Hi Marlon
Yes, Cisco has an appliance for RCC, which is based on a technology called VQE
(Visual Quality of Experience). The VQE consist of a server and a client, which
is installed at the enduser equipment (e.g. STB or PC). The client is free and
has been implemented on several STB from other
Hi - does anyone know of a Cisco product that does a server function for
Rapid Chanel Change and Retransmission. Is it a stand alone appliance or is
it a service module in a 7600?Thanks,
Marlon
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https:/
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 16:02 -0600, Clinton Work wrote:
> All the fields are there, I was asking about the column headers.
>
> 3750# show mls qos int f1/0/15 stat
> FastEthernet1/0/15
>
> cos: outgoing
> ---
> incomingno_changeclassified
All the fields are there, I was asking about the column headers.
3750# show mls qos int f1/0/15 stat
FastEthernet1/0/15
cos: outgoing
---
incomingno_changeclassified policed
dropped
0 - 4 :96372939 4929270
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 13:28 -0600, Clinton Work wrote:
> Anybody have a more detailed description of the field headers for the
> "show mls qos interface stat" output on a 3750? Table 2-30
> describes 6 field headers, but the command output only has 5 fields of
> output. Are they the same as
Hi,
(I'm copying my reply back to the mailing list, as other readers will
find the answers in the archives)
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:10:46PM -0400, Seth Fiermonti wrote:
> If it is so common, please answer.
We have this specific line of questions about once per months. It's
really not so h
Hello,
I recently configured a Cisco 3825 router with the IOS firewall, running
Zone-based Policy Firewall feature.
I'm experiencing the following issue:
ICMP unreachable packets, with code 4 (Fragmentation required, and DF flag
set), passing through the fw-router are properly processed at th
The policer stats (Inprofile and OutofProfile) are right next to each
other, instead of on top of each other, so there are indeed 6 fields in
the command output as well. In addition, you get enqueued and drop
statistics for each queue and threshold. You used to only get that from
the "show pl
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:49:29PM -0400, Seth Fiermonti wrote:
> I am new to this and got very confused looking at cisco.com. Can I do
> MPLS and large route tables with 67xx line cards in the 7600? I have
> DFCs in all cards. What are my limitations? Do I need ES/ES+ modules
> inst
Enhanced chassis (6500-E), DFC cards and SXI should do around 500ms.
Cisco has said in later versions it will move down to 50ms.
On my own L2 tests, the above setup did < 1s, regardless of which card was used for
passing traffic.
--
Tassos
Church, Charles wrote on 28/04/2009 22:13:
Unless th
Hello,
I am new to this and got very confused looking at cisco.com. Can I do
MPLS and large route tables with 67xx line cards in the 7600? I have
DFCs in all cards. What are my limitations? Do I need ES/ES+ modules
instead?
Any help is appreciated!
Anybody have a more detailed description of the field headers for the
"show mls qos interface stat" output on a 3750? Table 2-30
describes 6 field headers, but the command output only has 5 fields of
output. Are they the same as the 3550: incoming, no_change,
classified, policed, and dro
Unless there are DFCs involved, I would expect a tiny delay when the
linecards switch over to the other PFC. I thought Cisco promised
failover times or a second or two with SSO on a 6500. I think you're
seeing what you should.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nethe
Hi everyone,
I have a 7609s with 2 sup720, working in sso mode, now when the sup
switchover, according to cisco documentation, layer 2 traffic shouldnt be
interupted, but I noticed there's a rougly 0.6s gap in packet loss. (
traffic is in/out the same router, no other router involved). Is this
nor
> AFAIK there are some issues when using the the RSP720-10G in redundant
> configurations. Thats the statement we know, why the RSP is not yet
> general orderable.
Do you have any details on the types of issues?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@p
Hi Pshem,
Thanks for you reply.
It seems that our radius and vpdn-group configurations were correct but
we were missing the 'vpdn authen-before-forward' command on the middle
LNS which was causing the problem.
Thanks again for your input.
Regards
Steven
Steven McCrory
Senior Network Engine
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:36 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> SXI will accept and nvgen the following config:
>
> router bgp 64580
> bgp listen range 192.168.1.0/24 peer-group foo
> neighbor foo peer-group
> neighbor foo remote-as 64580
> !
> address-family ipv4
>neighbor foo activate
>
That's good news. That's what we heard as well. Since we are doing
box-to-box redudancy (eigrp load balancing) and not using SSO, RPR/RPR+ then
there shouldn't be an issue.
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4
AFAIK there are some issues when using the the RSP720-10G in redundant
configurations. Thats the statement we know, why the RSP is not yet
general orderable.
cheers,
michel
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Our cisco rep and var are pushing back on our plans to upgrade our 7600 from
sup32 to the RSP 720 with 10GE saying they are in limited production. Of
course, they are pushing us toward the ASR product line. Anyone know of any
issues with the RSP 720 w 10GE interfaces?
Matthew Huff | On
Just to confirm, from what I understand, IOS on the 12K only allows you
to configure GRE if you have a TSC (tunnel server card).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/gre.html
But, still not clear to me:
0- This still the case ? (I would assume so)..
1- Can we use newer gen c
21 matches
Mail list logo