of u
Yep, the 2950 can have a maximum of 1 layer 3 interface active (I assume for
management).
If you have a Layer3 Vlan interface up, and try to bring a second one up, it
automatically disables the first. (Not that I've ever accidentally done that
and had to drive out to the chassis to console in
http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/Catalyst_3550_switch_reloads_and_gives_the_%22EXPRESS_SETUP-6-CONFIG_IS_RESET%22_error_message_when_the_mode_button_is_pressed_for_a_longer_time_during_a_password_recovery
Sam
Sam Hall
Robert Wiseman & Sons
Ext: 6655
Tel: +44 (0)1355 270655
[EM
or pfsense captive portal (easy to set up, cheaper than mikrotik)
or openwrt + chilispot (somewhat more difficult to set up, even cheaper yet)
---rob
"a. rahman isnaini r.sutan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mikrotik with Hotspot Profile... for cheaper &
Re:)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Whisper) wrote:
> There was a big discussion on this list about proxy-arp several months ago.
And I do suppose that's why I find proxy-arp quite suspicious, and why I
asked about someone having a different idea for a solution.
> Do a search for the forums that keep this
Hi All,
I have deployed six 1812-Router at Headquarter and Branch using DMVPN.
Recently, all sites add new line(ADSL 8M/640K). I want to use two lines at
the same time below...
1. one line transmit critical data(VoIP, Video Conference...), another
transmit normal data(Web)
2. When one line corru
Since it is PPPoE and IPSEC on the top then I would say play a little with
your MTU since IPSEC and PPPoE demand a chunk from it. Then you have to
consider the size of your encrypted packets. Do you do payload or datagram
encryption (mode)?
A really good way I recently tuned an IPSEC tunnel was wi
Mikrotik with Hotspot Profile... for cheaper & fast solution
rgs
a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan
Jonathan Charles wrote:
Cust has access points open to public, they need to hijack the web
requests and take them a web page where they enter a security code,
and then allow them... So, I need to
The 2950 switch is a Layer 2 switch, and does not do any Layer 3 switching.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:43 AM, julien leroiso
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry the title should be : 2950 L3 ?
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:38 AM, julien leroiso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> can someone con
Sorry the title should be : 2950 L3 ?
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:38 AM, julien leroiso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi
>
> can someone confirm me that 2950 do or don't do L3 ?
> I'll need to configure many vlan gateway on, but I don't remember if I can
> do it on that device.
>
> thx
>
Hi
can someone confirm me that 2950 do or don't do L3 ?
I'll need to configure many vlan gateway on, but I don't remember if I can
do it on that device.
thx
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/c
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:40:25PM -0700, Teller, Robert wrote:
> My plan is to collapse my core switch(3750), pix, and css devices into
> two 6509's with the fwsm/ace/Gig-e modules. I am just trying to decide
> the best way to segregate the internal lan and middle tier dmz's.
Our experience
I am going for a collapsed core design and using 4948's for top of rack access.
From: Mike Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/29/2008 7:56 PM
To: Teller, Robert; Tony Varriale; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6509 ACE/FWSM Modules??
31 matches
Mail list logo