Hello!
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 08:48:27PM -0800, Yuri Bank wrote:
> Why can't DSL signals pass through fiber optics, yet we have HFC networks
> that obviously have no issues going from copper to fiber.
> The modulation techniques DOCSIS and DSL use are similar, so what prevents
> this from workin
Why can't DSL signals pass through fiber optics, yet we have HFC networks
that obviously have no issues going from copper to fiber.
The modulation techniques DOCSIS and DSL use are similar, so what prevents
this from working with DSL? Is it that the RF is to weak and the conversion
process messes u
My experiences are quite the opposite, pretty much a crash once every two
weeks on macbook pros for the last 4 years.
Kaj
> From: "Tolstykh, Andrew"
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:04:07 -0800
> To: Kaj Niemi , Ian Henderson , Marc Haber
>
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Wind
Yes (at least cisco ASA, not sure about IOS) will works fine with the built
in Windows client. (particularly useful for windows mobile devices without
begin extorted for a SSL vpn license, and then a mobile license on top of
it!). The only issue is without using certs, there's no tunnel-group
tar
Never had one in the last two years (10.5 through 10.6.2), connected
pretty much constantly.
TIA,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kaj Niemi
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:03 AM
To: Ian Henderson
What is about the built in vpn-client from windows? Connect to a Cisco ASA
should be possible? Any experiances, someone?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether
This is the document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12
.2SX/configuration/guide/qos.html
As you most likely want to apply a policy for a specific VLAN on a
trunk, you should look at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12
.
Hi,
Agreed. The Cisco IPSec Client on OS X is notorious causing kernel panics.
;-(
Kaj
> From: Ian Henderson
> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:13:31 -0800
> To: Marc Haber
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
>
> - I'm not 100% keen on the Mac client. Its clunky and obtrusi
Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E R WP EN 342) wrote:
Can you recommend some good ones?
Freeware/Opensource is no requirement.
Testing req:
Http sessions
Tcp sessions
Udp strams
Multicast
Voice (QoS)
I mostly have used open source tools in the past; a brief rundown...
iperf is a nice simple
Can you recommend some good ones?
Freeware/Opensource is no requirement.
Testing req:
Http sessions
Tcp sessions
Udp strams
Multicast
Voice (QoS)
Utilization test
Failover response times (should be done in hw)
(( Ulrich
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi list-
Appreciate your guidance on the following question.
We have two Catalyst 6509 interconnected over fiber with a number of
VLANs shared between two switches. I setup another VLAN with two
ports in total (one port on each switch) and would like to give the
highest priority to traffic trave
I was just wondering, what kind of VPN software people use for Windows
mobile to connect to Cisco. I know, Anyconnecy is one option. But what
about IPSEC?
Aivars
> Gert Doering writes:
>> Not that they are willing to ship an IPSEC VPN client for 64 bit windows...
> There are vendors other th
12 matches
Mail list logo