[c-nsp] Defining new radius attribute on a Cisco NAS

2009-04-29 Thread Tojo RAONISOA
Hello, I would like to ask you how to define a new radius attribute on a Cisco NAS (Cisco 3825). We have already define the attribute on our AAA server, but we don't know how to configure the Cisco NAS for this new attribute. Please could you help us to solve this ? Thanks. Best regards Tj

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco MPLS interoperability with Mikrotik (or Linux) MPLS

2009-04-29 Thread Charles Wyble
Last time I looked into this (mid last year) the Linux bits weren't very mature. Not sure how Mikrotik or Vyatta have changed it. Hopefully they have made things better. Rubens Kuhl wrote: Have anynone done any testing interoperating Cisco MPLS (Cat 6k or 7600 families) with Mikrotik (which

[c-nsp] Cisco MPLS interoperability with Mikrotik (or Linux) MPLS

2009-04-29 Thread Rubens Kuhl
Have anynone done any testing interoperating Cisco MPLS (Cat 6k or 7600 families) with Mikrotik (which is just packaging of MPLS Linux) ? I'm specially curious about EoMPLS and H-VPLS interoperating, but basic LDP/RSVP/MPLS-TE/MPLS-FRR also needs to be addressed, of course. Rubens ___

Re: [c-nsp] Loose uRPF behaving like strict mode on 7600

2009-04-29 Thread Jon Lewis
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jose wrote: I was wondering if someone might have an explanation as to why we encountered an issue with uRPF (loose mode) when we tried enabling it on our upstream facing links. We have 2 x 7603s w/ SUP32 acting as our Gwy routers and our transit providers connect into th

Re: [c-nsp] 2975 stack... interoperability?

2009-04-29 Thread Brett Looney
> the new[ish] Catalyst 2975 switch looks like a 2960+stacking. > Do these things stack with 3750s / 3750Es ? They show > up as another "blade" on the stack? Word I have is that they do not stack. Haven't physically plugged one in to see what happens, however. B. __

[c-nsp] Loose uRPF behaving like strict mode on 7600

2009-04-29 Thread Jose
I was wondering if someone might have an explanation as to why we encountered an issue with uRPF (loose mode) when we tried enabling it on our upstream facing links. We have 2 x 7603s w/ SUP32 acting as our Gwy routers and our transit providers connect into them (one on each gwy + private peer

[c-nsp] Pix 515 to 837 DSL IPsec Tunnel

2009-04-29 Thread Clue Store
Hi All, This seems like a simple solution, but I cannot seem to get this working. What I have is a the following setup... 837---[Internet]Pix5157200--[T1]Customer 2691 I have a lan to lan tunnel going from the 837 to the pix. The 7200 behind the pix is addressed with

Re: [c-nsp] rate limit per user traffic with WLC and billing system

2009-04-29 Thread a. rahman isnaini r.sutan
ormation from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4043 (20090429) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mail

Re: [c-nsp] rate limit per user traffic with WLC and billing system

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Granados
her.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4043 (20090429) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _

Re: [c-nsp] ASA / EIGRP / Redundant Interfaces

2009-04-29 Thread Tony Varriale
It's really hard to say without knowing some details about your network but if you want 1 path active at once you can always use the max-paths command set to 1. tv - Original Message - From: "Jason Link" To: "Cisco-nsp" Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:57 PM Subject: [c-nsp] ASA /

[c-nsp] rate limit per user traffic with WLC and billing system

2009-04-29 Thread Burak Dikici
Hello , We want to rent the internet access service to the houses which are provided to employees. That's why we need bandwidth limit per user and billing system solution. There will be also a guest users in the network. Could you give me an idea , is it possible to do that with Cisco wireless

[c-nsp] 2975 stack... interoperability?

2009-04-29 Thread Jeff Kell
Quick question... the new[ish] Catalyst 2975 switch looks like a 2960+stacking. Do these things stack with 3750s / 3750Es ? They show up as another "blade" on the stack? Jeff ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] ASA / EIGRP / Redundant Interfaces

2009-04-29 Thread Jason Link
Hello all, With an ASA running a redundant physical interface pair for the Inside interface, each link connected to a separate switch which is connected to a separate router, and everything running EIGRP, I get multiple routes (2) to the same destination subnet, one for each of the connected ro

Re: [c-nsp] ICMP unreachable packets handling on IOS firewall (Zone-based not CBAC)

2009-04-29 Thread Anthony GUENEAU
Hello, Forget about it. I solved the issue by clamping the TCP MSS (maximum segment size) to 1200 bytes on packets flowing through the corresponding router interfaces. I used the following command in config-int: ip tcp adjust-mss 1200. This trick prevent IP fragmentation along the path by forcing

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Jay Nakamura
Thanks Steve, after seeing your example, I found this http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080114326.shtml Would it work on inbound traffic? On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Steve McCrory wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > Here's an example of a nested policy th

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients

2009-04-29 Thread Justin Shore
Jason, Michael, and Luan, Thanks for the replies. That's exactly what I was looking for. I never looked for a sub-option under the split-tunnel config. I figured there was an alternate command to the split-tunnel command that I just couldn't find. Thanks again Justin Jason Link wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients

2009-04-29 Thread Ryan Hughes
Not really - simply don't specify a split tunnel policy under the group-policy for the Remote Access group on the ASA. group-policy RAS attributes dns-server value X.X.X.X vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec split-tunnel-policy excludespecified ! don't need split-tunnel-network-list va

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients

2009-04-29 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hi Justin: -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:30 AM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients I've got what's probably a simple question t

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients

2009-04-29 Thread Jason Link
In the group policy for the specific VPN instance, use "split-tunnel-policy tunnelall" -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin Shore Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:30 PM To: 'Cisco-nsp' Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] video processing modules

2009-04-29 Thread Lars Lystrup Christensen
Hi Marlon Unfortunately I'm not that familiar with all the IPTV equipment. I just saw a few slides about the system last week at a local Cisco conference. I suggest you contact your local Cisco contact for further details. __ Med venlig hilsen / Kind r

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Justin Shore
Leif Sawyer wrote: The bad: There is no cisco firewall archetecture that allows mixed-mode IPv4 and IPv6. Oh, they -claim- that it works, but it is so full of caveats and bugs that it is effectively broken. Does this include the FWSMs or just the ASAs and PIXs? 2) if you ment

[c-nsp] PIX/ASA full tunnel for clients

2009-04-29 Thread Justin Shore
I've got what's probably a simple question that I just can't figure out. Is there a trick for setting up a "full" tunnel client VPN profiles (ie, no split tunneling?) on a PIX or ASA running v7 or better? I used to do this on VPN 3000 Concentrators with ease but my searches on "cisco ASA ipse

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Seth Mattinen
Renelson Panosky wrote: > Hello fellow Engineers > > We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you are running > IPv6 right now please let me how is it working fo you? I would like to know > the good, the bad and the ugly > I'm not an ISP but I have deployed IPv6. I currently onl

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread TJ
While this is a great conversation, and I hope people continue to jump in, I have something to say in response to the following excerpt: ... and The Ugly: 1) there are no Cisco training classes for IPv6-based services. Oh, sure, there's an -intro- to IPv6. But nothing in t

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Renelson Panosky
Thank you all for the responses on IPv6 i've learned a lot from you guys and i feel a lot more comfortable Renelson On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Renelson Panosky wrote: > Hello fellow Engineers > > We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you are running > IPv6 right now ple

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Steve McCrory
Hi Chuck, Here's an example of a nested policy that we have deployed on 7206VXR (NPE400): policy-map cust_4Mbvoip_parent class class-default shape average 400 service-policy cust-4Mvoip-out ! policy-map cust-4Mvoip-out class cust-rtp priority percent 28 class cust-skinny

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Thomas Braun
Hi, you should try Class Based Weighted Fair Queuing (CBWFQ), This ist what you are looking for. Regards thomas We have several customers coming in on Ethernet. They are connected to L2 switch and trunked into a 7500 router via VLAN. This has worked fine so far with the use of rate-limit

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread David Prall
Probably better to stumble over to the ipv6-...@lists.cluenet.de archives http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky

Re: [c-nsp] CSS 11501 Question

2009-04-29 Thread Don Nightingale
"clear running-config" Kelsay, Mark wrote: I need to erase an old config and tried the erase config command but it did not work. Any idea what the command is? I am consoled into the console port. TIA, Mark ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited **

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Church, Charles
Steve, You have an example of this? I've found on the platforms I work on most that you can't use any LLQ (priority keyword) on a subint. So I've put a policy handling the priority stuff on the main int, and then the other shaping/policing stuff on the subint, but have always questioned

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread David Freedman
No IPv6 uRPF in hardware on 6500/7600 No IPv6 uRPF at all in many other cisco platforms. Dave. Renelson Panosky wrote: > Hello fellow Engineers > > We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you are running > IPv6 right now please let me how is it working fo you? I would like to k

Re: [c-nsp] video processing modules

2009-04-29 Thread Marlon Duksa
Thanks Lars. Do you know by any chance what is this appliance called? Probably the video module on ASR9K will have it as well. Thanks, Marlon On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Lars Lystrup Christensen < l...@dansketelecom.com> wrote: > Hi Marlon > > Yes, Cisco has an appliance for RCC, which is

Re: [c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Steve McCrory
Have you tried implementing Modular QoS CLI (MQC) using service policies? I haven't worked on the 7500 platform but we have successfully applied QoS for VoIP on subinterfaces on the 7200 series routers. It should be noted that on sub-interfaces, you need a parent service policy to shape traffic t

[c-nsp] RES: CSS 11501 Question

2009-04-29 Thread Leonardo Gama Souza
Are you in debug mode? if not, execute: #llama -Mensagem original- De: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] Em nome de Kelsay, Mark Enviada em: quarta-feira, 29 de abril de 2009 12:43 Para: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Assunto: [c-nsp] CSS 11501 Ques

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Leif Sawyer
> Renelson Panosky writes: > We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you > are running IPv6 right now please let me how is it working fo you? > I would like to know the good, the bad and the ugly. The good: I have a heirarchical addressing model that puts all of my loop

Re: [c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Steve Bertrand
Renelson Panosky wrote: > Hello fellow Engineers > > We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you are running > IPv6 right now please let me how is it working fo you? It works just as well as IPv4 does :) > I would like to know > the good, - it's just emerging so learning/imp

[c-nsp] CSS 11501 Question

2009-04-29 Thread Kelsay, Mark
I need to erase an old config and tried the erase config command but it did not work. Any idea what the command is? I am consoled into the console port. TIA, Mark ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** Authorised and regulated by the Financial Servi

[c-nsp] QoS and VLAN

2009-04-29 Thread Jay Nakamura
We have several customers coming in on Ethernet. They are connected to L2 switch and trunked into a 7500 router via VLAN. This has worked fine so far with the use of rate-limit on the sub-interface. Most customers have 5~10mbps. However, we are increasingly needing QoS so VoIP traffic does not

[c-nsp] Anybody here is running IPv6

2009-04-29 Thread Renelson Panosky
Hello fellow Engineers We are getting ready to start testing IPv6 at my job, if you are running IPv6 right now please let me how is it working fo you? I would like to know the good, the bad and the ugly Renelson ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@pu

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 with Sup720-3CXL and 6704/8 line cards

2009-04-29 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 22:24 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 04:10:46PM -0400, Seth Fiermonti wrote: > > If it is so common, please answer. Ehh... that seems like very questionable logic. To me this says: If the answer is so common that I'd have to be quite careful NOT to fin

Re: [c-nsp] 3750 and show mls qos interface stat output

2009-04-29 Thread Clinton Work
I added the column headers based upon what I thought they were. :-) What I missed is that they are simply the packet counters for each DScP or COS value. The 3550 was limited to reporting on 8 DSCP markings at a time and it didn't occur to me that the 3750 could report on all DSCP and COS v