You've got me totally wrong, I'm not bitter and I'm not moaning nor growning,
just telling what I think about it.
I disagree with the certification world wide business, is that being bitter? Is
that to moan?
If you think my opinion doesn't fit here then I'll refrain from doing it again.
If a mana
> we are now required to disable SSL 2.0 on all SSL proxies.
>
> Looking at the command reference there does not seem to be an option to do
> this.
It's a trick question; SSLv2 isn't supported (at most, you can configure a
destination to shunt v2 traffic to):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/i
If you're using the 7200's for L2TP DSL, then I don't think the 7600 can do LNS
role ?
Feature navigator shows that VPDN isn't supported on 7600 and our test 7600
doesn't even know about the "vpdn enable" command.
Am I missing something ?
regards,
Tony.
--- On Fri, 8/5/09, Stephen Kratzer
My reply looks to be about as long as your initial question!
Chris T wrote:
I'm stuck. I don't want to cheat. I also don't want to have to work three
or four times harder to achieve the same results as someone else. Moreover,
if even the moderator won't tell me what is fair and what is not, w
You also may want to configure 'carrier-delay msec 0' on the interface. But you
will need to configure dampening on it as well.
Tweaking 'timers pacing flood' under OSPF process is an option, but use it with
caution.
If you are using LDP, I would recommend using LDP-IGP synchronization.
Do not fo
8 bytes/4470 bytes (default mtu) = 0.18%
That's per packet assuming they are 4470. So, not enough to worry about it.
Aaron
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:55, wrote:
> > if i have POS interface (STM-1 link) and i enabled MPLS on it
> > how much header i will lose from the overall capacity (155.52 M)
Thats a different problem. APS wouldn't have anything to do with that.
Do you have other interfaces being monitored correctly at the same speed?
Aaron
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 13:11, Pete Templin wrote:
> Aaron wrote:
>
>> Just monitor both ports as normal. One for each. That's what we used to
>
Walter Keen wrote:
When redesigning an OSPF service provider network, (default values, with
many gig-e links). Aside from fixing link cost issues (100mbit is
treated the same as gig-e at the moment) should I look at sub-second
timers in OSPF 'ip ospf dead-timers minimal .' Or BFD. It looks
When redesigning an OSPF service provider network, (default values, with
many gig-e links). Aside from fixing link cost issues (100mbit is
treated the same as gig-e at the moment) should I look at sub-second
timers in OSPF 'ip ospf dead-timers minimal .' Or BFD. It looks
like either would req
Ziv Leyes wrote:
If we're talking about ethics then I think the whole certification thing is not
ethical and unfair,
Life isn't fair. :)
to classify a person asking 'em for a paper that costs a lot of money
to not just get but to "maintain" it's merely doing business on people's
back.
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:52 -0500, Derick Winkworth wrote:
...
So hearing you say that some CCIE, or multiple CCIEs, didn't remember
fact "x" and therefore you call into question the value of the CCIE as a
certification... I guess that demonstrates how badly you are missin
Hi,
We have an ASR (1004) in our network. I've noticed that traceroutes
that exit the L3VPN on the ASR don't have the ASR as an IP hop. I
understand what is causing it, but the 7301s don't seem to exhibit the
same behaviour. We would like to have this functionality mainly for
debugging and troubl
Hi,Can anyone point me to the documentation where it says that Cisco IOS-XR
on CRS-1 supports a true in-service-software-upgrades (ISSU)?
I've been looking on CCO but all they talk in IOS XR is ISSU where they
patch a code and things like that.
What I'm looking is to upgrade a CRS-1 to a new sof
Hi list
I have an old AS5300 that is out of support.
I'm looking for SW that is more recent than c5300-is-mz.121-17.bin but
still runs on 64ram and fits in 8 flash.
According to the sw feature navigator, there is c5300-is-mz.12.1-27b,
but it's no longer available from cisco
Is there someone out t
A big giant YMMV and "just my two cents", but here goes:
I agree with OP Chris that it still feels like cheating, but Steve
here definitely hits on a major point:
Even if you have the best of intentions and integrity, and have
studied the textbooks and courses as best you can, you will still run
i
Hi,
We have a number of CSMs with SSL model WS-X6066-SLB-S-K9 (IOS
12.2(18)SXE1 CSM 2.1(5)) and we are now required to disable SSL 2.0 on
all SSL proxies.
Looking at the command reference there does not seem to be an option to do this.
Does anyone know if this is possible?
Thanks
Andy
On Friday 08 May 2009 05:25:31 pm Pete Templin wrote:
> I'm in the process of bringing up my first SONET APS-protected
> (single-router APS) link, and it's been an adventure.
Is this a true 'single-router' APS setup, or is it a 'multirouter' APS setup
that just happens to be on a single router?
> if i have POS interface (STM-1 link) and i enabled MPLS on it
> how much header i will lose from the overall capacity (155.52 M)
> and how the interface type will affect on the size ?
MPLS labels are 4 bytes each. You typically need 2 labels, thus 8
bytes. There are situations where you might n
Hey all
if i have POS interface (STM-1 link) and i enabled MPLS on it
how much header i will lose from the overall capacity (155.52 M)
and how the interface type will affect on the size ?
Thanks
_
Show them the way! Add maps and d
You are using this port for UPLINK, and it could be a trunk port. I
strongly suggest you should not use portfast on this port. This way you
can avoid loops and 30 second wait will be worth it.
Regards,
Masood
Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/
> Hi,
>
> When I plug wire into c3750g port, it woul
That port is directly connect to a server.
so I choice type command "spanning portfast" on that interface and it
works well. :)
Thanks for all yours support !!~ :)
Regards,
pigsign
2009/5/12 :
> You are using this port for UPLINK, and it could be a trunk port. I
> strongly suggest you shoul
Hi,
I've had a look at some of the third party 1000baseLX SFPs which are
Cisco-coded so no "service unsupported-trans" was required. We used an
optical power meter and did notice that the transmit power was less than the
genuine Cisco transciever but still sufficient for specification. The
t
Darren Yang wrote:
When I plug wire into c3750g port, it would wait about "30sec" then
change to uplink status.
Are there any method can cut down uplink time?
"spanning-tree portfast" on the port, providing that the port connects
to a single end device that isn't bridging.
Peter
Darren Yang wrote:
Hi,
When I plug wire into c3750g port, it would wait about "30sec" then
change to uplink status.
Are there any method can cut down uplink time?
sounds like its going through STP
if its an edge port, configure it as such (portfast).
Hi,
If you're connecting a host then:
spanning-tree portfast
on the interface will cut this time down.
kind regards
Pshem
2009/5/12 Darren Yang :
> Hi,
>
> When I plug wire into c3750g port, it would wait about "30sec" then
> change to uplink status.
>
> Are there any method can cut down uplin
> I hope this has improved since I last looked at it.
In short...no.
When I was preparing for the MPLS exam I found a post in a certification
forum relating to a blatant mistake in one of the labs. I think it was
configuring EIGRP as the CE-PE routing protocol and the information in
the lab asks
Hi,
When I plug wire into c3750g port, it would wait about "30sec" then
change to uplink status.
Are there any method can cut down uplink time?
Regards,
Pigsign
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list
Hi,
> The web example question was "how many usable /26 do you have in a /24"
> and the answer was "2". Right. Like ANYONE has ever IN THE REAL WORLD
> used a Cisco router without "ip subnet-zero" and "ip classless" since
> 1995.
>
> I hope this has improved since I last looked at it.
not rea
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Steve McCrory wrote:
* People who don't use TestKeys or equivalents to study for an exam. I
would say that these people are in the minority and often require more
than 1 attempt to pass an exam because they are not prepared for
ambiguity of Cisco's questions
Last time I
>From my experience there are three groups of people when it comes to
passing Cisco Exams:
* People who only use TestKeys or equivalents (TestKing, Pass4Sure etc)
to study for the exams. These people may look good in terms of having a
wide range of qualifications but they are soon found out, often
30 matches
Mail list logo
