Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-19 Thread Terry Baranski
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 04:36:41AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: I am curious if anyone else uses conditional BGP as a poor man's DRP? Suppose you have site A with 192.168.1.0/24. The site is connected to 2 upstream ISPs and they have a number of servers at site A. They now create a DRP site

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-19 Thread Hank Nussbacher
At 09:47 PM 18-10-08 +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote: I am curious if anyone else uses conditional BGP as a poor man's DRP? Suppose you have site A with 192.168.1.0/24. The site is connected to 2 upstream ISPs and they have a number of servers at site A. They now create a DRP site (site B),

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM loading shuns

2008-10-19 Thread Oliver Gorwits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeff, Jeff Fitzwater wrote: Q. Has anybody found a way around this or even use SHUN? I thought that using the SHUN would be simpler than modifying an ACL, but it might be faster. We're probably not a representative user of the FWSM (for

Re: [c-nsp] NAT - SIP Problem

2008-10-19 Thread Ziv Leyes
The function ip nat piggyback-support can help you solve issues with SIP behind NAT But I don't think you'll be able to use it with your soho91 Read more about this here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/12_4t2/htsmpws.html Ziv -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-19 Thread Derick Winkworth
Do you see giants incrementing on either interface? Mohammed Dado wrote: Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs .. 128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1)

Re: [c-nsp] SCP bug in SXH3 i.e. CSCsr86489

2008-10-19 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Just FYI, the above bug (a catastrophic sup-crasher in SXH3) is not fixed in SXH3a. yup. SXH4 in mid november was the last whispers I heard alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-19 Thread Jay Hennigan
Hank Nussbacher wrote: At 09:47 PM 18-10-08 +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote: I am curious if anyone else uses conditional BGP as a poor man's DRP? Suppose you have site A with 192.168.1.0/24. The site is connected to 2 upstream ISPs and they have a number of servers at site A. They now

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-19 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Jay Hennigan wrote: Hank Nussbacher wrote: At 09:47 PM 18-10-08 +0500, Masood Ahmad Shah wrote: I am curious if anyone else uses conditional BGP as a poor man's DRP? Suppose you have site A with 192.168.1.0/24. The site is connected to 2 upstream ISPs and they have a

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-19 Thread Matt Carter
I've done something similiar, but went with what I perceived to be the somewhat less complex route of advertising the routes from both places at all times, but with AS Prepending and such so that Site A was always preferred when reachable. It worked well, and no DNS games required for