Re: [c-nsp] nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives

2010-05-01 Thread Christopher.Marget
T.V. said: If you have an OOB network that requires the 5k mgmt0 ports to be used there, burn one of 1-8 on a 5010 or one of 1-16 on a 5020 as a gig port and do another VRF specially for the peer link. Done. You could certainly send the keepalive traffic on that OOB network, but many OOB

[c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Matteo Abrile
Hi, We have bit confusion because when we use cisco 6500 with mpls + bgp and ospf, if we check tcam we found so: L3 Forwarding Resources FIB TCAM usage: TotalUsed %Used 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 524288 518838 99%

Re: [c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
On 2010-05-01 18:10, Matteo Abrile wrote: We have bit confusion because when we use cisco 6500 with mpls + bgp and ospf, if we check tcam we found so: MPLS by default will assign label to every prefix learned via IGP. Given 226k prefixes were assigned labels, I'd look into configs right

Re: [c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Tim Durack
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Matteo Abrile m.abr...@itelsi.com wrote: Hi, We have bit confusion because when we use cisco 6500 with mpls + bgp and ospf, if we check tcam we found so: L3 Forwarding Resources             FIB TCAM usage:                     Total        Used       %Used  

[c-nsp] R: mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Matteo Abrile
For some reason BGP is leaking prefixes to IGP, or there's some problem with the IGP deployment itself. Now I know reason because bgp goes into mpls route, we use also ibgp between our core router, and as you tell that mpls by default assign label every route learn IGP. What is way to stop learn

[c-nsp] R: mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Matteo Abrile
Do you have Inet in a vrf? We ran into something like this. Try: mpls label mode all-vrfs protocol bgp-vpnv4 per-vrf I try add this command but cisco reply with: This command is an unreleased and unsupported feature :-( ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] ONS 15454E DCC through NSN HiT 7070

2010-05-01 Thread Insan Praja SW
Hi List, Currently I'm configuring a pair of ONS SDH to interconnect via NSN Hit 7070. The circuit is configured successfully between these pair via the NSN cloud, forwarding traffic/frames, but I can't get them together on a single CTC, so I need to managed them through individual CTC per

Re: [c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

2010-05-01 Thread Tim Durack
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Matteo Abrile m.abr...@itelsi.com wrote: Do you have Inet in a vrf? We ran into something like this. Try: mpls label mode all-vrfs protocol bgp-vpnv4 per-vrf I try add this command but cisco reply with: This command is an unreleased and unsupported feature :-(

Re: [c-nsp] ASA NAT problem

2010-05-01 Thread Christopher J. Wargaski
Eric-- To see what the ASA is actually translating, run the show xlate command. Do you have an ACL allowing the inbound traffic to the DNS server? cjw Message: 8 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:45:08 +0300 From: Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Cisco