Just note that it's not a requirement but you may need to...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/release/notes/asarn82.html
tv
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan West"
To: "Tillinger, Steve" ; "Justin M.
Streiner" ;
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [c-
Also note that the SSL VPN is not exactly friendly with some screen reading
software and other adaptive tools.
If this poses a problem which it can in some instances it's something you
want to consider.
- Original Message -
From: "Justin M. Streiner"
To: "Tillinger, Steve"
Cc:
S
We've used this free IPSec 64-bit Windows client for the Cisco VPN:
http://www.shrew.net/
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services
Eric Girard wrote:
Something relatively recent that makes the lack o
We got minor packet loss and noticeably slower speeds off the bat with 'mls
qos' enabled with all defaults, even with only 40-50% interface utilization.
In fact it took a while to figure it out. Be very careful when you enable it
if even minor packet loss will be an issue.
--
Randy
www.FastServ.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Mills wrote:
> Anyone currently (successfully) using the SSL VPN on an ASA box (5520 or
> above)?
>
> I'm in uncharted territory with this feature and not sure if it is
> worth going down this route.
>
I am using it quite extensively in a c
One thing to note before upgrading to 8.2+ is the increased memory
requirements. If you're using a 5510, you'll want to upgrade to a 512MB stick.
-ryan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tillinger, Steve
Se
Something relatively recent that makes the lack of 64-bit support much more
palatable is the new Essentials license. It needs 8.2 code, but for short
money it gives you AnyConnect client only SSL VPN support for the max number of
tunnels supported by the box. It restores the cost/benefit of th
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Tillinger, Steve wrote:
If you upgrade to ASA 8.2, there's a AnyConnect Essentials license which
allows you use the SSL client for the number of IPsec connections your
ASA is licensed for. This license is only around ~$100.
So if you have a 5520 with 750 IPsec licenses, wh
If you upgrade to ASA 8.2, there's a AnyConnect Essentials license which
allows you use the SSL client for the number of IPsec connections your
ASA is licensed for. This license is only around ~$100.
So if you have a 5520 with 750 IPsec licenses, when you add the
AnyConnect Essentials license, yo
If you upgrade to ASA 8.2, there's a AnyConnect Essentials license which
allows you
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Justin M.
Streiner
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:22 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sub
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Charles Mills wrote:
Anyone currently (successfully) using the SSL VPN on an ASA box (5520 or above)?
I'm in uncharted territory with this feature and not sure if it is
worth going down this route.
I've deployed it for a client and it seems to work pretty well, though as
Anyone currently (successfully) using the SSL VPN on an ASA box (5520 or above)?
I'm in uncharted territory with this feature and not sure if it is
worth going down this route.
Chuck
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.net
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 02:59:08PM -0400, Atif Sid wrote:
> I tried using prioerity queue for Realtime traffic on RSp 702 it is not
> supported. how can we prioritze realtime traffic is the core facing link is
> on RSP-720.
Have a look at this doc.
Configuring PFC QoS
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/d
Just an FYI - this is a document that explains overall functionality of BFD
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk365/tk480/technologies_white_paper0900aecd80244005.html
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Justin Shore wrote:
> MKS wrote:
>>
>> Can you share your experience with BFD o
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
Has anyone met such an issue?
Whenever i use more than 2 files in the boot sequence, i get the SP BOOT
variable desynchronized (RP BOOT is fine).
I have seen it in SXH3a, SXI1, SRD2a. Is there a lower limit on the number of
chars in SP BOO
MKS wrote:
Can you share your experience with BFD on the 7600 platform and sw release?
I use it and like it. However beginning with SRB2 Cisco removed support
for running BFD on SVIs. To date there is no workaround and the feature
hasn't been added back to SR. Otherwise it works fine in my
Found the problem with the print sever to actually be a broadcast NTP packet
sent from the print server which in turn made the machines on the subnet do an
arp request which in turn made the print server send arp responses. The arp
responses were the reason the port would exceeded the threshold
Hi list
According to this document, BFD runs on 7600 on the hardware below
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk365/tk381/technologies_white_paper0900aecd80243ff4_ps6599_Products_White_Paper.html
Can you share your experience with BFD on the 7600 platform and sw release?
The document
ML wrote:
I'm about to turn on "mls qos" for the first time on a 6509E.
I would like some background information from the QoS experts on this list.
Last time I turned on "mls qos" it was a 3560 which has certain
undesirable defaults when "mls qos" is turned on. I want avoid the same
result w
Jeff Bacon wrote:
How are the ports that are on the supervisor module hooked into the
fabric/PFC? Are they at any significant advantage or disadvantage
compared to ports on linecards?
IIRC they're bus-attached ports on the plain sup720. I think they're
fabric-attached on the sup720-10g.
The
Running the "telnet" command does not work too well (although it might work
a bit better from Tcl EEM policy than from tclsh).
http://blog.ioshints.info/2007/10/you-cannot-start-telnet-session-from.html
However, you can open a TCP socket (to telnet port) from Tcl and issue the
commands. You could
21 matches
Mail list logo
