[c-nsp] jumbo frame over the VLAN

2009-10-28 Thread tseveendorj
Dear all, Is it possible connection between MD3000i SAN and ESXi 4.0 with jumbo frame over VLAN. Because I have only one Cisco 3560-E switch. Best regards, Tseveen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "multicore"?

2009-10-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009, David Hughes wrote: > >The smartest/sanest thing to do, IMHO, would be to work at migrating > >to NX-OS, feature-set by feature-set. It's by far the cleanest and > >best-designed OS platform Cisco have come out with to date. > > Couldn't agree more. NX-OS looks like a

Re: [c-nsp] Xconnect on Portchannel interface [EoMPLS]

2009-10-28 Thread David Hughes
On 20/10/2009, at 8:01 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: I had another thought after my original reply, but for some reason I didn't send you follow-up. Have you tried not enabling EC on Cisco doing xconnect (PE) at all and simply having it just on end-nodes: A===PE1---PE2===B This is the config

Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "multicore"?

2009-10-28 Thread David Hughes
On 28/10/2009, at 11:18 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote: The smartest/sanest thing to do, IMHO, would be to work at migrating to NX-OS, feature-set by feature-set. It's by far the cleanest and best-designed OS platform Cisco have come out with to date. Couldn't agree more. NX-OS looks like a gr

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS to IOS XR Conversion

2009-10-28 Thread Grzegorz Janoszka
Eduard Gheorghiu wrote: There is an automatic translator tool but only available internally to Cisco SE. It does a good job. We have been using this tool, but its output was not fully accepted by our CRS-1 routers. It was at the beginning of 2009 and it is possible they fixed it. -- Grzegor

Re: [c-nsp] Aftermarket/DIY mounts for Cisco ISR AIMs

2009-10-28 Thread Justin Shore
Dale Shaw wrote: Hi, Long story short: we've got a bunch of VPN AIMs but no mounts (stand-offs/spacers). It happened 'cause a colleague removed them for government security compliance reasons, but left the mounts behind (still attached to the system board). It's not feasible to recover the mount

Re: [c-nsp] show logging system ??

2009-10-28 Thread Justin Shore
Jeff Fitzwater wrote: We had a module fail on a 6500, which reseating it cured it for now. Looking at the System Logs using the "show logging system" I see the following messages at the time of the failure.I have not found the explanation anywhere on the CISCO site for the values in thes

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS to IOS XR Conversion

2009-10-28 Thread Eduard Gheorghiu
There is an automatic translator tool but only available internally to Cisco SE. It does a good job. Eduard On Oct 23, 2009 3:14 PM, "Mark Tinka" wrote: On Friday 23 October 2009 03:48:17 pm Jason Alex wrote: > Dear All, > Is there is any... Start here: http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/ios

Re: [c-nsp] SPA V1 vs V2

2009-10-28 Thread Benny Amorsen
Rob Shakir writes: > I can confirm that the v1 SPA does _NOT_ support QinQ termination - it > will let you configure it with 'encaps dot1q 400 second-dot1q 200', > but will just fail to do anything. I wish that Cisco would fix it so > that these cards that do not support a feature do not let you

Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "multicore"?

2009-10-28 Thread Roland Dobbins
On Oct 28, 2009, at 7:53 PM, James Weathersby (jweather) wrote: A lot of it has to do with the different roles the routers play. The smartest/sanest thing to do, IMHO, would be to work at migrating to NX-OS, feature-set by feature-set. It's by far the cleanest and best-designed OS platf

Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "multicore"?

2009-10-28 Thread James Weathersby (jweather)
Thanks, yeah we're talking with all of those guys. A lot of it has to do with the different roles the routers play. -Original Message- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:49 AM To: James Weathersby (jweather) Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "m

Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 "multicore"?

2009-10-28 Thread James Weathersby (jweather)
We're looking at a lot of options, but trying to avoid having to re-write the entire OS. At last count, T train IOS had over 4500 features, and I think we have customers using every one of them on an access router. We can't afford to eliminate any of them in a rewrite as some other platforms have

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM traffic distribution across internal etherchannel

2009-10-28 Thread NMaio
David, It appears that I might have misunderstood the original question since it was only pertaining to traffic from the FWSM. My apologies. Thanks, Nick From: David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) [mailto:dwhit...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:32 PM To: Nicholas Maio Cc: j4b...@gmail.com

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS x-connect to router itself

2009-10-28 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Probably not very relevant, but 7600/ES cards support local connect. -- Tassos Rubens Kuhl wrote on 27/10/2009 22:28: I was wondering if IOS MPLS routers (ME6500 PFC3C in my case) can establish an MPLS x-connect to itself, although it's not the IP address of router-id but another loopback addre

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS x-connect to router itself

2009-10-28 Thread Per Carlson
Hi. > I was wondering if IOS MPLS routers (ME6500 PFC3C in my case) can > establish an MPLS x-connect to itself, although it's not the IP > address of router-id but another loopback address added for this > purpose. In Cisco language, this is called "Local Switching" (see http://www.cisco.com/en/