Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread Mike
For an additonal data point, the error has not recurred. HOWEVER, all across my network (wireless ISP), I have been having 'events' with all sorts of malfunctioning equipment; I've had blown out microwave point to point links, locked up wireless access points and strange rebootings, all in

[c-nsp] HP IC-DEGX2-TA nw card bonding / etherchannel?

2010-04-29 Thread Garry
Hi, a customer of ours is running a box with two HP IC-DEGX2-TA Dualport-GigE network cards, configured for bonding to bundle the 4 gig of capacity under one IP. Does anybody know whether these will continue to work with Cisco switches (2960 etc.)? I've tried to find tech info on the card, but

Re: [c-nsp] Access-list not working on eth sub if

2010-04-29 Thread Rodney Dunn
If you want to drop it try a route-map with a service policy and set in Null0. Seem to recall that works. Rodney On 4/28/10 9:58 PM, Lincoln Dale wrote: On 29/04/2010, at 8:15 AM, james edwards wrote: The access-lists seem to not work when configed out but works fine configured in ACLs

Re: [c-nsp] HP IC-DEGX2-TA nw card bonding / etherchannel?

2010-04-29 Thread Ryan West
Garry, -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:12 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] HP IC-DEGX2-TA nw card bonding / etherchannel? Hi, a customer of ours is running a box with two HP IC-DEGX2-TA Dualport-GigE network cards, configured for bonding to

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread Chris Woodfield
In my experience, a PMPE error is usually exactly what it sounds like - a flipped bit in RAM that the ECC was unable to correct. If you don't run into another one anytime soon, you're probably OK - occasional electromagnetic (or even cosmic ray) interference can cause this - but if you get

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread Chris Woodfield
You may want to check your power feeds for unexplained variances in voltage or phase... -C On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:13 51AM, Mike wrote: For an additonal data point, the error has not recurred. HOWEVER, all across my network (wireless ISP), I have been having 'events' with all sorts of

[c-nsp] Weird Web Browsing Issues On ADSL Circuit

2010-04-29 Thread Dominic
Hi Everyone: I have an ADSL customer who uses a Cisco 1841 CPE for Bonded ADSL. Circuit has worked perfectly for the past one year, but all of a sudden, out of nowhere, web browsing suddenly stopped working! yesterday Now, every other type of traffic -VPN, FTP, SMTP, PING, DNS, etc - still

[c-nsp] CN=Jesus Leung/OU=AHM/OU=AM/O=HONDA is out of the office.

2010-04-29 Thread jesus_leung
I will be out of the office starting 04/29/2010 and will not return until 05/03/2010. I will respond to your message when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please contact Network Operations at 310-783-2518 and someone will be able to assist you.

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Web Browsing Issues On ADSL Circuit

2010-04-29 Thread Rick Ernst
Transparent (or explicit) cache/proxy somewhere? What happens if you simulate an HTTP transaction via telnet? On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Dominic domi...@broadconnect.ca wrote: Hi Everyone: I have an ADSL customer who uses a Cisco 1841 CPE for Bonded ADSL. Circuit has worked perfectly

[c-nsp] %MLSCEF-SPSTBY-2-FIB_TCAM_WRITE_INCONSISTENCY: FIB TCAM Mismatch

2010-04-29 Thread Drew Weaver
Noticed this error today on a 6509 /w Sup720-3BXLs: Apr 29 14:22:52 EDT: %MLSCEF-SPSTBY-2-FIB_TCAM_WRITE_INCONSISTENCY: FIB TCAM Mismatch for value: Index: 987137 Expected: Entry: 0x00-0x-0x Hardware: Entry: 0x00-0x0001-0xDFC0 This is the first time I have ever seen

Re: [c-nsp] HP IC-DEGX2-TA nw card bonding / etherchannel?

2010-04-29 Thread Garry
On 29.04.2010 14:49, Ryan West wrote: a customer of ours is running a box with two HP IC-DEGX2-TA Dualport-GigE network cards, configured for bonding to bundle the 4 gig of capacity under one IP. Does anybody know whether these will continue to work with Cisco switches (2960 etc.)? I've tried

[c-nsp] CSS 11501 and non-HTTP protocols

2010-04-29 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
Is the CSS 11501 able to load balance non-HTTP protocols like IMAPS? For IMAPS I don't need SSL offloading, plain TCP passed through to the bankend servers and the backend wil do the SSL processing. -- Jeff Ollie ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] CSS 11501 and non-HTTP protocols

2010-04-29 Thread Tony Varriale
Of course! tv - Original Message - From: Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:43 PM Subject: [c-nsp] CSS 11501 and non-HTTP protocols Is the CSS 11501 able to load balance non-HTTP protocols like IMAPS? For IMAPS I

Re: [c-nsp] CSS 11501 and non-HTTP protocols

2010-04-29 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net wrote: Of course! Care to share any pointers to docs or sample configs? -- Jeff Ollie ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] clustered switches and access-class

2010-04-29 Thread Chris Flav
Hello, I have noticed that when switches are clustered using the cluster xxx mechanism, the cluster members cannot have access-class xx in configured without breaking the cluster rcommand functionality. Is there a way to restrict telnet to these cluster members? Thanks, C. Flav

[c-nsp] ip directed-broadcast access-list

2010-04-29 Thread Michael Costello
Besides the glaringly obvious caveat of smurf attacks, are there any hidden caveats with configuring 'ip directed-broadcast access-list $foo' on Vlan interfaces (something like CEF being affected)? The motivation for enabling this is Wake on LAN. We running 12.2SXF on sup720s in Cat 6500s.

[c-nsp] Native VLAN and DHCP

2010-04-29 Thread Chris Gotstein
I've got a WS-C3560G-24TS switch doing L3. We are running multiple VLANs, each VLAN has it's own subnet, and the clients are getting their IP addresses from a MS DHCP server using ip helper-address command for each VLAN interface. Problem: Setting up HP access points and controller. Want to

Re: [c-nsp] ip directed-broadcast access-list

2010-04-29 Thread Saxon Jones
I've had no problems enabling this on Catalyst 6500 sup720-10G's running 12.2(33)SXH5 for the same purpose as you. We also use it on Catalyst 3750G's running 12.2(52)SE with equally good results. I've done no load testing of it, though, we just have our normal rush of WoL packets (generally 2

Re: [c-nsp] Weird Web Browsing Issues On ADSL Circuit

2010-04-29 Thread Joel M Snyder
I have an ADSL customer who uses a Cisco 1841 CPE for Bonded ADSL. Circuit has worked perfectly for the past one year, but all of a sudden, out of nowhere, web browsing suddenly stopped working! yesterday 99% of the time when we see this symptom (especially since you said it works fine for a

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread eNinja
Let's apply logic... 1 - What changed prior to the 'events'? 2 - What's common to all the impacted devices experiencing the 'events'? Location, vendor, etc 3 - Which other devices could be experiencing similar 'events' but aren't. Eninja On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Mike mike-

Re: [c-nsp] ouch 7204vxr reloaded

2010-04-29 Thread Mike
This is becomming a crisis. The logical problem soliving procedure here is producing no leads or answers, I just have stuff thats beginning to die and experience 'never been seen before' malfunctions all across the network. From today, I have: An adtran ta5000 in a telco collocation

[c-nsp] ASA NAT problem

2010-04-29 Thread Eric Magutu
Hi, Apologies for the cross posting. I have a problem with a NAT on my network. A private IP has been NATed to a public IP on my network. The public IP can't be reached from within my network but it can from outside. I have tried to implement dns doctoring with no success. This is what I have

[c-nsp] VPLS with L3VPN access

2010-04-29 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, I'm trying to get answer to the following question, and so far cisco website hasn't been very helpful (most probably because I don't know the cisco term for the feature). Is it possible on cisco software platforms (like 72xx) to configure a VPLS and somehow connect it to a L3VPN (on the same