On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Sven 'Darkman' Michels wrote:
>
> Now the problem: ping from 6509:
>
> c6509#ping ip xx.xx.xx.13 repeat 5
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to xx.xx.xx.13, timeout is 2 seconds:
> ..!.!
>
Your basic PVLAN configuration looks good.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Security Team wrote:
> What is the "right" way to combine IP layer 3 traffic so that it can go to
> multiple VLANs? I'm working with a Catalyst 65xx setup.
>
> For example, I am starting from a working setup that looks something like
> this:
>
> interface GigabitE
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
> We are aware of what the entire card is capable of (2 Gb/s), but is there
> any way to see how much is being utilized from within IOS itself? We can
> start counting up all the ports but is there an easier way? ;)
>
> Relating to this, is t
On 31 Jan 2010, at 03:18, Kevin Warwashana wrote:
> I was able to use the below configuration and it appears to max out the
> connection pretty close to 26mb. I did have to tinker with the queue size
> since the default (3300+) would allow traffic to exceed and a size of 5
> didn't seem to work
Matt Buford wrote:
Each range of 8 ports (1-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48) has an ASIC.
Each ASIC can do a max of 1 Gb in each direction. If all ports on a group
of 8 were to upload and download, their combined throughput would be 1 Gb
upload and 1 Gb download. If all ports on the card
Thanks to everyone for the on-list/off-list replies. We were of the
understanding it was 2Gb/s which I was obviously wrong on - this keeps us
"out of trouble" for the time being thankfully.
No etherchannel on these cards neither ;)
Cheers,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Pete Templin [m
I have the same config as your example, but created the additional
policy-map first in order to apply it. It didn't take so it was missing
from policy-map 26MB-OUTPUT. Looks to be a feature limitation of the
SIP-600.
I am running 12.2.33 SRD3. Looks like my only option is to shape and not
polic
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:42:27AM +0300, Mikisa Richard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Any ideas why the Policer policy below does not work. Intention is for
> me to lock down traffic to 3Mbps both ways on interface g3/11.
>
> !!
> class-map match-all ROKE-LIMIT
>match access-group name ROKE-SLAP
> !
Hello,
I'm facing a strange problem I think that is a QoS configuration, I've tried
some conf without success. The situation is as follows:
Actually I have a 1Mbps Serial link between two remote branchs and one
application in particular: a SQL client/server application that works fine.
(there are
Hi Omar,
No you definively should not take any special considerations for Metro
link - you are the end customer the service is transparent to you - it
moves packets back and forth.
Therefore it is hard to tell what is the actual problem. It is easy to
troubleshoot though - sniff it:
a) sniff the
Hi Pavel,
Unfortunately I'm in a remote location but I'm thinking about install a
WireShark in a client PC.
Rgds. & Thanks.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Pavel Skovajsa
wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> No you definively should not take any special considerations for Metro
> link - you are the end cust
On 29/01/2010, at 6:54 AM, Livio Zanol Puppim wrote:
> Can anyone please tell me the advantages of using Nexus 2000 over Catalyst
> 4948 as access layers switches?
> Using Nexus 2000, I have to use at least 2 ports at my Nexus 5000, that
> could be used by servers with 10GbE/FCoE servers.
The N2
Hi all,
UPDATE:
Turned out the policer was fine. Just a small tweak on the ACL got it to
work. Otherwise grateful for all the help
Richard
On 1/31/2010 6:39 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:42:27AM +0300, Mikisa Richard wrote:
Hi all,
Any ideas why the Policer policy
13 matches
Mail list logo
