It looks like you're right. This Trio chipset is a 30G chipset (full duplex)
and they have 4 of them per a 120G line card.
It makes sense, they have a 50G (full duplex) chipset on the T1600 core box
and then the 30G one for the MX. Of course they are totally different
chipsets, the former being no
On 2009-10-30 23:07, Gert Doering wrote:
I'm not sure if I find "have different labels" a compelling reason for
not being interchangeable (or having different PPS specs).
Boot helper is one of the most misunderstood parts of the 7200 series
anyway... (*and* it can be changed).
They can be cha
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:07 AM, Jason Alex wrote:
Does anyone knows how to block this kind of TCP SYN attack ?
You need to contract your peer(s)/upstream(s) and report the attack,
so your peer(s)/upstream(s) can mitigate on their side. You should
also replace the 7200 with a hardware-based
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:40:15PM -0500, Jaquish, Bret wrote:
> The NPE-G1 cards have a more detailed explanation:
>
> "The Cisco 7200 VXR routers and Cisco uBR7200 series routers use different
> models of the NPE-G1 processor. For the Cisco 7200 VXR routers , order the
> NPE-G1 or NPE-G1=
Dear All,
I have a TCP SYN attack on one of my routers (Cisco 7206), which
causes the traffic to increase 100 Mbps on the Uplink interface
This router is a PE router in a MPLS environment
when i configured access-list to block the attack source , this causes the
CPU utilization of the
christian koch wrote:
looks as if its working based on the activity in this thread...
Or not. The concept is to build suspense and get the
vict^H^H^H^Hreaders to think it's something cool.
If two weeks ahead of time the grassroots is revealed to be Astroturf
spun by a marketing outfit and
Richey wrote:
I've been asked if this will work. I would think that it would but I would
like a second opinion.
7206 VXR with an NPE-400, 512Mb ram, C7200 I/O 2FE/E card and two
PA-MC-T3s. The PA-MC-T3s are 90 Bandwidth points each and the I/O
controller counts as 400. There would be s
Sorry, yes. There is a jitter buffer however only configurable between
3 and 29 ms. When we tested it a 29ms, we noted a severe failure of all
modem and most fax calls through this box.
Phil Bedard wrote:
Is there a jitter buffer on the RAD boxes you can adjust? Generally
plain voice can de
Is there a jitter buffer on the RAD boxes you can adjust? Generally
plain voice can deal with a decent amount of latency. If you can do a
50ms or higher jitter buffer, FRR may allow you to not underrun.
Phil
On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Walter Keen wrote:
Sorry, our current situation is
looks as if its working based on the activity in this thread...
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
And I'd say it's working since it's being talked about pretty heavily.;)
- Original Message -
From: "Omachonu Ogali"
To: "Drew Weaver"
Cc: ; "Cisco NSP"
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???
It's a marketing campaign. A so-calle
I've been asked if this will work. I would think that it would but I would
like a second opinion.
7206 VXR with an NPE-400, 512Mb ram, C7200 I/O 2FE/E card and two
PA-MC-T3s. The PA-MC-T3s are 90 Bandwidth points each and the I/O
controller counts as 400. There would be some MLPPP Bundles
It's a marketing campaign. A so-called viral campaign (according to their
blog -- http://opinion.rapp.com/).
The IP is hosted by Rapp Collins Worldwide, who's a marketing firm. Don't
know the actual client is.
oo
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> On Halloween, no less.
>
>
> On Halloween, no less.
It's fifteen days, not hours.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
This may be out of your budget, but the Cisco WLCs + WCS do a great job of
this. WCS will identify rogue access points and also identify if the AP is
"on-net" or just rogue. It also has a containment feature that works very
effectively in quarantining APs and making them difficult / impossible to
Span your outbound traffic and look for IPs with a TTL that is off by one.
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of quinn snyder
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 12:37 PM
To: Marcelo Zilio
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.n
The guys at Cacti have a plugin called Mactrack that will do this as well. It
also has a MAC db download function that will do the lookup for you.
-ryan
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sen
inline
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:37 PM, quinn snyder wrote:
> inline comments
>
> On Friday, October 30, 2009, Marcelo Zilio wrote:
> >
> > A third option (if your switches support it) is enable port security and
> > maximum mac address numbers on each switchport.
> >
>
> depending on if the de
Possibly. Are there differences in the I/O ports on the UBR-NPE-G2 and the
"non-UBR" NPE-G2? I really haven't had any experience with the UBR models of
routers.
Bret
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pruett [mailto:j...@clean.q7.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:45 PM
To: Jaquish, Bre
"The Cisco 7200 VXR routers and Cisco uBR7200 series routers use
different models of the NPE-G1 processor. For the Cisco 7200 VXR routers
, order the NPE-G1 or NPE-G1= product. For the Cisco uBR7200 series
router, order the UBR7200-NPE-G1 or UBR7200-NPE-G1= product. The two
models of NPE-G1 hav
I think this will answer your question:
For NPE-G2:
"The Cisco 7200 VXR routers and Cisco uBR7200 series routers use different
models of the NPE-G1 and the NPE-G2 processors. For the Cisco 7200 VXR routers,
order the NPE-G1 or NPE-G1= product. For the Cisco uBR7200 series routers,
order the UB
inline comments
On Friday, October 30, 2009, Marcelo Zilio wrote:
>
> A third option (if your switches support it) is enable port security and
> maximum mac address numbers on each switchport.
>
depending on if the device is being used as layer3 and how his
topology is set up, a single mac addre
Have a look at switchmap: http://sourceforge.net/projects/switchmap/
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: 30 October 2009 18:09
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Good way of find
Hi Mike, these are great ideas. Unfortunately, my biggest problem is the
folks who had my job before me didn't believe in things like best practices
or researching something before they set it up so I am spending a good deal
of time trying to undo the work done before me. I plan on having our
On Halloween, no less.
My first thought was we're all going to be spammed by network resalers in the
next few days when I looked at that, but I then just thought wow this is
incomprehensible jibberish.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: Lynch, Tomas [mailto:tomas.ly...@globalcrossing.com]
Scott Granados wrote:
> Hi all
> I have a general question. I have a network consisting of about 20
> access switches and 2 core switches. We have 3 access points that we
> manage but think someone might have brought in a linksys or DLink
> consumer device and plugged in. (users, can't live with
First, I wanted to give thanks to David for helping me track down this issue
and for providing insight into the workings of the FWSM.
To recap the issue I was seeing the majority of outbound traffic from the
FWSM was exiting on the 3rd and 6th port of the ether-channel while the
inbound traffic to
Hi Scott,
I think Wireless LAN Controllers are the best tool to do that.
A cheaper option is use Netstumbler. I don't have it right now but as long I
recall it finds manufacturer ID.
A third option (if your switches support it) is enable port security and
maximum mac address numbers on each swit
Only an idiot will make an important announcement on a Saturday.
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matlock, Kenneth L
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 1:15 PM
> To: Drew Weaver; Derick Winkworth; Cisco
Try Netdisco.
http://netdisco.org/
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Granados
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 2:09 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Good way of finding unauthorized
Yeah the software forwarding idea just ends up crashing large boxes like the
7609. If you suddenly enable a feature that causes software forwarding or
you run out of TCAM and software starts to make up for that, say goodbye to
either performance or your SUP/RSP.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:45 AM,
Hi all
I have a general question. I have a network consisting of about 20 access
switches and 2 core switches. We have 3 access points that we manage but
think someone might have brought in a linksys or DLink consumer device and
plugged in. (users, can't live with em, can't shoot em)
Is ther
I've seen CPU spikes which have caused a switchover. These were caused by
software switching and spikes in traffic. Specifically it was a very large
number of MPLS tunnels in a lab configuration and we ran out of ACL_TCAM ...
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, samuel vuillaume wrote:
> Hi Guys,
Chris Wopat wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm trying to get a lab 7204VXR (NPE-400) up and running on SRC code, and am
>> having no luck.
>> I've loaded it up with 12.2(33)SRC4 ipbase, and 12.2(33)SRD3 ipbase, and the
>> router locks or crashes on boot each
>> time:
>>
>> Cisco IOS Software, 7200 So
Maybe some new kind of transport. Ether anyone?
--
Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: "Matlock, Kenneth L"
To: "Drew Weaver" , "Derick Winkworth"
, "Cisco NSP" ,
Sent: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:15:19 -0600
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???
> Gibberish, and market
Gibberish, and marketing speak.
My guess is a linux-based 'router' they're trying to sell to
unsuspecting mom-and-pop businesses.
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-n
> > Some might not see that as necessarily a bad thing, provided
> > the ASIC is robust enough to handle all of the user's
> > required features in the hardware path (being the only path)
> > :-).
>
> This is one of the things we like about vendor J - packets are either
> forwarded in software
Just looks like a bunch of gibberish to me.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Derick Winkworth
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:23 AM
To: Cisco NSP; juniper-...@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Netwo
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking one of the feature of BGP called - Add path that allows
> the advertisement of multiple paths for the same address prefix and was
> reading this RFC
>
> http://potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-00.txt.
>
> So if in service provider scneario where we u
http://networkliberationmovement.net/
15 hours some big announcement? Anyone know what this is?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-
I've used a npe-g2 card in a ubr before, but haven't tried the other way
around.
Joe Pruett wrote:
Cisco "UBR" routers are used as cable CMTS devices...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/cable/ps2217/index.html
i understand the difference between the ubr and the regular 7200
series. i'm
Sorry, our current situation is that during a spanning tree switchover,
it encounters a buffer underrun error on the RAD box, and we are looking
to see if perhaps a mpls TE tunnel with explicit paths (2 explicit paths
plus a dynamic path) would help matters any as opposed to just layer 2
vlans.
> > one of the luxuries we have with NX-OS is since we have
> > complete separation of control-plane and data-plane there
> > really isn't anything that drops you into software
> > forwarding.
> > that in itself is a major benefit - but it does come with
> > the cost that the platform is only capab
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to get a lab 7204VXR (NPE-400) up and running on SRC code, and am
> having no luck.
> I've loaded it up with 12.2(33)SRC4 ipbase, and 12.2(33)SRD3 ipbase, and the
> router locks or crashes on boot each
> time:
>
> Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-IPBASE-M), Ver
Cisco "UBR" routers are used as cable CMTS devices...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/cable/ps2217/index.html
i understand the difference between the ubr and the regular 7200 series.
i'm wondering about just the npe-g2 card. is there any difference between
the npe version for ubr and t
On Friday 30 October 2009 04:13:01 pm Lincoln Dale wrote:
> one of the luxuries we have with NX-OS is since we have
> complete separation of control-plane and data-plane there
> really isn't anything that drops you into software
> forwarding.
> that in itself is a major benefit - but it does come
On Friday 30 October 2009 08:42:31 am Jared Gillis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to get a lab 7204VXR (NPE-400) up and running
> on SRC code, and am having no luck. I've loaded it up
> with 12.2(33)SRC4 ipbase, and 12.2(33)SRD3 ipbase, and
> the router locks or crashes on boot each time:
>
> C
On Friday 30 October 2009 08:42:31 am Jared Gillis wrote:
> None of the docs I can find say anything more than 7200
> is supported (no breakdown on required NPE or IO
> modules). Has anyone had any luck getting 12.2SR code of
> any kind running on a 7204VXR? If so, any advice? Thanks!
You might w
On 29/10/2009, at 9:58 AM, David Hughes wrote:
On 28/10/2009, at 11:18 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
The smartest/sanest thing to do, IMHO, would be to work at
migrating to NX-OS, feature-set by feature-set. It's by far the
cleanest and best-designed OS platform Cisco have come out with to
On 28 Oct 2009, at 14:47, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Also, to some it might be surprising that the SIP-600 in a 7600 will
not
do QinQ no matter the SPA version, whereas the SIP-400 supposedly will
with a v2 SPA (I haven't had the chance to actually try, and some
documentation says that it won't wor
50 matches
Mail list logo
