Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 65/7600 Switch Module Blanks

2010-04-13 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:20:14 +0100, you wrote: WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=Catalyst 6000 Blank Line Card Slot Cover WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR-E= Catalyst 6500 Enhanced chassis line card slot cover I have to ask. What's 'enhanced' about the second piece of metal? The metal isn't enhanced. It's for the 6500-E

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7200 - IOS15.1 - Port-channel

2010-04-13 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Jason, This looks like CSCte69575 Etherchannel on HWIC-1FE not working. I suggest you open a TAC case about it, to verify that this is the same case (the above bug is for the 2900 platform, but my guess these are the same). Also, I am not sure right now in which release the fix is integrated.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 65/7600 Switch Module Blanks

2010-04-13 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:20:14PM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=Catalyst 6000 Blank Line Card Slot Cover WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR-E= Catalyst 6500 Enhanced chassis line card slot cover I have to ask. What's 'enhanced' about the second piece of

[c-nsp] BGP Multi-homing

2010-04-13 Thread bobby hajhassan
Turning up a backup BGP session with a secondary provider. Currently accepting a default route from my primary provider and will have full table from secondary. Would like to continue to have the primary provider as the preferred inbound/outbound path once i've turned up the secondary session.

[c-nsp] IGMP snooping/multicast on cisco SGE2010p

2010-04-13 Thread Craig
Hi. I have a cisco sge2010p small business switch I'm trying to get working with IGMP (for Windows Deployment Services imaging on 2008r2). This is a simple single-segment lan; no multicast router. This is the only switch. I cannot get the switch to stop sending the multicast to all ports

[c-nsp] Port-channel weirdness VSS

2010-04-13 Thread Koen
Hi, We seem to have a issue with port-channel load-balancing between two of our VSS instances. On both VSS sides we configured 8 interfaces to 1 port-channel. At some point we see packetloss between servers connected to both VSS instances when we put production traffic on it. We have 4

[c-nsp] Tarig Hamdi is out of the office.

2010-04-13 Thread Tarig Hamdi
I will be out of the office starting 04/13/2010 and will not return until 04/18/2010. If there are any urgent issues please call me or text me on my mobile. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Multi-homing

2010-04-13 Thread Tim Vollebregt
Hi Bob, There are a lot of configuration options to do this. A simple solution for this, hereby I assume that your secondary neighbor is accepting (default) bgp communities. Primary neighbor (default route): 1.1.1.1 AS10 Secondary neighbor (full table): 2.2.2.2 AS20 Local AS: AS30 Local

[c-nsp] Cisco BGP Multipath Load Sharing for Both eBGP and iBGP in an MPLS-VPN / MPLS VPN--BGP Local Convergence

2010-04-13 Thread Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Hello Community, I am trying / testing the following features : - BGP Multipath Load Sharing for Both eBGP and iBGP in an MPLS-VPN. - MPLS VPN--BGP Local Convergence The objective is to provide our clients L3 VPN/MPLS clients with : - Simple redundancy (active DSL link / backup DSL

[c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G

2010-04-13 Thread schilling
We have a project of connecting 30+ remote parking gates to our PCI private network(MPLS L3VPN in our case). These parking gates will not have direct ethernet connection, nor within our campus wireless coverage. So we are thinking of using 3G celluar network like Verizon, ATT etc to have network

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel weirdness VSS

2010-04-13 Thread Brandon Ewing
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Koen wrote: I read somewhere on the cisco site that VSS doesn't want to send traffic over the VSL link between the physical switches... This is correct - no matter what show etherc load-balance hash-result or show ip cef exact-route says, the VSS will

Re: [c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G

2010-04-13 Thread Bøvre Jon Harald
Built something similar using DMVPN ISR 881 connected to DMVPN HUB at C7206-G2 But a smaller ISR as DMVPN HUB should be fine Jon Harald Bøvre Fra: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] p#229; vegne av schilling

Re: [c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G

2010-04-13 Thread schilling
___ cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5024 (20100413

[c-nsp] Parts sourcing for GSR

2010-04-13 Thread Drew Weaver
I'm having a tremendously iffy time finding replacement parts for a GSR 12810, does anyone know of a good place to get these items? 12000/10/16-BLWER= and 12000/10-FILTER= Sorry if this is a 'sales' type email on a technical forum but I am scratching my head.. -Drew

Re: [c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G

2010-04-13 Thread Brian Turnbow
-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of schilling Sent: martedì 13 aprile 2010 16.58 To: Luan Nguyen Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Remote Parking Gates VPN to Campus Network with 3G We talked about 880s,

[c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

2010-04-13 Thread Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Hi i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ? thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

2010-04-13 Thread Pritesh Patel
rfc 2370. --Pritesh On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ? thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF LSA Type 11

2010-04-13 Thread Shimol Shah
5250 obsoletes 2370 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5250 On 4/13/10 2:31 PM, Pritesh Patel wrote: rfc 2370. --Pritesh On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi i want to know the role of OSPF Opaque LSA Type 11 in MPLS TE ? thanks

[c-nsp] DC rectifier recommendations

2010-04-13 Thread Stephen Cobb
This is a little off-topic, but I'm hoping to find some recommendations on small (1RU-3RU), manageable N+1 rectifiers...to power some Cisco gear we've got in our lab. The most we'd need is probably 25A at -48VDC, maybe something around 2500-3000W total. The last time I bought a rectifier, it was

Re: [c-nsp] DC rectifier recommendations

2010-04-13 Thread Tim Jackson
Eltek/Valere http://www.eltekvalere.com/wip4/telecom/c/detail_product.epl?cat=11074 -- Tim On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Cobb sc...@telecoast.com wrote: This is a little off-topic, but I'm hoping to find some recommendations on small (1RU-3RU), manageable N+1 rectifiers...to power

Re: [c-nsp] IGMP differences between c3560 c4948

2010-04-13 Thread vince anton
The behavior you describe sounds correct. IGMP snooping depends on IGMP traffic in order to have something to snoop. Without an IGMP querier, you can only count on the initial (unsolicited) IGMP host report. There might be no other traffic, rendering IGMP snooping is totally helpless. It

[c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Eric Cables
Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration frontend people have settled on for Nagios. I have been running Nagios for years now just with a flat configuration file, but I'd like to extend the configuration tasks to others besides myself, and a web based GUI frontend seems

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Jeremy Parr
On 13 April 2010 16:58, Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration frontend people have settled on for Nagios.  I have been running Nagios for years now just with a flat configuration file, but I'd like to extend the configuration

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Walter Keen
I started looking into this, as I'm in a similar situation as Eric, and found that newer versions of OpenNMS does 99% of what I'm doing with Nagios and Cacti now, so I'm in a slow migration to that. Might be worth checking out the 1.7.x releases, a lot of new features have been added. I'll

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Charles Mills
Using nagiosql without any problems. Seems pretty robust and works with v3.x. Chuck On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net wrote:  I started looking into this, as I'm in a similar situation as Eric, and found that newer versions of OpenNMS does 99% of what

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Ryan Goldberg
We went with opsview. Ryan On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Eric Cables ecab...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if this is a bit OT, but I was wondering what configuration frontend people have settled on for Nagios. I have been running Nagios for years now just with a flat configuration file,

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Tony Bunce
We use Fruity (Lilac requires PHP 5.2 and CentOS doesn't/didn't have rpms, looks like they are in the 5.2 is in CentOS-Testing now though) and Nconf (two different servers). Fruity/Lilac works well but isn't perfect. There are a few small features/bugs that would make it much better: -Copy

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Eric Cables
With Fruity/Lilac, can you choose to update the config via the CLI as well as via the GUI, or is the config locked from making manual changes? I ask because you mentioned repetitive changes not being easy with the GUI. -- Eric Cables On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tony Bunce

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Eric Cables
I did look at OpsView, and it looked like a good candidate for testing, unfortunately my platform is FreeBSD and it doesn't appear to be supported. -- Eric Cables On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.netwrote: We went with opsview. Ryan On Apr 13, 2010, at

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios config frontends

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Hicks
Ryan Goldberg wrote: We went with opsview. So did we, and then went back to writing the configs for Nagios ourselves through sheer frustration at the equivalent of painting fine art with gardening gloves and a fat brush. Poggs ___ cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] Bonding multiple 3G HWIC signals?

2010-04-13 Thread Stephen Cobb
I'm curious as to whether or not Cisco's 3G HWIC's can somehow be aggregated (through IOS or not) in order to essentially get an Nx3G amount of bandwidth over a single carrier's network...haven't found any luck googling. Cisco says the only option is to use multiple carriers, if in the same

[c-nsp] Cisco ME-4924-10GE QoS configuration

2010-04-13 Thread Rizal
Hi, Anyone have experience configuring Cisco ME-4924-10GE QoS. I wonder how to achieve queue-limit configuration. I'm using IOS 12.2(53)SG1. Regards, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME-4924-10GE QoS configuration

2010-04-13 Thread Stephen Cobb
This should help, unless you've already checked it out: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/52sg/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1437305 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12.2/52sg/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1437305 -sc On Tue, Apr 13, 2010