Re: [c-nsp] Odd multicast behavior from an ME3400

I think you are missing a couple of steps. Packet count and capture. The multicast streams are UDP, are they? If so then: 1/ count packets sent on source and and packets received on independent receiver (not on switch) 2/ capture stream and verify UDP checksum (udp.checksum_bad == 1 in

[c-nsp] Service Deployment

Hi, I'm looking for GUI tool that can be used to easily deploy the following services on a large scale, over Cisco hardware: - Layer 3 MPLS VPNs - Layer 2 MPLS VPNs - Any Transport over MPLS - VPLS One option I had come across was Cisco's IP Solutions Centre. Has anyone had any experience using

Re: [c-nsp] carrier router models comparison

What's the difference between 40g/slot and 100g/slot ready ? Is it like vista ready? I would assume (wrongly?) that this is a hw limit? Best Regards, -mat -- pgp-key 0x1C655CAB ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Hi I would like to cap a physical GE interface to 100mbps whist running vlans through it on a GSR i.e. interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6  no ip address  no ip directed-broadcast  rate-limit input 100032000 12504000 12504000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop  rate-limit output 100032000

[c-nsp] etherchannel load-balancing on 4 Port ISE Gigabit Ethernet?

Hi, does anybody know how load-balancing in an etherchannel works on a 4 Port ISE Gigabit Ethernet for Cisco 12000 in detail? I have the following problem: I configured an etherchannel consisting of two GigabitEthernet ports on the same linecard. Only one port is utilized (see show command

Re: [c-nsp] Supervisor Failover - Speed question

Yes, failover shouldn't take 2-3 minutes. I've personally observed it as less than one second in several test environments. But I imagine it's highly dependent on the details. What it your criteria for measuring it as done? Are you pinging from a host on one port of the chassis to another?

[c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

Hi there, I am trying to come up with the best way to network servers that have out-of-band management such as the baseboard management controllers in many enterprise servers. Ideally, I would like to be able to assign the management device a RFC 1918 IP, have the actual server be on a

[c-nsp] No route drops packets : 117964064

Hi, I can see many drops bcos of no route availableit looks strange as this is mpls vpn network (knows abt loopback) and yes Internet routing table is available here. But if some issue on Internet drop should be on peering router... is it a sec. hack efforts!!! RP/0/RP0/CPU0:crs1#sh cef

Re: [c-nsp] NAT on ASR1000

We're also evaluating the ASR platform and besides 4 new bugs and 3 not supported features we have found, performance-wise ASR seems like a little monster. RLS5 or RLS6 will probably be our first production release. On the other hand, online documentation is missing a lot of stuff :( While

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Drew Weaver wrote: Ideally, I would like to be able to assign the management device a RFC 1918 IP, have the actual server be on a different subnet altogether but use a shared port. This isn't a good idea because of fate-sharing - you want your OOB management

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Mark Tech wrote on Thursday, April 09, 2009 13:15: Hi I would like to cap a physical GE interface to 100mbps whist running vlans through it on a GSR i.e. [...] However when I apply  the rate-limit command on GE0/0/6, I don't see any drop in traffic. Actually I have set up a throughput

Re: [c-nsp] etherchannel load-balancing on 4 Port ISE GigabitEthernet?

Jan Sandmaier wrote on Thursday, April 09, 2009 13:32: Hi, does anybody know how load-balancing in an etherchannel works on a 4 Port ISE Gigabit Ethernet for Cisco 12000 in detail? I have the following problem: I configured an etherchannel consisting of two GigabitEthernet ports on the

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

I second that approach. We use it for our builds whenever possible. You really do want your oob mgmt solution to be as isolated as possible from failures on the production side of things. We usually build a mgmt silo to accommodate out of band connectivity; with one or more fixed-configuration

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Hi Oli Thanks for that. I have tried that however I still see the interface as unaffected interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6  no ip address  no ip directed-broadcast  no negotiation auto  service-policy input gig-in  service-policy output gig-out policy-map gig-out   class class-default    police

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Hmm, can you replace the class-default with something like class-map all-vlans match vlan x y z ... where x y z match your vlan IDs, and see if this changes things? What does show policy-map int gig0/0/6 say? What type of linecard engine is this? E5/SIP? vrf shouldn't make a difference..

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

I agree. We completely isolate the ILO onto it's own discrete network. We supply Cisco 2950/2960's at the top of each rack, and it's on it's own RFC1918 IP block. Each ILO gets it's own /27, not related at all to the IP blocks the main servers use. The 2950/2960's then plug into a distribution

Re: [c-nsp] Rate limit Physical interface GSR

Hi tried the vlan policy map with standard and hierarchical but get the same issue when applying to an interface policy-map gig-out   class all-vlans    police 64000 4470 4470 policy-map parent-gig-out   class class-default    service-policy gig-out class-map match-all all-vlans   match vlan 

Re: [c-nsp] video,voip and internet over DSL (converged)

The hardest part to IPTV is not the technical aspect, but establishing contracts with the content providers, and additionally, encryption. If you can address those issues (first), then the next steps will be clear. There's a lot of middleware vendors out there, but I'm not sure any of them are

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

Roland Dobbins wrote: On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Drew Weaver wrote: Ideally, I would like to be able to assign the management device a RFC 1918 IP, have the actual server be on a different subnet altogether but use a shared port. This isn't a good idea because of fate-sharing - you

Re: [c-nsp] DNS Tool

Without having a more detailed explanation of what browsing problems your having, it's difficult to give any more specific advice, but here goes: 1) browsers cache DNS lookups, so if your having repetitive lookups fail off the same browser session, it's not actually a DNS problem even though it

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:20 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: I have two older Dell servers that only give you the option of a shared ethernet port for their onboard IPMI, take it or leave it. So, you can use the built-in port for that, and insert another NIC for use on the production side, yes?

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

Roland Dobbins wrote: On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:20 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: I have two older Dell servers that only give you the option of a shared ethernet port for their onboard IPMI, take it or leave it. So, you can use the built-in port for that, and insert another NIC for use on the

Re: [c-nsp] best way to network servers with management (iLO/IPMI)

On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Drew Weaver wrote: Ideally, I would like to be able to assign the management device a RFC 1918 IP, have the actual server be on a different subnet altogether but use a shared port. I know that BMCs generally can use VLAN tagging, but I'm really not sure how I can do all of

[c-nsp] Sonet hard patterns for testing

I just got bit by a problem with scrambling not being on on a POS OC3 with a upstream provider... (Long story - provisioning person at provider had no clue... insisted that it wasn't needed). Symptom of course was certain files just not being able to be transfered past a certain point -

Re: [c-nsp] Sonet hard patterns for testing

The problem data strings are usually either strings that match control codes or long sequences of either all ones or all zeroes. If too many bits go by without any transitions it is possible for the receiver to loose sync with the network. You might want to just try a packet of all zeroes or ones