On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:35:59 -0400
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
> >>> rtr4#show ip bgp ipv6 unicast 2001:1020:100::3/128
> >>> BGP routing table entry for 2001:1020:100::3/128, version 0
> >>> Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> >>> Not advertised to any peer
> >>> Local, (
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
>>> rtr4#show ip bgp ipv6 unicast 2001:1020:100::3/128
>>> BGP routing table entry for 2001:1020:100::3/128, version 0
>>> Paths: (1 available, no best path)
>>> Not advertised to any peer
>>> Local, (received & used)
>>> 2001:1020:100::3 (inaccessible) from 2001:1020
Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
> It seems it's a bug that appeared first in 12.2(50)SE and later releases.
> To be fixed in SE3, scheduled for release on 23th July.
Thanks for the info!
--
Tim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puc
> > rtr4#show ip bgp ipv6 unicast 2001:1020:100::3/128
> > BGP routing table entry for 2001:1020:100::3/128, version 0
> > Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> > Not advertised to any peer
> > Local, (received & used)
> > 2001:1020:100::3 (inaccessible) from 2001:1020:100::2 (10.10.1.14)
>
Here is what I am getting and I have a fix after piles of digging, but
that doesn't excuse the behavior from Xerox.
We use Cisco Network Registrar for DHCP and after chasing this issue we
have decided to turn off "allow-lease-time-override", which If
allow-lease-time-override is enabled for a
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Michael Balasko <
michael.bala...@cityofhenderson.com> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know of any RFC's that pertain to how a host device should
> behave regarding DHCP when the link come up? Newer windows machines and
> some flavors of *nix behave like I think they should
Aleksandr Gurbo wrote:
> How to setup reflected route in route table with correct next-hop?
>
> I have iBGP RR on IPv6 addresses with two rr-clients. All ibgp peers between
> routers from Loopbacks. For announce ipv6 Loopback addresses used OSPFv3.
> rtr4#show ip bgp ipv6 unicast 2001:1020:100::
Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> If there's a bunch of enterprise folks that can't figure out how to
> download images, they should hire some contractor to stage images for
> them instead of impairing the rest of the networking world.
>
Remember some of the absolutely brain dead questions that used to come
One clue is in RFC2131 [1]
[...]
A client SHOULD use DHCP to reacquire or verify its IP address and
network parameters whenever the local network parameters may have
changed; e.g., at system boot time or after a disconnection from the
local network
[...]
Still it says SHOULD, not MUS
Does anyone know of any RFC's that pertain to how a host device should
behave regarding DHCP when the link come up? Newer windows machines and
some flavors of *nix behave like I think they should and that is they
will attempt to renew a DHCP lease on a link up. What we are finding is
that all our
I normally manage to find the release notes fairly simply, Support->IOS-> Pick
a version -> Release notes are then under General Information.
That's not to say I don't agree with the rest of your comments though :-)
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cis
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:40:39PM -0700, Lasher, Donn wrote:
> LAN on a switch, multiple PC's. .Single router with 1+ Ethernet ports.
> What's the currently recommended method of handing off redundant LAN
> connections on the same physical router? (I looked at but not into GLBP,
> maybe that?
How to setup reflected route in route table with correct next-hop?
I have iBGP RR on IPv6 addresses with two rr-clients. All ibgp peers between
routers from Loopbacks. For announce ipv6 Loopback addresses used OSPFv3.
My test scheme:
IPv6net1--rtr3---rtr2_RR---rtr4--IPv6net2
rtr2_RR reflect IP
> There's no way I'm downloading 250MB+ images just to re-upload them over
> whatever slow internet access I happen to have at my desktop/laptop to our
> staging system.
Also a critical habit for archiving. Finding an interim build that you got 6
months ago and now have to re-use is only su
On Thu Jul 09, 2009 at 11:41:16AM +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> Has anyone seen the new download "experience"?
>
> http://www.cisco.com/web/tsweb/flash/swc/cisco_support_swc.html
>
> Multiple downloads
> Download cart added
> Cisco's downloader is (must be?) used
I had it foisted on me
If their downloader must be used, I will be unable to download their
software for our network anymore.
There's no way I'm downloading 250MB+ images just to re-upload them
over whatever slow internet access I happen to have at my desktop/
laptop to our staging system. The cookie system has w
sh inv raw
sh diag
--
Tassos
Vincent Dong wrote on 09/07/2009 11:04:
How to get the SN of ESR-HH-1GE&ESR-4OC3ATM-SM card in ESR 10008 by CLI?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/c
Has anyone seen the new download "experience"?
http://www.cisco.com/web/tsweb/flash/swc/cisco_support_swc.html
Multiple downloads
Download cart added
Cisco's downloader is (must be?) used
--
Tassos
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.ne
How to get the SN of ESR-HH-1GE&ESR-4OC3ATM-SM card in ESR 10008 by CLI?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
19 matches
Mail list logo
