Re: [c-nsp] Power Issue

2009-09-27 Thread Justin Shore
Mohammad Khalil wrote: We have Cisco device cisco ME-C6524GT-8S (R7000) processor (revision 1.3) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory. now the issue is that we have in each site a device like the mentioned and a WiMAX RAS , all is functoning on DC power now the issue is that we are experiencing

Re: [c-nsp] Another bughunt, this time VRF PBR

2009-09-27 Thread Justin Shore
David Freedman wrote: wonder if anybody has come across this before, in 12.4(15)T, configuring a virtual-access per-user such: I hate to suggest the obvious but since there are so many bugs in 12.4(15)T have you considered bumping that to the latest minor rev? I think they're up to T7 or T8

Re: [c-nsp] 6509-E with sup720

2009-09-27 Thread David Prall
Is it dumping to rommon. If so just boot : Most likely have a corrupt config register on the switch processor. Sh boot ! for the RP Remote command switch sh boot ! for the SP Conf t Config-register 0x2102 End Now confirm that they are correct on both the RP and SP. I think if you

Re: [c-nsp] 6509-E with sup720

2009-09-27 Thread Childs, Aaron
Try boot [device]:[image file name] --- Aaron Childs Assistant Director, Networking Westfield State College http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/ From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky [panoci

[c-nsp] 6509-E with sup720

2009-09-27 Thread Renelson Panosky
Everytime i power this switch i am getting this error Autoboot: failed, BOOT string is empty and i can't remember the code to bypass it can anybody help me with this? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/li

Re: [c-nsp] QOS mismatch for channel ports ??

2009-09-27 Thread Phil Mayers
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:41:01PM +0100, Jeff Fitzwater wrote: That command is not available on 12.2SXI but I see that I could just disable QOS per PORT. It's a per-interface command, not a global command, and it's definitely available under SXI because we're using it. i.e. int Po1 no ml

Re: [c-nsp] Which IP's belong to AS1234?

2009-09-27 Thread Ziv Leyes
I use CIDR Reports, great site with useful stuff http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS1234 Put whatever AS you want in the end of the link HTH Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex Howells

[c-nsp] Power Issue

2009-09-27 Thread Mohammad Khalil
We have Cisco device cisco ME-C6524GT-8S (R7000) processor (revision 1.3) with 458752K/65536K bytes of memory. Processor board ID CAT1209C0AV R7000 CPU at 300Mhz, Implementation 0x27, Rev 3.3, 256KB L2, 1024KB L3 Cache Last reset from power-on SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technol

[c-nsp] Another bughunt, this time VRF PBR

2009-09-27 Thread David Freedman
wonder if anybody has come across this before, in 12.4(15)T, configuring a virtual-access per-user such: Framed-IP-Address = 10.0.0.1, Cisco-AVPAIR += "lcp:interface-config=ip policy route-map TEST\nip vrf receive TEST\n", Cisco-AVPAIR += "ip:route=vrf TEST 192.168.100.0

Re: [c-nsp] Hacking

2009-09-27 Thread Jared Mauch
You can syslog these messages remotely as well. there are numerous ways to create a chain of events that will allow someone to hide their tracks, the best methods are to null route the ip of the tacacs, radius or logging server, clearing logs, etc. - Jared On Sep 27, 2009, at 8:30

Re: [c-nsp] Hacking

2009-09-27 Thread Graham Wooden
Well, if they didn't clear your logging buffer, you will see an entry like this in your log on the router if they went into config mode: Sep 23 12:25:00.603: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by log_in_username on vty0 (src IP addy) So, it will show you the username they logged in as a

Re: [c-nsp] Hacking

2009-09-27 Thread Alexander Clouter
Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > can i know from the log or using any other method if the router was hacked ?? > When RANCID collects (or fails to collect) the configuration file off your router every day (or hour), it will compare it to the previous run and

Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Preamble and FCS on EoMPLS

2009-09-27 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:50:23PM +0200, Reinhold Fischer wrote: > What would be the benefit of transporting the Ethernet preamble? Transparently transporting OAM done within the preamble? Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _

[c-nsp] Hacking

2009-09-27 Thread Mohammad Khalil
hey all can i know from the log or using any other method if the router was hacked ?? _ Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/wi