Guys,
I currently have FreeRadius working with a MySQL back-end to authenticate
VPN users on my 2811 Cisco router. I have been trying to get the
download-able access list feature working but am hitting a brick wall. If i
enable cisco-avpair:=ipsec:inacl=185 i can see the radius server responding
wi
On 04/12/2009, at 1:29 AM, Howard Jones wrote:
> I've just run into an odd problem, and was wondering if anyone else
> could clarify this for me.
>
> [c1]---[Sw1]--[Sw2]---[c2]
>
> c1 and c2 are client devices. Sw1 and Sw2 are 3750Gs with a trunk
> between them. c1 has a trunk to Sw1. On
Just to be complete, here is what's in the box:
cisco WS-C6504-E (R7000) processor (revision 2.0) with 983008K/65536K
bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FOX11460P4W
SR71000 CPU at 600Mhz, Implementation 0x504, Rev 1.2, 512KB L2 Cache
Last reset from s/w reset
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Eninja wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Your snipped 'sh ver' post is inadequate to understand the root cause of
> this problem.
>
> Unicast or broadcast a full 'sh ver' (prior to a reload), 'sh stack', and
> crashinfo files from both SP and RP if available.
>
> eninja
>
Unfort
Andy,
Your snipped 'sh ver' post is inadequate to understand the root cause
of this problem.
Unicast or broadcast a full 'sh ver' (prior to a reload), 'sh stack',
and crashinfo files from both SP and RP if available.
eninja
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:31 PM, "Andy B." wrote:
Hi,
I am fac
I need to terminate 2,000 DSL circuits delievered to me from a telco over a
an ATM DS3. I was hoping someone here could offer some equipment
recommendations that they feel are suitable for terminating this traffic, as
I'm having trouble understanding all the IDB and PVC limits offered by the
diffe
Hi,
I am facing semi-random reloads of one of my routers when it is under
heavy load while receiving lots of routes from its BGP peers.
I run several 6504-E in my backbone, all with the very same IOS and
all interconnected for the same purpose: Edge Routers for BGP peering
/ customers and transit
2009/12/3 Jeff Kell :
> Both of your remote command examples tell me 256M. The active
> supervisor 'show ver' has 512M. And as someone else pointed out, I
> don't think it would be running redundancy if the two didn't match up.
> But it is...
>
>> #sho redundancy states
>> my state = 13 -A
I looked at it again and noticed it's a combination of Netflow being
enabled and ACL Based RBSCP.
It's hard for me to tell without more data if it's an exact match or if
the fix is more generic.
The general recommendation for code direction in regards to 12.4T/15.0 is:
12.4(15)T as it will l
Chris Scott wrote:
> Definitely. Failover to satisfy curiosity on a production system is a
> bit far. The fact they're running in failover suggests their spec
> can't be too different or IOS *hopefully* would have moaned :)
Both of your remote command examples tell me 256M. The active
superviso
Hi Jeff
2009/12/3 Jeff Kell :
> Can you determine the MSFC2 RAM size in a standby supervisor?
On my mix of Sup2/MSFC2s running 12.2(18)SXD7b and 12.2(18)SXF15a I
have "remote command standby-rp sho ver" that does the trick.
> All of the "remote command" options I've tried seem to be giving me th
2009/12/3 Scott McGrath :
> For a LONG time there was a 512MB limitation on filesystem size i.e. the
> Sup720's would recognize a 512MB CF card but not a 1Gb
> card. Until this thread we were not aware that the limitation had been
> lifted on newer code.
> This is helpful as we have been scourin
Hi Howie,
Check out the command
"errdisable detect cause bpduguard shutdown vlan"
Dale
On Dec 3, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Howard Jones wrote:
> I've just run into an odd problem, and was wondering if anyone else
> could clarify this for me.
>
> [c1]---[Sw1]--[Sw2]---[c2]
>
> c1 and c2 are c
see in-line:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
> sky vader wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just curious, since the default bandwidth for tunnel interface is 9k
>> (cisco platform), does that mean the maximum bandwidth I can have is 9k?
>
> No.
-
So what does tunnel "bandwidth transmit / receive" s
Can you determine the MSFC2 RAM size in a standby supervisor?
All of the "remote command" options I've tried seem to be giving me the
PFC, not MSFC2; and any typical session/console to the standby sup of
course gives me the 'standby console disabled' message.
The active Sup2 was replaced awhile b
By security issues I was thinking something like a MAC flooding or any kind
of denial of service which could compromise the switch access so I would
have the internal LAN exposed. Is this make sense?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Marcelo Zilio
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> >There is an option they supply the switch too.
> >The first thing that came to mind is security issues since we are
> >connecting
> >Internet and Local Network to the same switch inside the network.
[..]
> Usually I'd say
The 'Adjust Regions' process is not an issue here. The real problem is the
interrupt part of the load (49%). That means your switch handles large
amount of traffic in software. Do you use IPv6 or other features that are
not supported by hardware in you current SDM profile?
Ivan
On Monday 16 N
I've just run into an odd problem, and was wondering if anyone else
could clarify this for me.
[c1]---[Sw1]--[Sw2]---[c2]
c1 and c2 are client devices. Sw1 and Sw2 are 3750Gs with a trunk
between them. c1 has a trunk to Sw1. One of the vlans in that trunk as
passed along the sw1-sw2 trunk
For a LONG time there was a 512MB limitation on filesystem size i.e. the
Sup720's would recognize a 512MB CF card but not a 1Gb
card.Until this thread we were not aware that the limitation had
been lifted on newer code.
This is helpful as we have been scouring the universe for old 512Mb C
Definitely upgrade your software before anything else.
--
Randy
-- Original Message ---
From: Chris Scott
To: nm...@guesswho.com, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:57:08 +
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CompactFlash card compatibility
> 2009/12/3 :
> > Chris,
> > Is
2009/12/3 :
> Chris,
> Is it possible that you need the WS-CF-UPG aka CF-ADAPTER-SP for your older
> SUP. I think it is included in the newer 720s
> Nick
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Sc
Chris,
Is it possible that you need the WS-CF-UPG aka CF-ADAPTER-SP for your older
SUP. I think it is included in the newer 720s
Nick
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Scott
Sent: Thursday, December
2009/12/2 Brian Fitzgerald :
> We have been using the Kingston CF/4GB Type I - they work fine, with same
> caveat as Randy posted - format them in the Sup first.
I have a 2-week old Sup720-3B running 12.2(33)SXI3 that formats and
can use a Kingston CF/1GB no probs. My other Sup720-3B is 4 years o
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Marcelo Zilio wrote:
There is an option they supply the switch too.
The first thing that came to mind is security issues since we are connecting
Internet and Local Network to the same switch inside the network.
That's like saying there is a security risk in running two phon
Hi,
I'm facing a new situation. We are exchanging our Service Provider for MPLS
and Internet links.
We have requested them redundant MPLS and Internet connections. At the HQ
site they gave us Ethernet interfaces as media access. So far so good.
The problem is that this Service Provider gave us tw
Hi all,
I am researching ideas/solutions for building a centralized/redundant OOB
management/dialer system. The purpose will be to provide a couple of
geographically distributed systems with a modem (or more) attached
(preferably logically attached) for connecting to remote offices when their
pri
27 matches
Mail list logo
