On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:20:14 +0100, you wrote:
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=Catalyst 6000 Blank Line Card Slot Cover
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR-E= Catalyst 6500 Enhanced chassis line card slot cover
I have to ask. What's 'enhanced' about the second piece of metal?
The metal isn't enhanced. It's for the 6500-E
Jason,
This looks like CSCte69575 Etherchannel on HWIC-1FE not working.
I suggest you open a TAC case about it, to verify that this is the same
case (the above bug is for the 2900 platform, but my guess these are the
same).
Also, I am not sure right now in which release the fix is integrated.
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:20:14PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=Catalyst 6000 Blank Line Card Slot Cover
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR-E= Catalyst 6500 Enhanced chassis line card slot cover
I have to ask. What's 'enhanced' about the second piece of
Turning up a backup BGP session with a secondary provider. Currently accepting
a default route from my primary provider and will have full table from
secondary. Would like to continue to have the primary provider as the preferred
inbound/outbound path once i've turned up the secondary session.
Hi. I have a cisco sge2010p small business switch I'm trying to get working
with IGMP (for Windows Deployment Services imaging on 2008r2). This is a
simple single-segment lan; no multicast router. This is the only switch. I
cannot get the switch to stop sending the multicast to all ports
Hi,
We seem to have a issue with port-channel load-balancing between two
of our VSS instances. On both VSS sides we configured 8
interfaces to 1 port-channel.
At some point we see packetloss between servers connected to both VSS
instances when we put production traffic on it.
We have 4
I will be out of the office starting 04/13/2010 and will not return until
04/18/2010.
If there are any urgent issues please call me or text me on my mobile.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Bob,
There are a lot of configuration options to do this.
A simple solution for this, hereby I assume that your secondary neighbor is
accepting (default) bgp communities.
Primary neighbor (default route): 1.1.1.1 AS10
Secondary neighbor (full table): 2.2.2.2 AS20
Local AS: AS30
Local
Hello Community,
I am trying / testing the following features :
- BGP Multipath Load Sharing for Both eBGP and iBGP in an MPLS-VPN.
- MPLS VPN--BGP Local Convergence
The objective is to provide our clients L3 VPN/MPLS clients with :
- Simple redundancy (active DSL link / backup DSL
We have a project of connecting 30+ remote parking gates to our PCI
private network(MPLS L3VPN in our case). These parking gates will not
have direct ethernet connection, nor within our campus wireless
coverage. So we are thinking of using 3G celluar network like Verizon,
ATT etc to have network
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Koen wrote:
I read somewhere on the cisco site that VSS doesn't want to send traffic
over the VSL link between the physical switches...
This is correct - no matter what show etherc load-balance hash-result or
show ip cef exact-route says, the VSS will
Built something similar using DMVPN
ISR 881 connected to DMVPN HUB at C7206-G2
But a smaller ISR as DMVPN HUB should be fine
Jon Harald Bøvre
Fra: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
p#229; vegne av schilling
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5024 (20100413
I'm having a tremendously iffy time finding replacement parts for a GSR 12810,
does anyone know of a good place to get these items?
12000/10/16-BLWER= and 12000/10-FILTER=
Sorry if this is a 'sales' type email on a technical forum but I am scratching
my head..
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of schilling
Sent: martedì 13 aprile 2010 16.58
To: Luan Nguyen
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G
We talked about 880s,
Hi
i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
rfc 2370.
--Pritesh
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid
ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net
5250 obsoletes 2370
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5250
On 4/13/10 2:31 PM, Pritesh Patel wrote:
rfc 2370.
--Pritesh
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid
ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ?
thanks
This is a little off-topic, but I'm hoping to find some recommendations on
small (1RU-3RU), manageable N+1 rectifiers...to power some Cisco gear we've
got in our lab. The most we'd need is probably 25A at -48VDC, maybe
something around 2500-3000W total.
The last time I bought a rectifier, it was
Eltek/Valere
http://www.eltekvalere.com/wip4/telecom/c/detail_product.epl?cat=11074
--
Tim
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Cobb sc...@telecoast.com wrote:
This is a little off-topic, but I'm hoping to find some recommendations on
small (1RU-3RU), manageable N+1 rectifiers...to power
The behavior you describe sounds correct. IGMP snooping depends on IGMP
traffic in order to have something to snoop. Without an IGMP querier, you
can only count on the initial (unsolicited) IGMP host report. There might
be no other traffic, rendering IGMP snooping is totally helpless. It
Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration frontend
people have settled on for Nagios. I have been running Nagios for years now
just with a flat configuration file, but I'd like to extend the
configuration tasks to others besides myself, and a web based GUI frontend
seems
On 13 April 2010 16:58, Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration frontend
people have settled on for Nagios. I have been running Nagios for years now
just with a flat configuration file, but I'd like to extend the
configuration
I started looking into this, as I'm in a similar situation as Eric,
and found that newer versions of OpenNMS does 99% of what I'm doing with
Nagios and Cacti now, so I'm in a slow migration to that. Might be
worth checking out the 1.7.x releases, a lot of new features have been
added. I'll
Using nagiosql without any problems. Seems pretty robust and works with v3.x.
Chuck
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Walter Keen
walter.k...@rainierconnect.net wrote:
I started looking into this, as I'm in a similar situation as Eric, and
found that newer versions of OpenNMS does 99% of what
We went with opsview.
Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration
frontend
people have settled on for Nagios. I have been running Nagios for
years now
just with a flat configuration file,
We use Fruity (Lilac requires PHP 5.2 and CentOS doesn't/didn't have rpms,
looks like they are in the 5.2 is in CentOS-Testing now though) and Nconf (two
different servers).
Fruity/Lilac works well but isn't perfect. There are a few small features/bugs
that would make it much better:
-Copy
With Fruity/Lilac, can you choose to update the config via the CLI as well
as via the GUI, or is the config locked from making manual changes?
I ask because you mentioned repetitive changes not being easy with the GUI.
-- Eric Cables
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tony Bunce
I did look at OpsView, and it looked like a good candidate for testing,
unfortunately my platform is FreeBSD and it doesn't appear to be supported.
-- Eric Cables
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.netwrote:
We went with opsview.
Ryan
On Apr 13, 2010, at
Ryan Goldberg wrote:
We went with opsview.
So did we, and then went back to writing the configs for Nagios
ourselves through sheer frustration at the equivalent of painting fine
art with gardening gloves and a fat brush.
Poggs
___
cisco-nsp
I'm curious as to whether or not Cisco's 3G HWIC's can somehow be aggregated
(through IOS or not) in order to essentially get an Nx3G amount of bandwidth
over a single carrier's network...haven't found any luck googling.
Cisco says the only option is to use multiple carriers, if in the same
Hi,
Anyone have experience configuring Cisco ME-4924-10GE QoS. I wonder
how to achieve queue-limit configuration.
I'm using IOS 12.2(53)SG1.
Regards,
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
This should help, unless you've already checked it out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/52sg/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1437305
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/52sg/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1437305
-sc
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010
33 matches
Mail list logo