We've just tested it with channel-group 1 mode active.
The Sup comes back with no config on the Te Interface. But the other
4507 got no err-disabled state.
Works for us.
Thanks
Sebastian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Peter Rathlev schrieb:
Maybe running LACP on the link
Does anyone have any experience with a similar setup and can comment
on compatability between Cisco and Extreme?
one of our customers had repeated significant problems with running OSPF
(from L3 Cisco boxes) over Extreme Summit based L2 infrastructure. The
switches were multiplicating
Can you post the errdisable message?
You could possibly (if loops aren't the problem) disable the reason regarding
it.
Also, do you have errdisable recovery turned on?
--
Tassos
Sebastian Ganschow wrote on 14/11/2008 10:02:
We've just tested it with channel-group 1 mode active.
The Sup
First of all, thank you all for your insights.
If we were to go with the ASR track I guess I'd need both the 1002 chassis
item (18k USD list price) and the 5k USD IP BASE license aswell. Am I
understanding that correctly?
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today only seems to be
Can you post the errdisable message?
00:16:09: %EC-5-BUNDLE: Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/1 joined
port-channel Port-channel1
00:17:58: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on Po1,
putting Te3/1 in err-disable state
00:17:58: %EC-5-UNBUNDLE: Interface TenGigabitEthernet3/1
Good day
I have a CPU load problem on a 2610. The router has a X21 Serial
interface and Ethernet, and does simple WAN routing. As the amount of
traffic increases, the CPU load increases as well, and when the
throughput is around 1.2Mbit at about 2000 packet/s, the CPU is
running so high
Hi
We have a few cisco 7600 with dual sup-720s. I would like to get
notified somehow when a supervisor failover occurs.
Is there a snmp trap for this type of behavior or should I watch the syslog?
Regards
//MKS
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Extreme running EW 7.6 on the older hardware i think resolved some of the
issues that existed when running protocols over a multivendor environment.
The X250, X450 devices running XOS dont seem to have any issues yet. Cisco
and extreme in L2/L3 redundancy runs well when you consider the strengths
If you use HSRP v2 (which uses 224.0.0.102), will the appliances still have a
problem?
PS: You need 12.2(46)SE for this.
Leif Sawyer wrote on 14/11/2008 00:57:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou writes:
What about the following?
mac address-table static 0100.5e00.0002 vlan X int A B ...
Just don't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sridhar Ayengar
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:27 PM
To: Martin Moens
Cc: Cisco NSPs
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE
Martin Moens wrote:
Tried Ebay?
Yup. Very expensive.
On Friday 14 November 2008 17:14:00 Magnus Eriksson wrote:
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today
only seems to be used for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that
is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving ahead? I don't
wanna be stuck with a dead OS.
AFAIK, IOS XE was based on the
Authen 0/s 0/s
AAA Author 0/s 0/s
AAA Account 0/s 0/s
TCP Intercept0/s 0/s
Thanks,
Christophe
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3613 (20081114) __
The message
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Eric Van Tol wrote:
I'd have to agree that ebay prices for 7500 gear are absolutely insane.
I recently sold a couple of 7507s (one w/ a GEIP) and looked on ebay for
market prices. One person wanted $35K for their 7507 chassis with no
cards?! I put them both up for $5 -
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Garry wrote:
The 3825 can take 1GB? The Cisco ISR link doesn't show that.
Just checked again - I thought I had put 1GB in our FW-Router, but it's
only 768 at the moment (added a 512 to the stock 256) ... Anyway,
A sho proc cpu sorted would display which process(es) is actually eating
your resources.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gideon le Grange
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 11:20 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 2610 High
You'll need the ESP either the 5/10G too. *thinks*
IOS consistency it's something which most of us are keeping our
fingers crossed even though there're consistent releases for the SR,
XE and XR codes. :)
I believe there're lots of folks wanting to knock ITD's door down and
the various BUs.
10:50am Brett Looney said:
Has anyone ever gotten trunking working between a
3560 and Dell 6248 or similar? The Dell seems only
to support GVRP in comparison to Cisco's VTP.
Since the 3560 doesn't support GVRP I think I'm out
of luck, but I'm hoping someone here has figured out
a kludge to get
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:23 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE
You sold a GEIP (with PA-GE) for $125? I'd say street value of
Although i haven't tested them, you can try these two:
snmp-server enable traps chassis
snmp-server enable traps module
Keep in mind that you can use snmp-server enable traps syslog to get ALL
syslog messages as snmp traps.
--
Tassos
MKS wrote on 14/11/2008 12:13:
Hi
We have a few cisco
Magnus Eriksson wrote:
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today only seems to be used
for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving
ahead? I don't wanna be stuck with a dead OS.
Clarification: from what I can see, IOS XE is only used on the ASR 1000
On 14 Nov 2008, at 3:07 PM, Varaillon Jean Christophe wrote:
A sho proc cpu sorted would display which process(es) is actually
eating
your resources.
I know, but it doesn't show anything useful. Nothing seems to be
taking a noticeable amount of CPU.
G
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 07:17:14PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2008 17:14:00 Magnus Eriksson wrote:
Also, I'm a bit hesitant regarding IOS XE, which today
only seems to be used for ASRs. Is IOS XE something that
is gonna be built upon by Cisco moving ahead? I don't
It's interrupt probably due to the packet switching.
The numbers referenced are almost always FE2FE no features for
raw NDR (no drop rate) test.
For serial it's going to be less. Add features and it's less also.
Rodney
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:19:38AM +0200, Gideon le Grange wrote:
Good day
://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3614 (20081114) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Julio Arruda wrote:
Kevin Graham wrote:
Runs IOS XR, while the recent ASR 1000 series runs IOS XE?
Consistency
would be nice.
...or atleast call this a CRS-2 or something. I'm still crossing my
fingers
that there's a master plan for consistency (or alternatively, clear
Hi all,
We have a few large (6 member) cat3750 stacks in our environment,
most in L2 edge/access roles, and most providing PoE to cisco IP
phones.
Does anyone have any tips as to how to make large stacks more
reliable? We're seeing really high CPU and have found you need to be
really careful
Hi,
While trying to load-share between routes with same
administrative distance from distinct routing protocols,
I found this:
What if I configure the administrative distance to be
the same for two routing protocols? Will the router
install routes from each routing protocol and allow
me
When did a gig of RAM be the new requirement for a full table, with a
couple views only? It seems 512 on an ISR will still have 150MB free
with a full table. Our 2821 with 12.4(21) with 768MB has 400MB free
almost all the time.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi friends, I Have a Catalyst 6509 with a SUP720-3B running Cisco IOS.
I have not enough space on my flash card. Is it possible to boot other IOS
using TFTP? What could be the correct commands?
I tried the command: boot system tftp FILE IP
And tried to boot from ROMMON but I don't have the
Yeah..
Replace them. With Chassis(es).
Stacks are just a bad idea.
Failure of one part of the stack is a failure of the stack.
A 65xx serves just as well, better even; cheaper, more reliably, and with
less BS..
I'm in the middle of tossing (however many letters are, inclusive,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 04:02:40PM -0200, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
Two routing protocols, Same administrative distance?
http://www.internetworkexpert.org/2007/12/31/two-routing-protocols-same-administrative-distance/
I am wondering: any hint on how to work-around such
a behavior (if
Hello,
I am getting this type of errors when I restart the GSR, while loading the
IOS the alarm on GSR is not shown, once the whole GSR is loaded then I am
seeing this error. The led on clock shedular module showing major alarm.
Please help me with this errors why i am getting major alarm on
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 10:19 -0800, Dale Shaw wrote:
We have a few large (6 member) cat3750 stacks in our environment,
most in L2 edge/access roles, and most providing PoE to cisco IP
phones.
Does anyone have any tips as to how to make large stacks more
reliable?
The largest we've used was
split the stacks into smaller groups
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dale Shaw [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 1:19 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Catalyst 3750 stacks with many members
Hi all,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2008/11/13 Brandon Price
:
The tunnel option could work the problem is the SOURCE is behind a
Juniper netscreen and I don't think they support gre tunnel
termination..
Also I don't want this active all the time, I want it to switch
dynamically.
Hello!
I've got a Cisco ME3400 running 12.2(44)SE. Couple of /30s to it,
running hsrp and BGP, works good, except I cant access it telnet. And
rebooting it is not on the list.
When I try to telnet to the switch I get telnet: Unable to connect to
remote host: Connection refused.
I've
And once your back in, don't forget to enable service tcp-keepalives-in/out,
so it doesn't happen again.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Pinsky
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:27 PM
Hello everybody,
First of all, I'll introduce myself. I'm Patrick, responsible for a small
French hosting network. It was formely Foundry-based and now it has been
upgraded to Cisco 6500 / SUP720-3BXL routers.
I had been using sflow up to now. It's very simplistic - and worked well for
me with
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
And to repeat - to the best of my knowledge the 3825 can't take 1GB of
RAM and therefore is not an optimal solution for small multihoming. -Hank
Yes it can, table 2 here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5855/product_data_sheet0900aecd8016a8e8.html
Guys
I am trying to design a failsafe solution for a large amount of customers. The
solution is plain ethernet and i was plannning to use 3750-12s switches as a
router. However I read the Data Sheet from cisco and found out that it only
support 32 HSRP links. I have tried to get the same
Hello Matthew:
On 11/14/08 5:35 PM, Mathew Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guys
I am trying to design a failsafe solution for a large amount of customers. The
solution is plain ethernet and i was plannning to use 3750-12s switches as a
router. However I read the Data Sheet from cisco
You can use sampled netflow to accomplish the same thing as sflow. Netflow v9
is based on the ipix std so it will offer many of its features
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:00 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
I've got an EoMPLS VC between two devices. Device A is a Cisco 3750 Metro,
Device B is a ME6524. There are some intermediary devices in between.
The VC is up on the 3750M. The VC is down on the ME6524. There is a targeted
LDP session configured on both sides, both are up.
Both hosts are
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
And to repeat - to the best of my knowledge the 3825 can't
take 1GB of
RAM and therefore is not an optimal solution for small
multihoming.
-Hank
In Cisco's Dynamic configurator, you can upgrade from 256M to 1024M.
To get to the point - ASR1002 would be
On Saturday 15 November 2008 13:09:06 Ray Burkholder wrote:
Sometimes Juniper's supposedly unified feature set across
all devices seems like it might have benefits for easing
product selection in terms of hardware rather than
fighting for software / hardware combinations. Or is
that
45 matches
Mail list logo
