Aaron wrote:
In trying to do some IP policy routing on a 3750, I ran into some odd
behavior. I'd appreciate any pointers/help to get this working.
First of all, the 3750's does most things in hardware, and this is as a rule
not counted anywhere. You'll only see hits and counters moved when the
Can you send show sdm prefer . You would probably need routing-pbr or
route SDM template on your 3750 in order to support PBR.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note091
86a00801e7bb9.shtml
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi,
I'm in the middle of preparing a patch for SNMP::Info to detect the
operating systems and versions running on a wider range of Cisco equipment.
It's left me somewhat stumped what to write in the os field for most
of the devices below. IOS has a name, CatOS has a name, but what on
earth
If you ftp to (ftp.cisco.com), you can download all Cisco's MIB data
over anonymous ftp. They would be contained in those files.
Alternately, you could try using the search function on Cisco's web site.--
-
Brian Raaen
Network Engineer
email: /bra...@zcorum.com/
I have three chassis with the same SUP and IOS revisions. 1 chassis seems to
fail the cards, the other 2 seem to have no problems with them.
I will reboot the problematic 6500 during a maintenance window.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Bob Snyder rsny...@toontown.erial.nj.uswrote:
On Wed,
Jerimiah Cole wrote:
Pete Templin wrote:
...
I'm now leaning towards 'reachable-via any' on
all Internet customer ports, with per-port (per-customer) ACLs to
prevent spoofing.
Aside from having to maintain those per-port/per-customer ACLs and a
risk to multi-homed customers if
This question is in regards to QoS on a 3750...
If I'm trying to establish the PQ for Vlan2...and I have interfaces that
aren't in vlan 2, lets say they are an access-port in vlan 11...would
this interface configuration be correct or incorrect?
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
description
SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Cisco Firewall Services Module Version
3.2(10)
I can't get SNMP to work on a IDSM2 or I'd send you that output too.
Justin
Sam Stickland wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the middle of preparing a patch for SNMP::Info to detect the
operating systems and versions running
All,
I should clarify. I have access to all these types of devices, that's
why I'm adding the support to SNMP:Info in the first place :)
Cisco Firewall Services Module Version 3.2(10) strikes me as just a
description of the device, rather than containing an operating system name.
A
Ah, I'm with you now. I'll stop messing with these damn IDSM2s then. :-)
I don't know what their internal dev name would be but then again I
seriously doubt if many other people using SNMP::Info would either.
Were it me I think I'd name it something like this:
FWSM 3.2(10)
IDSM2 6.0(1)E1
Pete Templin wrote:
...
I'm now leaning towards 'reachable-via any' on
all Internet customer ports, with per-port (per-customer) ACLs to
prevent spoofing.
Aside from having to maintain those per-port/per-customer ACLs and a
risk to multi-homed customers if 'reachable-via rx' gets triggered
How much cpu load does enabling ip route-cache flow on an interface put on
a router?
Have a 7206vxr with 256M of ram. Runs BGP, but we only take a default
route from that particular upstream, not full or partial tables.
Router peaks out about 300Meg of traffic total in/out with the cpu topping
Keith wrote:
How much cpu load does enabling ip route-cache flow on an interface put on
a router?
Have a 7206vxr with 256M of ram. Runs BGP, but we only take a default
route from that particular upstream, not full or partial tables.
Router peaks out about 300Meg of traffic total in/out with
13 matches
Mail list logo
