Re: [c-nsp] Load-sharing between two routing protocols with same administrative distance?

Hi, --On Friday, 14. November 2008 11:57 -0800 bill fumerola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: redistribute routes from one protocol into another and use route-maps to change the metrics and route 'type' (protocol dependent) such that the protocol considers them equal cost. the usual warnings about

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Christoph Loibl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Saturday, November 15, 2008 10:24: Hi, On Nov 15, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: you've configured vlan-based EoMPLS (i.e. xconnect on the SVI). In order for this to work on Cat65xx/Sup720, you need OSM/SIP as

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Hi, On Nov 15, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: you've configured vlan-based EoMPLS (i.e. xconnect on the SVI). In order for this to work on Cat65xx/Sup720, you need OSM/SIP as core-facing linecard, something which isn't possible on the fixed-configuration ME6524.. So you

[c-nsp] tftp

Hi How to copy the falsh to tftp? Can you help? thank you - Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] log failure logon

Thank you But I can't find this command ! I am using IOS (tm) 3700 Software (C3725-I-M), Version 12.3(6e), router#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. router(config)#line vty 0 4 router(config-line)#login ? local Local password checking

Re: [c-nsp] Recommended Cisco boxes for a smallmultihoming solution?

Ray Burkholder wrote: To get to the point - ASR1002 would be the box. Are ASR1002's actually worth 3x the price of something like a 7206VXR/NPE-G2? When you add appropriate licensing costs, pricing can become 5x to 10x the price. Does it push that many extra packets that much faster?

Re: [c-nsp] sampled netflow on 6500

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Mike Louis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can use sampled netflow to accomplish the same thing as sflow. Netflow v9 is based on the ipix std so it will offer many of its features Hi ; are you sure about this ? From what I've read it's the opposite : IPFIX has

Re: [c-nsp] sampled netflow on 6500

Sounds like I got that backwards. Here is a link to configuring netflow sampling. I don't see a lot of options in the SXH configuration guide at the moment. I will keep looking. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/configuration/guide/nde.html#wp1143262 From:

Re: [c-nsp] Maximum amount of HSRP sessions - NPE-G1

Hi Mathew, 2008/11/14 Mathew Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Does anyone know what the maximum amount of HSRP links are on the G1? I think 32 might be a little too restrictive. It depends on HSRP version. Version 1 uses 8 bits to address group numbers (0 to 255) and version 2 extends it to 12

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Thanks Stoffi, Oli.. The VLAN was SVI-based on the ME6524. I've switched to VLAN-based, attached to the outgoing interface.. The VC is not coming up, so I've included a snippet below, in case I've missed anything. Also, there is a name Cisco refers to adding a sub-interface for xconnect

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Hi Stephen What IOS version do you run on your 6524? Muxed UNI is supported from 12.2SR on 7600. You have to check the availability on the 6524ME Plattform... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SR/configuration/gu ide/pfc3mpls.html#wp1406020 cheers, michel -Original

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2008/11/15 Stephen Fulton : Thanks Stoffi, Oli.. The VLAN was SVI-based on the ME6524. I've switched to VLAN-based, attached to the outgoing interface.. The VC is not coming up, so I've included a snippet below, in case I've missed anything.

Re: [c-nsp] Recommended Cisco boxes for a smallmultihoming solution?

Łukasz, I'm not trying to argue that the ASR is not the better box in the Edge Router category, but I just want to remind everyone that Magnus originally was looking for: smallest recommeded[sic] Cisco boxes to use for a small multihoming solution With the requirements of: - 2 full BGP views

Re: [c-nsp] tftp

yes. it works how can I verify the flash? Thank you Mark Tinka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 19:57:18 chloe K wrote: Hi How to copy the falsh to tftp? #copy flash: tftp: Cheers, Mark. - Be smarter than spam.

Re: [c-nsp] tftp

You have to install TFTP server on your PC (solarwinds or any other ) and issue the command copy flash: tftp: u have to issue the command dir or show version to take the IOS image u want to copy and make sure of the connectivity between ur pc and the router (disable windows firewall and if u

Re: [c-nsp] tftp

Thank you but I can verify the flash is good thank you Mohammad Khalil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .hmmessage P { margin:0px; padding:0px } body.hmmessage { font-size: 10pt; font-family:Verdana }You have to install TFTP server on your PC (solarwinds or any other )

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 10.200.1.8:0 up MPLS VC labels: local 330, remote 69 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 MTU: local 9000, remote 1500 Try matching the MTU of both ends. Be aware that 3750 has both global and local MTU, and global MTU change on the 3750 require reload. Rubens

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Thanks Rubens, I totally missed that when I reconfigured for mux uni. The VC is now up, and I can pass traffic each way. Thanks :) -- Stephen Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote: Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 10.200.1.8:0 up MPLS VC labels: local 330, remote 69 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 MTU:

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Hi, On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:58:07AM -0500, Stephen Fulton wrote: MTU: local 9000, remote 1500 Welcome to EoMPLS hell. If MTUs do not match, the VC won't come up. And you can't change the raw MTU on a dot1q subinterface. I seem to remember that there is a knob in recent SR* IOS trains

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

Gert, When I decided to get into the networking field, I knew that MTU was the bane of the industry, I just did not realize I'd still be dealing with it years later :) EoMPLS hell, indeed. If Ytti's reading, I'd like to know what those details are too. Right now I have 7600/RSP720's in

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 2008/11/15 Rubens Kuhl Jr. : Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 10.200.1.8:0 up MPLS VC labels: local 330, remote 69 Group ID: local 0, remote 0 MTU: local 9000, remote 1500 Try matching the MTU of both ends. Be aware that 3750 has both

Re: [c-nsp] tftp

On Saturday 15 November 2008 19:57:18 chloe K wrote: Hi How to copy the falsh to tftp? #copy flash:filename tftp: Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS VC up on one side, not on the other.

On Sunday 16 November 2008 06:09:12 Gert Doering wrote: I seem to remember that there is a knob in recent SR* IOS trains that permits you to ignore MTU mismatches, but I have forgot the details - Ytti will know all the details (how to configure it plus availability). You might want to check

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU on 3750G-24-TS

We did this on a Cisco 7206VXR running 12.2(26) to regain several percentage points of CPUdefinitely worth it. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marian Durkovic Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:20 AM To: William Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 3560 to Dell 6248 Trunking?

Do you want to do trunking or manage vlans automatically over a trunk? Dot1Q should take care of the trunk part. I could have sworn Ive used GVRP on a 3560 before but I am not sure , it could have been a 3570 or something. Regards, Mario. ___ cisco-nsp