On 2009-06-20 23:44, MKS wrote:
What alternatives are out there for a similar amount of money?
For example ASR 1k with RP1 or RP2 end properly sized ESP. Look for the
cisco.com site for details.
--
Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski
If it's not okay,
On 2009-06-19 18:43, Phil Mayers wrote:
I see in your original post you mentioned netflow - you will probably
want to have a look through the archives for the (many, long) threads
where people document their problems with netflow on this platform.
Specifically, like the FIB, the DFCs have
I second that, besides, back then, there were not so many bugs as today, as
with every new feature and more complex technology comes also a lot of bugs.
When systems were simpler, there were less problems, how many times do you
remember having to hard reset your PC when using DOS 6.2 because it
Oops. Yes of course, thanks for that! The point about distributed netflow is a
good one - we'd certainly exceed the tcam limits without it
-original message-
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 vs RSP720 - Difference?
From: Łukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net
Date: 21/06/2009 07:58
On 2009-06-19
hey all
i have ring of 11 routers and i have access routers connected to these core
routers
if i have for example a device (name it x) connected directly to core 2 and the
access number 1 is connected directly to core 2
if the link is failed between the device x and core 2
how much time will
Thanks for the reply,
Still there must be a way to prioritize (or block) skype traffic. In my
scenario just because of the small uplink bandwidth I need to give it
priority.
I tried a packet capture on my pc and random ports were used.
But maybe I can give priority to traffic destined to Level
Hello.
i have ring of 11 routers and i have access routers connected to these core
routers
if i have for example a device (name it x) connected directly to core 2 and the access number 1 is connected directly to core 2
if the link is failed between the device x and core 2
how much time will
Those ETSI racks are about 20.5 inch width (From mounting hole to
mounting hole). So the 23 inch convertors won't fit.
Rinse
Jeremy Parr schreef:
You can purchase generic rack extenders for 23 racks at racksolutions.com
On 6/19/09, Rinse Kloek rinse.kl...@isp.solcon.nl wrote:
All,
I
Are you talking about OSPF reconverge time it the situation?
If you are,
the answer is 4 x OSPF hello timer configured on interfaces.( by
default: 40 secs for broadcast-multiaccess and
point-to-point and 120 secs for NBMA links).
Plus (worst case) the LSA origination timer (default: 5
Raymond Lucas wrote on Tuesday, June 02, 2009 08:10:
Hi,
I have been gradually rolling out OSPF across a network including the
following bit of config:
router ospf 172
ispf
timers throttle lsa all 10 100 5000
timers lsa arrival 80
Which was fine until I arrived at a couple of
Ziv Leyes wrote:
I second that, besides, back then, there were not so many bugs as today, as
with every new feature and more complex technology comes also a lot of bugs.
When systems were simpler, there were less problems, how many times do you remember having to hard reset your PC when using
I'm afraid you are out of look. In order to get skype 3.0 into IOS, Cisco had
to leave behind PDLM and hard code it. Even then it's pretty useless. Only
solution is to get to 12.4(22)T+
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577
http://www.ox.com
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:34 -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
Curious..I don't know that platform forwarding architecture.
But what does 'sh int stat' give you?
We've begun running some production traffic through the box now and it
doesn't seem to be overly loaded by more flows, but maybe it really
Do I need to buy the advanced ES line card licence to support a couple of
manually configured VRFs on 7600 using ES+ cards ?
The only info on CCO I can find to explain the Advanced Licence is below and
doesn't really make it clear is its exclusively for MPLS. (In my case the
ES+ cards are
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com wrote on 22/06/2009
01:47:27 a.m.:
RE: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA timers
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
to: Raymond Lucas, cisco-nsp
22/06/2009 01:47 a.m.
Raymond Lucas wrote on Tuesday, June 02, 2009 08:10:
Hi,
I have been gradually rolling out OSPF
G'day,
I'm trying to configure up bi-directional WCCPv2 on a Cisco 3750
with redirect lists to limit the traffic being redirected.
I'm trying it on 12.2(50)SE2 ipservicesk9.
If I add a redirect list to the wccpv2 service definitions the
traffic becomes CPU processed.
If I remove the redirect
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009, Adrian Chadd wrote:
G'day,
I'm trying to configure up bi-directional WCCPv2 on a Cisco 3750
with redirect lists to limit the traffic being redirected.
I'm trying it on 12.2(50)SE2 ipservicesk9.
If I add a redirect list to the wccpv2 service definitions the
traffic
Hello all,
I have Cisco router 3825, and I am thinking of to upgrade it with AIM-VPN/SSL-3
VPN module.
If anyone has worked on AIM-VPN/SSL-3 module, What is the prerequisite to
install this module on 3825.
Please advice me should I to upgrade the IOS. Now it is IP Base.
Thank you in advance
I was thinking to ask the following question to my provider, hoping to
get an answer
How robustly architected is the MP-BGP?
How fast is convergence?BGP times ? scan timeres in and out?
What IGP is the provider using in their core?
What bandwidth they gonna guaranteed ?
As you said the convergence
19 matches
Mail list logo
