[c-nsp] 2851 and nat

2009-01-02 Thread Roy
I have a 2851 that I am trying to configure for incoming nat (from Internet to the inside). I copied the configs from another router (not 2851) that is working fine. The only difference is that the inside interface is now on a VLAN. An extract of the config is below: Any ideas welcome --

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Garry
Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: > Hello All: > > Is there an easy way to determine the model of an SFP installed on a 3560 > through the CLI? > > Ideally I want to match what I have installed in another 3560 that's in > production. I want to add a gigabit Ethernet (copper) trunk port to another > 3560

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Jeff Wojciechowski
Perfectthanks everyone. -Jeff From: Sidney Boumendil [mailto:sidney.boumen...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 12:22 PM To: Jeff Wojciechowski Cc: Marko Milivojevic; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI No difference. = means spare parts. Si

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Marko Milivojevic
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 18:20, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: > Sort of... > > NAME: "GigabitEthernet2/0/3", DESCR: "10/100/1000BaseTX SFP" > PID: , VID: , SN: xx > > Doesn't show the exact model number (GLC-T, GLC-T=, etc) Is there a > difference between the 2? Not

[c-nsp] IPv6 HSRP Support in 12.0S?

2009-01-02 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello: Does anyone know if IPv6 HSRP support will ever be written into the 12.0S code, specifically for GSR's? Regards, Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Sidney Boumendil
No difference. = means spare parts. Sidney On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jeff Wojciechowski < jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com> wrote: > Sort of... > > NAME: "GigabitEthernet2/0/3", DESCR: "10/100/1000BaseTX SFP" > PID: , VID: , SN: xx > > Doesn't show the

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Jeff Wojciechowski
Sort of... NAME: "GigabitEthernet2/0/3", DESCR: "10/100/1000BaseTX SFP" PID: , VID: , SN: xx Doesn’t show the exact model number (GLC-T, GLC-T=, etc) Is there a difference between the 2? Thanks, -Jeff -Original Message- From: mar...@gmail.com [mailt

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Matlock, Kenneth L
2 Ways I see to get it on the 3560 I have here (12.2(37)SE1 code) "show int transceiver properties" or "show int status" Either one gives me the SPF type I have in there. Ken From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Jeff Wojciechowski Sent: Fri 1

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Marko Milivojevic
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 17:36, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote: > Is there an easy way to determine the model of an SFP installed on a 3560 > through the CLI? > > Ideally I want to match what I have installed in another 3560 that's in > production. > I want to add a gigabit Ethernet (copper) trunk port

[c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

2009-01-02 Thread Jeff Wojciechowski
Hello All: Is there an easy way to determine the model of an SFP installed on a 3560 through the CLI? Ideally I want to match what I have installed in another 3560 that's in production. I want to add a gigabit Ethernet (copper) trunk port to another 3560 so should I be using the GLC-T, GLC-T=

Re: [c-nsp] Etherchannel port across SUP and line card

2009-01-02 Thread Pete Templin
Chintan Shah wrote: Jan 2 11:35:30.087 UTC: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi7/3 is not compatible with Gi5/1 and will be suspended (qos-card types of Gi7/3 do not match Gi5/1)… I dont have Qos configured on either Gi5/1 or Gi7/3 however I have globally mls qos enabled and uplink port of line card o

Re: [c-nsp] Etherchannel port across SUP and line card

2009-01-02 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, ou are trying to run an etherchannel across 2 different cards - they have different capabilities - the etherchannel needs to be constructed using similar interfaces - which you've now done by turning the QoS stuff off. using the same blade would 'fix' things (but remove resiliency) buying a ca

[c-nsp] Etherchannel port across SUP and line card

2009-01-02 Thread Chintan Shah
Hello guys, I had intially Gi5/1 ( SUP720 1Gig port) part of etherchannel between 6500. Later I added Gi7/3 ( 6724 line card) to etherchannel but Gi7/3 is not taking part in to etherchannel and givign belwo error in shwo log : Jan 2 11:35:30.087 UTC: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi7/3 is not compati