[c-nsp] 1700 Series WIC Modules

Hey guys, Is there any easy way to work out which IOS is required for the different WIC's available?? I have a 1751 series router that I am trying to get a 4 port FXS card working with and I would like to know what IOS will support it as it is currently not detected. Cheers, Aaron. L

Re: [c-nsp] URL redirection

Vikas, Google most likely uses some kind of IP geo-lookup, and they use your source IP to decide to which page you would be redirected. If you want your users to appear in different countries they should be using the local internet gateway connections... This would be the easiest way. Arie

Re: [c-nsp] issu on ios-xr

Marlon Duksa <> wrote on Monday, December 08, 2008 23:17: > Hi - does IOS-XR supports STATEFUL switchover of control plane? There > is a bunch of reference to this (RSP SSO, NSF, NSR, Gracefull > Restart) but it is not clear to me simply whether are protocol states > replicated to the standby RSP?

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow for 6500?

My understanding is that netflow export has been available since Sup1 PFC1. However, if you are coming from a "router" platform you are in for a few surprises. If you want to do per-interface netflow (i.e. specify the L3 interfaces you want to get data for) then you need to be running

[c-nsp] URL redirection

Hi, Need advice on URL redirection. The issue is one of our customer accessing Internet from different locations in Europe but his Internet access point (gateway) is in UK only. Now if he tries to access google.com and gets page google.co.uk from all locations. Now the requirement is if customer i

Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 15:28 -0500, Jeff Cartier wrote: > I've been recently asked by a co-worked for a solution to a scenario > where they are receiving multiple vlans from an ISP via an NNI and the > requirement is to bridge/combine them into a single vlan. > > Any thoughts or comments? Make sur

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 04:47:26PM -0500, David Coulson wrote: > I always hate this sort of configuration... > > Why not just assign Gi1/2 a secondary address from your 192.168 subnet > and make life simple? :) In an ideal world, I agree. But suppose you can't because a legacy architechture tha

[c-nsp] option 82

Hi list I'm trying to find information about how cisco formats the option 82 field in DHCP So far I got this http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/31sga/configuration/guide/unnumber.html#wp1073190 "TypeFormat type. The value 2 specifies the form

Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] lsp ping between JNPR and Cisco

When we replaced Csco with JNPR box as transit LSR, the PING worked. With or without 127.0.0.1. Obviously there is an interop issue between Csco and JNPR, namely Cisco is decrementing IP TTL as penultimate hop. And we don't know how to disable this... Thanks, Marlon On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 12:20 P

[c-nsp] issu on ios-xr

Hi - does IOS-XR supports STATEFUL switchover of control plane? There is a bunch of reference to this (RSP SSO, NSF, NSR, Gracefull Restart) but it is not clear to me simply whether are protocol states replicated to the standby RSP? I'm not looking for GR protocol extensions in conjunction with NS

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

I always hate this sort of configuration... Why not just assign Gi1/2 a secondary address from your 192.168 subnet and make life simple? :) Ross Vandegrift wrote: ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet1/1 ip route vrf foobar 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 GigabitEthernet1/2 __

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:50:05PM -0600, Nick Griffin wrote: > You have to manually add host routes as the next hop since you can't add the > router itself, another solution I found that work was this: > > "BGP Support for ipv4 Prefix Import". This for me worked well, you just need > to make sure

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

Hi, On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:24:54PM +0100, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > P.S: I guess we would also require this for global if we implemented > this today.. Don't :-) - there is useful usage cases for it. No pretty ones, admitted, but sometimes you can't be too selective... gert -- USE

[c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

I've been recently asked by a co-worked for a solution to a scenario where they are receiving multiple vlans from an ISP via an NNI and the requirement is to bridge/combine them into a single vlan. Any thoughts or comments? Thanks! ___ cis

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

You have to manually add host routes as the next hop since you can't add the router itself, another solution I found that work was this: "BGP Support for ipv4 Prefix Import". This for me worked well, you just need to make sure that the prefixes you wish bring in from the Global Table exist in the

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

I would hope so. :) -- Regards, Jason Plank CCIE #16560 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Original message -- From: "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ross Vandegrift <> wrote on Monday, December 08, 2008 20:31: > > > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan123

[c-nsp] 3550 12.2.25SEB4 ->12.2.44SE breaks OSPF?

NSP'ers, We recently did a maintenance to upgrade some of our aging 3550s to newer code. After the IOS upgrade, the switch came back online and formed OSPF adjacencies & exchanged traffic with all of our other switches, but could not maintain one with any of our routers. For example, the upgraded

Re: [c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

Ross Vandegrift <> wrote on Monday, December 08, 2008 20:31: > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan1234 > > However, there's a syntax ambiguity when you place this in a VRF, > since this is how you leak traffic out of a VRF: > > ip route vrf foobar 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan1234 > % For VPN rou

[c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

Hi everyone, In the global table, you can tell IOS to create a connected route by statically routing a prefix out an interface. This causes the box to ARP for next-hops out that interface without having an address assigned in the prefix: ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan1234 However, there's

[c-nsp] Cisco 1841 Maximum IPSEC Tunnels

Hi Guys, Does anyone have any real-world figures for the maximum number of IPSEC tunnels it is possible to run concurrently on an 1841 without the additional VPN/SSL AIM? The following doc indicates 800 with the AIM: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5853/data_sheet_vpn_aim

Re: [c-nsp] SXI out

Gert, et al: No issues here, non-modular, semi-production ME6524. IPv4, SNMP, BGP (full table filtered by RIR allocation), MPLS. IPv6 soon. SCP works. So far, so good. -- S. Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:47:32AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: I suspect SXI is hi