[c-nsp] clue-bat requested for v6 loopback into IGP

After a long day, I'm certain that I'm missing something simple. I'm trying to get a loopback address advertised into OSPF, after a direct ptp setup has already been established ( I can ping6 from ptp interface to ptp interface ). I'm working from a C2961, and in this case, its peer is Quagga. I h

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SB or 12.2SRC/SRD on 7200?

On Friday 18 December 2009 02:56:29 am Chris Wopat wrote: > I'm enabling MPLS on a network that contains 7200VXR's > with NPE-400s that have PA-FE and IO-FE cards and are > currently 12.4 mainline. 12.4 mainline does not support > MTU > 1500 for FE interfaces on this platform > (CSCsc62963). I

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

Clyde, I don't think I'm following your example with mine. But, it sounds like I need EEM 3.0 to get the BGP functionality that I'm looking for. Once again thanks for your help! tv - Original Message - From: "Clyde Wildes" To: "'Tony Varriale'" ; Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

> How about you individually move each connection over to the secondary > switch one at a time. This should only be a 30 second downtime > window per port, I'd think? Once you've migrated everybody off of > the primary switch, pull it, upgrade it and then move everybody back > one-by-one? Th

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

>> Very good points. And that is our design. However, lack of strict >> adherence to our standard has led to two problems. First, several servers >> didn't get cabled with two connections. Second, the folks who manage the >> servers have challenges with the NIC configurations. So while we expect >>

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

> Manny, > > Very good points. And that is our design. However, lack of strict > adherence to our standard has led to two problems. First, several servers > didn't get cabled with two connections. Second, the folks who manage the > servers have challenges with the NIC configurations. So while we ex

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

> Chris, > > If you already have the redundancy in place with the old hardware, it > should be as simple as migrating one side of the pair of switches. This > way the customer is always up and running and you can switch them over > to the new gear seamlessly and then replace the other side with

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

> What's the current architecture? > > tv Tony, Good question. For this portion of the data center it is more traditional. By that I mean these 6509 switches provide the Layer 2 connections to the servers. The 6509s have dual uplinks to an Agg layer. The Agg layer hosts the default gateways using

Re: [c-nsp] Egress QoS on FE links with less than 100Mbps speeds

Lobo wrote: > Wow thanks Daniel that did the trick on the 3750 platform! Here's a > sample config in case anyone ever needs it: > interface FastEthernet1/0/23 > srr-queue bandwidth limit 80 Glad to hear that worked. Be aware that bandwidth limiting on these platforms is not an exact science -

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/17/09 5:25 PM, ch...@lavin-llc.com wrote: > Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects. > > For those of you that provide or support large data centers, I have a > situation that I'd like to pick your brains about. > > We

Re: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

What's the current architecture? tv - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:25 PM Subject: [c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects. For those of you that provide or support large data center

[c-nsp] Data Center switch replacement

Sometimes the simplest things can grow into the biggest projects. For those of you that provide or support large data centers, I have a situation that I'd like to pick your brains about. We have some older switch gear that needs replaced because line cards are beyond MTBF and several have failed

Re: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP

CTS isn't needed for synchronous serial so i thought? The only time you would need clear to send is if you are asynchronous...or so i thought. My impression was that those pins were not tied to anything typically. And the wires would be tied back to DCD. Not sure i'm correct, but logically I do

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

Tony, "event timer countdown time 120" means that the applet BGPADJ_NOSHUT will run once, two minutes after it is added to the config. For EEM v2.2 in place of "action 150 publish-event sub-system 798 type 100 arg1 "shutdown"" you could add policy B to the config. Policy B would then run once, 12

Re: [c-nsp] EEM BGP

Clyde, Thanks so much for your help. This appears to work well. I did try and map this into a 12.4(15)T/EEM 2.2 and it appears to work. I'm just not sure how. Here's the 2.2 config: event manager applet BGPADJ_SHUT event syslog occurs 2 pattern "%BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 172.16.10.3 Down"

Re: [c-nsp] IP accounting vs. NetFlow

*ugh* I really, really need a vacation! I could have sworn the netflow side was set to bytes, but it wasn't... that was the difference. Thanks! Sorry... a little brain damage on my part... Steve Pfister Technical Coordinator, The Office of Information Technology Dayton Public Schools 115 S. Lud

[c-nsp] IP accounting vs. NetFlow

I'm trying to diagnose some bandwidth problems at one particular remote site. At the moment, I'm concentrating on one particular server (a Novell site server, looking at NCP packets...tcp port 524 outbound from that server to addresses outside of that remote site). I turned on ip accounting fo

[c-nsp] 12.2SB or 12.2SRC/SRD on 7200?

I'm enabling MPLS on a network that contains 7200VXR's with NPE-400s that have PA-FE and IO-FE cards and are currently 12.4 mainline. 12.4 mainline does not support MTU > 1500 for FE interfaces on this platform (CSCsc62963). I've had one box running SB stable for about two months. I also tested 12.

Re: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP

Cts is clear to send. It sounds like you have a physical problem with the line. On Dec 17, 2009 1:09 PM, "Marcelo Zilio" wrote: Hi, Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before? Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down besides a lot CRCs/Input Errors. It doesn'

Re: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP

> -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marcelo Zilio > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 10:04 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP > > Hi, > > Has anyone seen

[c-nsp] Serial link CTS=down link UP

Hi, Has anyone seen this in serial interfaces before? Link is UP and traffic is going through, however router shows CTS=down besides a lot CRCs/Input Errors. It doesn't make sense to me the parameter which should advise that the link is "ready to go" is DOWN while there is traffic on it. Users are

[c-nsp] PBR on virtual-access interfaces with easy-vpn

Hello, I am using easy-vpn on my routers. I want to be able to PBR inbound traffic (coming from the IPSec tunnel) to force it down a different path than the one in the routing table. I have applied PBR on the virtual-template, based on the different show commands I issued, it is taken i

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco AIRONET WPA-Enterprise w/Windows question..

If you use APs that support PEAP, you might consider using outsourced services, such as AuthenticateMyWiFi . You don't have to mess with setting up your own RADIUS server. Plus it works for multiple locations, unlike traditional servers.

[c-nsp] PE Monitoring Tools

Dear All, Kindly i am working in a Service Provider environment We have daily upgrade in the network and moving customer from one PE to another PE Is there is any Management tool can check the status of the Customer (VRF) before and after the migration of the customer to another PE ?

Re: [c-nsp] Egress QoS on FE links with less than 100Mbps speeds

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:40:10AM -0500, Lobo wrote: > Hi Peter. The reason why the radio only works at less than 100M is > because that's all the bandwidth it has. This is licensed based > wireless technology for point to point shots between buildings. > Bandwidths can be anywhere from 18M

Re: [c-nsp] Egress QoS on FE links with less than 100Mbps speeds

Hi Peter. The reason why the radio only works at less than 100M is because that's all the bandwidth it has. This is licensed based wireless technology for point to point shots between buildings. Bandwidths can be anywhere from 18M to 400M depending on which frequency you use and radio brand.

Re: [c-nsp] Egress QoS on FE links with less than 100Mbps speeds

Wow thanks Daniel that did the trick on the 3750 platform! Here's a sample config in case anyone ever needs it: interface FastEthernet1/0/23 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 666-670 switchport mode trunk load-interval 30 srr-queue bandwidth share 1 25 35 4

[c-nsp] SNMP check of ospf neighbors in SRD2a?

It looks like we lost the ability to check OSPF neighbors via snmp in SRD? See below Host xx.xx.222.194 is running 12.2(33r)SRC3 Host xx.xx.208.1 was just upgraded to 12.2(33)SRD2a (and both checks below really are checking neighbors that ARE in a full state, verified from the CLI) r...@tnw

[c-nsp] NEXUS Family - Success full experience in unified SAN/LAN?

Hi, I would like to know if anyone is using NEXUS (7000/5000/2000) in unification of fiber channel and Ethernet in one network. Did it allow to save cost? Is it a major advantage towards traditional isolated equipment LAN/SAN? Was major issues brought up over simple things like LACP, QoS.. ?

Re: [c-nsp] FWSM logging problem

To answer all questions about versions e.d. We are running 3.1(4), not the latest I know, but people here are 'allergic' to network downtime and with semester exams coming up, I won't be able to upgrade before February. I removed the log option from the rule which should have given me 106023 messa