[c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

Hi, I have a query regarding implementioan of 4 Byte AS on Cisco routers. Does any one implemented/tested 4 byte AS on Cisco routers? Cheers. Pratap. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

Thank you all ! Last night I did an upgrade to s6523-advipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SXH3 and now I have "clear ip arp x.x.x.x" switch#clear ip arp ? A.B.C.D IP address of dynamic ARP entry inspection Clear State of ARP Inspection ___ cisco-nsp mailin

Re: [c-nsp] XMODEM a native image to a 6500 Sup2 SP

"Church, Charles" wrote: > Honestly, just wondering if from Sup2 SP ROMMON: > > rommon 15 > xmodem -cs 38400 > [...] > will work if I upload a 52 MB 12.2SX image via XMODEM, or if it'll > blow up. I have done it, although I didn't use any higher spee

[c-nsp] OSM-2OC48/1DTP-SI

Does anyone have compatibility info and actual route handling capability for the OSM-2OC48/1DTP-SI card? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2831/products_data_sheet09186a0080088774.html The platform is a 6509 with Sup720-3BXL It looks like the card with 256MB should support a good

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Both will remain for SX releases as far as I know. Eventually only modular will be available, but that is still a while out. I believe once we start seeing Safe Harbor Modular releases we will be closer to that happening. David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [E

Re: [c-nsp] SXI on 6500 (was: SXH on 6500)

Robert, Updating this modular x monolithic thread to SXI, what's the current plan for SXI, modular only or both modular and non-modular ? Rubens On Tue, Oct 2, 2007 at 12:07 PM, Robert Crowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SXH was originally planned to be modular only, but a non-modular image was

[c-nsp] 1252ag backwards compatibility

Hello, I'm wondering if anyone that has deployed 802.11n 1252 AP's can tell me if you have 802.11g clients and some 802.11n clients all on 2.4ghz, do the 802.11n clients run at 802.11n and the 802.11g clients run at 802.11g? Or does everything run at 802.11g? Thanks, Dan. ___

Re: [c-nsp] Support for SIP-600

The SIP-600 is not supported by SXH. I believe SXI will support it again (don't have access to the secret decoder currently to confirm), but that is about a month out. David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

[c-nsp] Support for SIP-600

Can anyone verify if SXH and successors support the SIP-600 and corresponding 2xOC48 and 4xOC48 cards on the 6500 chassis. They are not listed in the release notes but the SIP-600 at least was supported in the SXF train with the 1xOC192 on the 6500 chassis. I hate changing chassis but it doesn't

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

There were some platforms like the 7500 where "no arp" in config mode did work for dynamic ARP entries. As I said, I haven't tested it on the ME6524, neither with SVIs or routed interfaces, neither with ZU2 or SXH IOS. An ARP entry associated with DHCP Snooping / Dynamic ARP Inspection / IP Sourc

Re: [c-nsp] XMODEM a native image to a 6500 Sup2 SP

Yep, I'm familiar with the Sup2 and the 64MB ATA card. We're neck deep in converting our 1400 hybrid ones to native. I'm just trying to write a doc that assumes a tech in a remote location only has a laptop with a serial port, the correct IOS image on his/her laptop, and a sup2 with a totally bla

Re: [c-nsp] XMODEM a native image to a 6500 Sup2 SP

> Use a PCMCIA to CF adapter and load the image using your PC My vague recollection is that you needed at least a later ROMMON (7.1(1)?) in your SUP2 for ATA disk support for either the disk flash card, or the CF/adapter(*). If you had an early ROMMON image, you could only use linear flash, w

Re: [c-nsp] XMODEM a native image to a 6500 Sup2 SP

Use a PCMCIA to CF adapter and load the image using your PC - we used these extensively and they worked well and were much cheaper than the flash cards plus with a laptop we could copy directly onto the CF no need for XMODEM/TFTP Church, Charles wrote: Does anyone know if it's possible to use

[c-nsp] XMODEM a native image to a 6500 Sup2 SP

Does anyone know if it's possible to use XMODEM from a 6500 Sup2's SP ROMMON to copy a native mode image (assume 12.2SX) and boot it successfully? I know it would take forever, just trying to update some documentation. All the docs on CCO seem to indicate that it can be used to copy a CatOS image

Re: [c-nsp] Console access via cell phone

Inbound calls are not supported on the 3g wic I last time I checked with TAC at least. Regards Kevin On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Luan M Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is interesting... > ONEBOX_Spoke3#show cellular 0/1/0 profile > Electronic Serial Number (ESN) = > Modem activated

Re: [c-nsp] Console access via cell phone

This is interesting... ONEBOX_Spoke3#show cellular 0/1/0 profile Electronic Serial Number (ESN) = Modem activated = YES Account Information: == Activation Date: Phone Number (MDN) : Mobile Station Identifier (MSID) : So if you configure the dialer interface to accept incomi

Re: [c-nsp] Console access via cell phone

Why not buy a cisco 1841 with 3G/2.5G HWIC? (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7272/index.html) Put in a SIM from a provider where you can get a public IP or have the 1841 tunnel out to you (via ipsec ez vpn client eg) to a place you can access it via. Dave. Rens wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is

Re: [c-nsp] Release notes for ISR ROMMON

Anyone? -Original Message- From: Church, Charles Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:51 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Release notes for ISR ROMMON Anyone know where to find the release notes for the various ROMMON versions for the 2800 and 3800 routers? Noticed 'DRAM access o

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

I see that makes sense. I will give it a shot. thanks for your help. On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > because this is how LDP works in frame-based MPLS networks. Every LDP > speakers independently allocates and distributes labels, so the P no

[c-nsp] SRC2?

Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically for the 7600. I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release. Thanks -- Chris Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Engineer - CCNP Phone: (352) 273-1051 CNS - Network Services

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Migration with ISIS (was Route Reflector Design)

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:25:56AM -0400, Vinny Abello wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson > > Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:42 AM > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 M

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

because this is how LDP works in frame-based MPLS networks. Every LDP speakers independently allocates and distributes labels, so the P node also allocates a label for the 150.0.0.0/24 and advertises it to PE2, no matter if the upstream neighbor (PE1) sent one or not.. oli Sergio D.

Re: [c-nsp] filter LDP bindings

Yes there is a "P" router in the middle. Why would the middle router be getting a binding if I am filtering from the source? On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sergio, > > is PE2 really adjacent to PE1? I don't think it is, there must be some

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

Justin, "no arp" in config mode should work for static entries only. -- Tassos Justin Shore wrote on 12/8/2008 4:17 μμ: The argument for clear arp-cache is an interface or null. 6524-2.brd#clear arp-cache ? interface Clear the entire ARP cache on the interface Ruben was correct with 'n

Re: [c-nsp] MD5 checksums for IOS images

Thanks guys. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:52 AM To: Phil Mayers Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Church, Charles Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MD5 checksums for IOS images Yeah, you're right...

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

The argument for clear arp-cache is an interface or null. 6524-2.brd#clear arp-cache ? interface Clear the entire ARP cache on the interface Ruben was correct with 'no arp ' from global config mode on that platform with the ZU code. Justin Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: "clear arp-cac

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: On some platforms, "conf t" +"no arp a.b.c.d" can do this, but I haven't tried it on ME6524. Is "clear arp interface " where is the interface where the arp entry is located won't probably be that hard, unlesss you have thousand of entries on that routed or SVI interface.

Re: [c-nsp] MD5 checksums for IOS images

Yeah, you're right... According to the name seems like the file is dated 2008 May 16th, but I didn't find a way to see a list of files so I can decide which one is the last updated one... -Original Message- From: Phil Mayers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 11:50

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

2008/8/12 Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "clear arp-cache x.x.x.x" should work. Just keep in mind that after doing > this, the local router will send an arp request to this mac. If it's still > active, a reply is sent back and the local arp table will be filled again > (you can chec

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

"clear arp-cache x.x.x.x" should work. Just keep in mind that after doing this, the local router will send an arp request to this mac. If it's still active, a reply is sent back and the local arp table will be filled again (you can check the "Age" counter). -- Tassos Adrian M wrote on 12/8/200

Re: [c-nsp] Crash bug in SXH3

Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:49:12AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > You can have them put the case in a state called > SW-RELEASE-PEND. Yeah, hooray. One of my cases is in that state since over a year :( gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Adrian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On some platforms, "conf t" +"no arp a.b.c.d" can do this, but I >> haven't tried it on ME6524. Is "clear arp interface " where >> is the interface where the arp entry is located won't probably be that >> hard, unlesss you hav

Re: [c-nsp] a multicast problem

Have you taken a look at this Cisco notice: http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/paws/68131/cat_multicast_prob.pdf and mitigated the IGMP snooping problem? David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com --- On Tue, 8/12/08, 田云生 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

> On some platforms, "conf t" +"no arp a.b.c.d" can do this, but I > haven't tried it on ME6524. Is "clear arp interface " where > is the interface where the arp entry is located won't probably be that > hard, unlesss you have thousand of entries on that routed or SVI > interface. "no arp a.b.c.

Re: [c-nsp] ME6500

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Adrian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I have a cisco ME-C6524GT-8S with software > s6523-advipservicesk9-mz.122-18.ZU2 and I don't know how to do some > basic things like: > > How to clear an arp entry > "clear ip arp 10.10.10.10" doesn't work :( On some p

[c-nsp] ME6500

Hello, I have a cisco ME-C6524GT-8S with software s6523-advipservicesk9-mz.122-18.ZU2 and I don't know how to do some basic things like: How to clear an arp entry "clear ip arp 10.10.10.10" doesn't work :( How to display mac learned on a routed subinterface "sh mac-address-table" don't display ma

[c-nsp] Ios slb and voip gateway

Hi all, we've a 6506 that is configured to do slb for a farm of some sip servers. My goal is to balance the traffic generated from our cisco voip gateway that send traffic to the virtual-ip of the farm. My problem is that the udp packets that are generated by the gateway are always sent from the sa

Re: [c-nsp] MD5 checksums for IOS images

This file can be found at http://www.cisco.com/web/tsweb/psirt/cisco-sr-20080516-rootkits.zip and contains Wow. Very nearly all IOS images; it's lacking very recent ones. That's probably one of the most useful links I've ever seen to the cisco web page. Shame their web server doesn't prope