Hi all,
Does anyone know whether there is any notable performance difference
with WCCPv2 using L2 redirect vs GRE as a packet forwarding method on
7200s? (NPE-400, NPE-G1,
NPE-G2)?
WCCPv2 is a heavy user of processor cycles on our 7200s so I'm looking
at ways to reduce the impact without
Hi Mihai,
Check out CSCsz68307 - this occurs when someone attempts to configure an
invalid IP address as a BGP peer - after that you are unable to create any
additional peers as you get the error message *% Create the peer-group first.
To resolve the problem you either need to reload the box
Hi Chris,
I reloaded the box this morning, but I'll configure the command in order
to prevent further issues :)
Thanks:)
Chris Mason (chrimaso) wrote:
Hi Mihai,
Check out CSCsz68307 - this occurs when someone attempts to configure an invalid IP
address as a BGP peer - after that you are
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 05:53:07 am Alan Buxey wrote:
and hope you dont hit another bug. waiting with intense
interest for SXI3 which should stop the instant crash
when using ISIS with IPv6 :-(
Are you seeing this in SXI2?
We are planning to move to SXI2a at the end of October.
We are
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 04:39:53 am Richard A
Steenbergen wrote:
Personally my recommendation for going forward is SRC
(SRC4 is pretty stable, all things considered).
Would also recommend SRC; we have it largely deployed on a
number of 7200's.
SRC4 is stable, but a few issues, that
the culprit was CSCsy58115
what a relief
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Ved Labs vedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ben for the directions .
I enabled the bgp dampening for VPNv4 address-family .
It helped to some extent to see the flapped statistics from the CE .
I blocked one of
How do i *debug bgp updates within VRF*
**
*Thanks,*
*Biddu.*
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hello group,
I'm troubleshooting a NAC issue. I see lot's of CLOSE_WAIT sessions on the CAS
and i need to find a way to restart the SSO service
(TCP:8910) without restarting the whole box. Disabling the option Enable
Agent-Based Windows Single Sign-On with Active Directory
(Kerberos) in the CAM
Upgraded to SRC4 last night and everything went pretty smoothly.
A couple things I'm wondering if anyone has seen with SRC4:
1- When SRC4 booted, we were a little paniced when we saw that a
bunch of our SFP ports were now dark. We resolved it by pulling the
fiber and the SFP and reseating
The real issue with NAT today is ALG processing and scale.
My motto is if you are not going to sign up for full support in hardware
on a box that can scale to 1+ Mpps don't bother half baking it.
I deal with a customer about once per week where they tried something
like this.
The ASR1k (no
I found a matching bug in the meanwhile but the workaround does not work:
+
CSCsk46672 Bug Details
CAS stops listening on 8910 after threads in CLOSE_WAIT state
Symptom:
Agent fails to perform ADSSO
Conditions:
CAS no longer listening to tcp port 8910
NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4426 (20090915) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4426 (20090915) __
The message was checked by ESET
ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4426 (20090915) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4426 (20090915) __
The message was checked
Donato Dunguihual Morales wrote:
Hi,
I need to graph via snmp and mrtg or rrdttool , ip traffic and
protocols for Cisco sce 2020 box.
I saw in the web , the utility rtmcmd.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6135/products_user_guide09186a00808165dd.html#o16507.
Iґm trying to
Does anyone have any suggestions for providing Ethernet links over
bonded T1s?
We originally looked at Overture. They claimed that their product used
standard MLPPP and interoped well with 7200s. They sent out a tech to
help configure it in a lab. As it turns out they also require the use
Has anyone gotten AnyConnect client to work with IOS router and Vista?
(With self signed cert?)
I got it to work with XP but not Vista. Can someone share their
config or some pointers?
With Vista, it gets to the cert warning part, then dies.
aaa authentication login ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1
On Sep 16, 2009, at 12:14 AM, Justin Shore wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions for providing Ethernet links over
bonded T1s?
Yes - don't do it, given that the basic premise of running layer-2
between sites is a Very Bad Idea, much less trying to do it over
bonded T1s, heh.
;
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought us
enhanced
Does anyone have any suggestions for providing Ethernet links over
bonded T1s?
Yes - don't do it, given that the basic premise of running layer-2
between sites is a Very Bad Idea, much less trying to do it over
bonded T1s, heh.
In general I would agree. However, there is quite a
It should work after you allow it.
Btw, it took me 1 hour to download an ASR1k IOS today with the new downloader!!!
And i couldn't find another way to download it.
--
Tassos
Jay Hennigan wrote on 15/09/2009 20:39:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could it
do something malicious? How do you know for sure?
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 -
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access your file
system, since it presents its own file manager looking thing so you can pick
where to save the files. No way to know for sure though.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could it
do something malicious? How do you know for sure?
I can't
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access
your file system, since it presents its own file manager looking
thing so you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for
sure though.
Another reason to use
Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access your file
system, since it presents its own file manager looking thing so you can pick
where to save the files. No way to know for sure though.
But every browser has a built-in download utility so this
Top posting since it's so brief.
http://www.radware.com - they have all different manner of conversion
technologies in their product set.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in
order
to download a file? What exactly is that Java applet doing? Could
it
do
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:25 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access
your file system, since it presents its own file manager looking
thing so you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for
sure though.
But
Please check the email thread a week or so back where I gave the direct
contacts for feedback.
They are open and want to hear helpful constructive feedback.
Rodney
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I
You probably need to enabled cookies.
--
Tassos
Seth Mattinen wrote on 15/09/2009 21:22:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
It should work after you allow it.
Why should I need to allow Unrestricted access to my computer in order
to download a file? What exactly is that
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Church, Charles wrote:
It looks like it needs unrestricted access so that it can access your
file system, since it presents its own file manager looking thing so
you can pick where to save the files. No way to know for sure though.
When you say backup path for patch-protection, are you talking about path
protection? I've never done path protection, but it is slightly slower than
FRR with link or node protection to converge, but from what I understand it is
alternative to FRR that does link and node and the path gets set
Having a wierd issue with LLDP between a 6500 and a 3750
There are two gig links which are in a port channel.
The 6500 (r2 below) sees a lldp neighbor on both ports but the 3750 only
shows the 6500 being a neighbor on the port which it has most recently
received an update. This is breaking some of
I agree 100% It makes no sense to force people to use proprietary download
managers, especially when they fund the bandwidth used to retrieve the
file. :thumbdown:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:19 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all, first time poster, please be gentle...
I have a client scenario that I can't work out in the lab for a few
days, hoping someone here might already know if it is possible or not.
I have a client with an ASA5505, base license, currently
Hello Dave:
snip
Hello all, first time poster, please be gentle...
I have a client scenario that I can't work out in the lab for a few
days, hoping someone here might already know if it is possible or not.
I have a client with an ASA5505, base license, currently utilizing the
restricted
While testing out Fast Reroute I notice that after a linkdown and successful
FRR switch onto bypass, the SUT does not switch back to the primary path
after link is restored and IGP reconverges. Is this expected behavior or am
I perhaps missing some important config statement? I am testing on
Hi Biddu,
If you wish to see route table updates, then you can use debug ip routing vrf
name. This will show you the updates as they are applied to the VRF routing
table.
If you wish to see what BGP specifically is doing then something like deb ip
bgp vpnv4 unicast updates should help you
While testing out Fast Reroute I notice that after a linkdown and successful
FRR switch onto bypass, the SUT does not switch back to the primary path
after link is restored and IGP reconverges. Is this expected behavior or am
I perhaps missing some important config statement? I am testing on
39 matches
Mail list logo
