- Nick Hilliard n...@inex.ie wrote:
Incidentally, if you're planning to use the N5K as a fancy 1G switch,
note that the system will change the switching mode from cut-through to
store-n-forward for GE ports; cut-through is only supported for 10G
transceivers. This may matter for iSCSI.
Dirk-Jan van Helmond c-...@djvh.nl wrote:
Don't use RSA authentication for automated processes?
Use local accounts, or if your devices support it SSH public keys are a
handy option. To be honest you would be crazy to rely just on RSA
authentication as if your RADIUS server is dead you will
Mark Meijerink mark.meijer...@sara.nl writes:
Is anyone of you using RSA tokens and rancid? If so, please explain how
you make this work. Thanks in advance for your comments.
Friend of mine told me that a combination of a web cam, fuzzyOCR and
some Perl code is working fine for token based
Peter Rathlev wrote:
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the input.
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:23 +, Phil Mayers wrote:
Do you have CoPP or MLS rate limiters? Is the traffic being CPU punted
(use a SPAN session to find out) and this rate-limiting what's causing
the drops?
No CoPP or rate-limiters
HI guys,
Just a quick question. Here's my context
---
CPE1--*QinQ + L2PT port* (7600)--VPLS---(7600) *Trunk
port* --NNI-CPE2
CPE1 and CPE2 run PVST+ and both 7600 don't run any STP
On QinQ + L2PT port (7600), i ran
Packet fragmentation and re-assembly on one path to one of the sites
could explain it.
Maybe 'show ip traffic' could glean some useful information.
--
Ben
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Gert Doering wrote:
No. Routers will never reassemble transit traffic.
Never is a strong word. It seems ip virtual-reassembly do it. It looks
like it at least reassembles them in memory and delays them before
forwarding them (as fragments) from the debug and counters.
On 2009-11-11 12:00, Thomas Habets wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Gert Doering wrote:
No. Routers will never reassemble transit traffic.
Never is a strong word. It seems ip virtual-reassembly do it. It looks
like it at least reassembles them in memory and delays them before
forwarding them (as
Hi,
I am planing to use Cisco 12000 series Two port OC-192 line card.
I would like to have some feedback on this line card.
This line card supports Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH).
Does any one configured it as Gig enabling WAN.
I used SPA-1x10GE-WL-V2 on 12000-SIP-600 as 10Gig enabling
Roland,
iatrogenic. induced inadvertently ...
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/IATROGENIC
It is not often I have to look up a word on this board. Well played sir.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Nov 11, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Peter Rathlev
On 11/11/09 6:03 AM, Jens Link li...@quux.de wrote:
Mark Meijerink mark.meijer...@sara.nl writes:
Is anyone of you using RSA tokens and rancid? If so, please explain how
you make this work. Thanks in advance for your comments.
Friend of mine told me that a combination of a web cam,
There is nothing special about *forwarding* fragmented packets - unless
you have an ACL or anything else that wants to look at Layer 4 info.
That would be Netflow or some QoS policy attached to the interface, for
instance?
I guess the router should reassembly the fragmented packets before
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Pratap Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I am planing to use Cisco 12000 series Two port OC-192 line card.
I would like to have some feedback on this line card.
This line card supports Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH).
Does any one configured it as Gig enabling WAN.
I used
13 matches
Mail list logo
