howdy ho,
i am trying to get a CPE to
1) fire up a PPPoE session over an Ethernet interface to bring up a Dialer1
interface
2) over this interface, fire up 2 L2TP sessions (Virtual-PPP1 and
Virtual-PPP2 and put these in a multilink bundel)
The L2TP tunnels are terminating on 196.30.121.4
Can he add VLAN translation to the scenario ?
Rubens
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Fulton <> wrote on Sunday, August 31, 2008 2:03 AM:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm testing out VFI's in a lab, and I've run into the following when I
>> a
> My first issue is with VPLS, aside from requiring very expensive hardware,
> is it reliable enough for this? (we're the national telco, this will be
> carrying 999/911/112 calls)
Since you are designing the network ground-up, you can use whatever
fits best, and VPLS definitively isn't.
I think L
i saw issues with iBGP sessions...I kept receiving this messages for iBGP
sessions till I went back to my previous code.
*Aug 7 02:07:45: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 1/2 (illegal
header length) 2 bytes 1001
Thanks,
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Martin Moens <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I had the same issues with scrt and 20T, resolved it with the latest SCRT
(some 6.1. beta) and a manual change to an .ini file. After this change
SCRT works fine again with 20T.
I have seen issues with trace backs as well, I do not have the exact text at
hand, but each time I do a write after
Hi
The problem with SecurtCRT and 20T seems to be around the Key exchange.
What I did to solve this for me was to move diffie-hellman to be the
first key which fixed it.
I'm still not 100% confidant of 20T as well.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 03:28:18PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Brett Clausenhauf wrote:
>
> >Can anybody who might know advise? It would be very much appreciated..
>
> I had a similar issue back in SXE days (2+ years ago) where the conf-reg
> would get out of sync bet
The WS-X6724-SFP only has a single fabric connection:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product
_data_sheet0900aecd801459a7.html
" ** WS-X6724-SFP supports a single 20-Gbps channel connection to switch
fabric on Supervisor Engine 720; all other 67xx interface modules
Hi All,
This is quite a long query, but thanks in advance to anyone who reads it
and has some suggestions for me! :)
I'm currently working at an Island telco which is moving away from the
traditional centralised exchange + dslam + system-x model to a more
distributed model using VoIP and MSA
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Brett Clausenhauf wrote:
Can anybody who might know advise? It would be very much appreciated..
I had a similar issue back in SXE days (2+ years ago) where the conf-reg
would get out of sync between modules on the Sup720-3bxl (it would show
conf-reg 0x2102 in IOS, but re
Is there a way that you can off load the NAT to a router instead of
the 827 handling it?
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>> I'm currently running a 2621 just behind the 827(s) which is doing CEF
>> load distributi
You can check the config-register setting on SP by:
rem comm sw sh ver | i register
SP is probably still set to 2142. You should change it to 0x2102 by going to
config on RP. When you save the config it will be saved on SP also. After
saving you can issue:
rem comm sw sh ver | i register
It s
Hey Guys..
I have a query I cannot seem to find any answer too.
When a sup720 module is booting, if you do a CTRL + Break into rommon &
change the confreg register on the SP module (Changed to confreg 0x2142 &
NOT the RP module, what does this actually do? I did this by mistake whilst
troublesho
On Saturday 30 August 2008 17:03:43 Justin Shore wrote:
> I upgraded a 2811 to 20T the other night. I did another
> 2811 tonight after a different maintenance window. The
> routers are basically identical, except for the quantity
> of modules installed in them. I noticed the first night
> that
Stephen Fulton <> wrote on Sunday, August 31, 2008 2:03 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing out VFI's in a lab, and I've run into the following when I
> attempt to add a second VLAN to the VFI instance.
well, adding a 2nd SVI/Vlan to a VFI doesn't make sense (at least to
me), if you want to bridge bo
15 matches
Mail list logo