Sergio,
is PE2 really adjacent to PE1? I don't think it is, there must be some
LDP speaker in the middle. If PE2 was adjacent to PE1, the outgoing
label for 150.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.1/32 would be imp-null (aka "pop
label" as those networks are directly connected on PE1), not 18 or 20,
as you've ind
Taken from here:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20080516-rootkits.shtml
"For those customers whose www.cisco.com account does not provide access to the
Cisco IOS Upgrade Planner tool and hence cannot obtain the Cisco calculated,
known-good MD5 hash value for a given Cisco IOS soft
Dear.
In my network, The usersA cannot see the multicast application smoothly
at worktime, but at rest time, it's smoothly. The usersB can see the
multicast application smoothly any time. what's the possible cause?
Please help me, Thanks!
Source(vlan10)
|
|
Anyone,
Is there a central place to find MD5 hashes for IOS images, other
than going through the process of getting to the point of almost
downloading each image? We're thinking about implementing processes to
verify image integrity, have about 40 or so different images we use
currently on a
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Joe Loiacono wrote:
PS - Should I worry (alot) about being at or slightly above the 40 Km
distance?
That depends on the test results on your fiber span. If the fiber is
clean, of high quality, and well-spliced, then there could be a little
'slop' in the loss budget. At
If this is just a satellite location, I would try to avoid BGP unless
absolutely necessary. Maybe OSPF can meet your needs for this and then you can
inject routes as needed.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Burba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Loiacono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
It will do fine until you won't try to upload full view or try to serve more
then 10-15 downlinks, i suppose.
2008/8/12 Joe Loiacono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We have a requirement for about 2+ GE between two metro locations. I'm
> looking at the 3750-E with 2 X2 10GE uplink ports. I would use the
>
We have a requirement for about 2+ GE between two metro locations. I'm
looking at the 3750-E with 2 X2 10GE uplink ports. I would use the
10GBASE-ER X2 Transceiver Module for the distance. Actually the distance
is about at the 40 Km limit - but that's another question. Want to do BGP
with a lim
I've worked with different vendors "TAC"/Support and it would be fair to
admit that there is a world of difference between the support i get from
Cisco and other vendors. Within TAC information is openly shared and comes
in quickly whether its a bug or else, while with others, i will have to wait
t
Hi Nimal,
Check you processor / memory utilisation & check that all traffic is being CEF
switched:
sh proc cpu
sh proc cpu history
sh mem
sh switching
If traffic is being CEF switched and your CPU is running very high, you may
consider upgrading your NPE - btw. what NPE do you have in that r
This maybe of some value:
PE1#show mpls ldp bindings advertisement-acls
Advertisement spec:
Prefix acl = 1
tib entry: 1.1.1.0/30, rev 26
tib entry: 1.1.1.4/30, rev 27
tib entry: 10.0.0.1/32, rev 33
Advert acl(s): Prefix acl 1
tib entry: 10.0.0.2/32, rev 34
Advert a
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Alastair Johnson <> wrote on Monday, August 11, 2008 12:56 PM:
e.g. if I have ref BW = 100G, and a P-C with 2 10GE links, it should
be metric = 5.
If one 10GE link disappears from the bundle, do I have metric = 10?
yes, the bandwidth on the port-channel inter
Oli,
from a neighbor a hop away:
PE2#show mpls ldp bindings 10.0.0.1 32
tib entry: 10.0.0.1/32, rev 10
local binding: tag: 17
remote binding: tsr: 25.25.25.25:0, tag: 20
PE2#
prefix I want to filter:
PE2#show mpls forwarding-table 150.0.0.1
Local OutgoingPrefix
On (2008-08-11 20:30 +1000), Lincoln Dale wrote:
> you could potentially do it using CoPP policy with a CoPP policy for the
> address(es) you wish, 0bps configured for other rates.
OP was about doing it w/o ACL, CoPP would violate that rule.
> if its just telnet, then certainly an access-cl
Sergio,
your config looks fine, so I don't know what's happening. Can you show a
"show mpls ldp bindings 10.0.0.1 32" on the LDP neighbor(s) or a "show
mpls forwarding interface " where is the neighbor's interface
to PE1?
No need to specify a "to " to select which neighbors you want to
advertise
Hi Antal,
Is that a workaround for a specific bug?
Usually the IP MTU defaults to the MTU. You can check them with "show
int" vs "show ip int".
If the TCP session is between directly connected IPs, a TCP MSS equal to
40 byte less than the IP MTU is used.
In other cases (e.g. peerings betw
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Bård Dahlmo wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Just a warning, there is a fatal crash bug in SXH3 related to using
SCP. Considering the release notes claim fixes in that very area,
this is highly amusing (note: issue
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Bård Dahlmo wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Just a warning, there is a fatal crash bug in SXH3 related to using SCP.
Considering the release notes claim fixes in that very area, this is
highly amusing (note: issue may not actually be amus
We're using Lantronix here for the same purpose
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rens
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 9:01 AM
To: 'Justin Shore'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console access via cell phone
I fou
thanks for the response.
I am using 12.3(22) and "no mpls ldp advertise-labels" turns into "no
tag-switching advertise-tags" which I already have.
Oliver,
thanks for clearing up the assignment of the label, I guess thats fine as
long as it doesn't get advertised which is what I am trying to avoid.
Jay Nakamura wrote:
Datagrams (max data segment is 536 bytes):
put a "ip mtu 1500" on the wan interface.
its not the same as mtu
--
Antal GERGELY
Backbone Network Department
IP Services
DIGI KFT
Budapest Vaci ut 35.
H-1134
Hungary
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
Forgot to cc the list on this earlier email.
Paul Cosgrove wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Indeed it is apparently more than that: Jay mentioned receiving 20,000
routes before he sees the issue, so I guess about 75%. I had similar
thoughts about this but wasn't (and still am not) sure how frequently in
pr
Hi Jay,
PMTUD is not working here. You can see from the command output that a
TCP MSS of 536 bytes is being used rather than the expected 1440 bytes:
> Datagrams (max data segment is 536 bytes):
This limits the size of BGP packets, requiring more to be sent and so
increasing the load on the
12.4 mainline seems pretty mature at this point. I've got a 2821 doing
full tables from 2 upstrems over Ethernet, running 12.4(19), been solid
for months, running prefix lists, heavy QOS, and a few other things.
Unless you really need a feature from a 'T' train (or hardware support),
you're usuall
**While I am at it, I noticed 12.4 line IOS for 28xx is MD release.
Which, cisco's link doesn't tell you what that means. I know GD, ED,
etc releases but wasn't sure what MD relase meant. Mainline deployment?
Here's a good read - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_IOS
Mainline deployments are u
To answer couple people's questions,
MTU on the routers are 1500. I have tested with ping and df-bit set.
Provider has higher frame size to cover that MTU over the WAN link and our
switches that connects to them on both ends have higher frame size. (1526
frame size or higher)
While I am at it,
Bård Dahlmo wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Just a warning, there is a fatal crash bug in SXH3 related to using
SCP. Considering the release notes claim fixes in that very area, this
is highly amusing (note: issue may not actually be amusing)
CSCsr86489
Nice. TAC case has be
Can you provide any system stats? What is the CPU and memory looking
like...if something appears to be off it could indicate a code-level
issue.
Jeff Cartier
Applied Computer Solutions
(519) 944-4300 ext. 233
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Phil Mayers wrote:
Just a warning, there is a fatal crash bug in SXH3 related to using SCP.
Considering the release notes claim fixes in that very area, this is highly
amusing (note: issue may not actually be amusing)
CSCsr86489
--
Bård Dahlmo
Hi Rubens,
Thanks for the answer, do you have any doc or url for the information below?
-rendo-
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It depends on whether the policy route will be only processed by the
> SUP/RSP-720 or not.
>
> Although the following te
Oh, yeah. Sorry, I didn't catch the 'WAN' part of it the first time.
That does make MTU a possibility. But didn't he get like 20% of his
routes before the error message? Since it was 12.4(20)T (pretty
bleeding edge), I'd lean towards that still. I'd think that an MTU
problem would show up way b
I found a Siemens MC35i
But no luck so far getting it to work, anyone has experience with this?
-Original Message-
From: Justin Shore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 11 août 2008 14:46
To: Rens
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console access via cell phone
Rens w
Rens wrote:
Hi,
Is there any device that you can connect to the console port of a switch
that you can put a SIM card in?
So you can just dial to that number and have console access on the switch?
A couple of Avocent's console server product lines support PCMCIA
expansion cards including cell
Alastair Johnson <> wrote on Monday, August 11, 2008 12:56 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how IOS implements the OSPF reference
> bandwidth related to LAG interfaces.
>
> The only background material I can find on this is along the lines of:
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/techn
Google is your friend: http://www.google.com/search?q=gsm+modem+rs232
Best regards,
Stig Meireles Johansen
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Rens
Sendt: 11. august 2008 13:28
Til: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Emne: [c-nsp] Console access via c
Hi,
Is there any device that you can connect to the console port of a switch
that you can put a SIM card in?
So you can just dial to that number and have console access on the switch?
Regards,
Rens
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
Hi,
I am trying to understand how IOS implements the OSPF reference
bandwidth related to LAG interfaces.
The only background material I can find on this is along the lines of:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a0080094704.shtml#q3
Can anyone confirm whether L
Saku Ytti wrote:
Although question was protocol specific which makes
it hard to satisfy without ACLs. You could imagine
that the box may be offering NTP, DNS or TFTP to the
network which should continue to work.
you could potentially do it using CoPP policy with a CoPP policy for the
addre
Hi Sergio,
to add to what Oliver said that you maybe want to make sure
you have in the configuration a "no mpls ldp advertise-labels"
line. Without that, even if you configure a filter (which is
successfully matched as you shown), labels would still be
announced to adjacent LDP peers.
Don't know
On (2008-08-11 11:36 +0300), Joost greene wrote:
> Ok, i thought this is a feature i dont know about :)
>
> I guess the answer would be PBR with prefix-list.
Although question was protocol specific which makes
it hard to satisfy without ACLs. You could imagine
that the box may be offering NTP, D
Ok, i thought this is a feature i dont know about :)
I guess the answer would be PBR with prefix-list.
Thank you all.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Saku Ytti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> On (2008-08-11 11:13 +0300), Joost greene wrote:
>
> > I forgot to mention that the
Hi Chuck,
Jay will be able to clarify, but I took the following to mean that the
two are separated via third party infrastructure: "two 2851s connected
to each other over gigabit Ethernet WAN".
May well be a bug though.
Paul.
Church, Charles wrote:
Wasn't the original problem the iBGP conn
On (2008-08-11 11:13 +0300), Joost greene wrote:
> I forgot to mention that the question said to limit telnet access to
> loopback of two routers without using Access lists so i can see your answer
> makes sense but what do you mean by MPLS LSR ?
LSR = Label Switch(ing) Router. Essentially it's M
Hi Saku,
I forgot to mention that the question said to limit telnet access to
loopback of two routers without using Access lists so i can see your answer
makes sense but what do you mean by MPLS LSR ?
Thanks,
Joost
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Saku Ytti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
