Re: [c-nsp] Web TV Streaming Solution?

I know VLC can do some cool stuff with video broadcasting through LAN Check this article out: http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/streaming-live-tv.asp HTH Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Fe

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

There's really not enough to go on. You haven't said what type of interfaces are involved or shown the configuration of those interfaces on two sides of a link. Are they Ethernet, SONET, Frame-Relay? My guess is that you don't have your ospf network type correct on your interfaces, but without s

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Sascha, Output show ip ospf  [...] As Peter already said, I was asking for the output of "show ip ospf interface". It will show us whether something like a passive-nterface causes your problem. Thanks Sascha___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.n

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

output show ip ospf Supports only single TOS(TOS0) routes Supports opaque LSA Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Initial SPF schedule delay 5000 msecs Minimum hold time between two consecutive SPFs 1 msecs Maximum wait time between two consecutive SPFs 1 msecs Minimum LSA interv

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

Once upon a time, a very large operator which was previously a Cisco+Juniper shop, bought some Huawei and a few AlcaLu routers. They forgot to notice that Huawei followed original IS-IS spec (RFC 1142) to the letter, including generating LSP Purges when receiving corrupt announcements, which caused

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot join a few multicast groups

On 5/11/2010 6:01 PM, Tony Varriale wrote: > I assume you have clients on the router having the issues. Have you > verified you are seeing the IGMP membership report? Another > troubleshooting step is to do a manual join on an interface > (downstream/loopback/whatever) and see what you get. > >

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

Hi, We have a network with quite a few NE40E (and 80E). They are quite feature reach but in many cases those features are not completely RFC compliant which causes issues. Troubleshooting of those devices is extremely difficult. Debug commands either simply don't exist for a given feature or the r

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

On May 12, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Felix Nkansah wrote: > The customer would have loved to go with Cisco 7609s, but is contemplating > Huawei's because of their low prices. 7600/6500 have serious caveats with regards to NetFlow, uRPF, & ACL construction which eliminate them from serious considerati

Re: [c-nsp] NX-OS - Cisco TrustSec

On 11/05/2010, at 5:31 PM, Erik Witkop wrote: > But all the tags and policies come from the ACS. I could be wrong, but I > don't think it can currently be done locally. Unless something has changed in > the last 2 years or so. we've always had the ability to do CTS crypto or CTS SGT/SGACL manual

Re: [c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

Haha. I know personally that operating VRP is oh so painful (CX-series, though I assume this will translate). Their lack of operational experience in real networks is made apparent by many bugs when things don't go "smoothly." How about the fact that in the version I was using, despite setting M

Re: [c-nsp] NX-OS - Cisco TrustSec

AFAIK, you need to use the secure radius protocol to ACS. The ACS holds all the tags and policies between the tags. The cts device-id syntax that you mention below are in regards to NDAC. The concept of NDAC is to control what network devices can join the network and maybe even check IOS versi

Re: [c-nsp] NX-OS - Cisco TrustSec

On 11/05/2010, at 2:12 PM, Manu Chao wrote: > I need to encrypt L2 trafic over a MAN between 2 Nexus 7K. The feature CTS > seems to be the right feature to use with 802.1x. Correct? > > Question is could we have a local authentication/authorization instead > classical Radius/ACS query/reply since

[c-nsp] Huawei instead of Cisco

Hi, A telco customer is evaluating tender proposals for next-generation Internet POPs planned for deployment this year. Among the bidders is Huawei, who has a very beautiful technical proposal document with great-looking design/platforms. They are positioning their Quidway S9300 terabit routing

[c-nsp] Web TV Streaming Solution?

Hi All, To "informally" permit employees to watch the upcoming soccer world cup without consuming all the bandwidth through the use of web TV, one of my customers came up with this requirement: They want to subscribe to a soccer web TV channel and access it over the Internet by a dedicated PC or

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Hi Shake, On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 00:46 +0300, shake righa wrote: > Sascha, > > Output > show ip ospf [...] You forgot this: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Sascha E. Pollok wrote: > > "sh ip ospf interface .." and/or configuration snippets. = a "show ip ospf interface" might explain the rea

Re: [c-nsp] Cannot join a few multicast groups

I assume you have clients on the router having the issues. Have you verified you are seeing the IGMP membership report? Another troubleshooting step is to do a manual join on an interface (downstream/loopback/whatever) and see what you get. How about some "sh ip mroute count" and "sh ip rpf

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Sascha, Output show ip ospf Routing Process "ospf 64512" with ID Supports only single TOS(TOS0) routes Supports opaque LSA Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Initial SPF schedule delay 5000 msecs Minimum hold time between two consecutive SPFs 1 msecs Maximum wait time between two conse

[c-nsp] NX-OS - Cisco TrustSec

I need to encrypt L2 trafic over a MAN between 2 Nexus 7K. The feature CTS seems to be the right feature to use with 802.1x. Correct? Question is could we have a local authentication/authorization instead classical Radius/ACS query/reply since it is used only for Cisco point-to-point backbone link

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Hello Shake, Having a problem whereby ospf adjacencies are not forming. a debug on ospf ajacencies is also not showing any thing show ip protocols shows ospf as beign identified and as beign configured. have tested by removing any authentication keys but nothing. Running on a cisco 2621 (MPC8

[c-nsp] OSPF Adjacencies

Hi, Having a problem whereby ospf adjacencies are not forming. a debug on ospf ajacencies is also not showing any thing show ip protocols shows ospf as beign identified and as beign configured. have tested by removing any authentication keys but nothing. Running on a cisco 2621 (MPC860) IOS im

Re: [c-nsp] 3750-E + CVR-X2-SFP10G + SFP-10G-SR = disappearing media

> -Original Message- > From: Holemans Wim [mailto:wim.holem...@ua.ac.be] > Sent: 10 May, 2010 23:13 > To: Matthew White (MAWHI); cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 3750-E + CVR-X2-SFP10G + SFP-10G-SR = > disappearing media > > We have a similar setup but with X2 interfaces,

Re: [c-nsp] Routing SSDP for Windows Desktops

No, everything is wide open. Everything works if both machines are on the same subnet. But if i move one machine to a different subnet, i can see the other machine, but it doesn't allow me access. From what I have read on the MS documentation, there must be a mechanism that deny's access if your

Re: [c-nsp] MIB to monitor EoMPLS xconnect

> Is there a MIB to monitor the status of the EoMPLS xconnect as being UP > or DOWN??? > > I can't seem to find the corresponding MIB for this...looked at the MIB > below, but couldn't find it there. Have you checked if CISCO-IETF-PW-MIB suits you? -- Pelle A: Because it messes up the order in

Re: [c-nsp] mpls + ipv4 route

I don't see why it's not supported if there is a document about it... Also some people says that when you enable this feature it cause recirculation on pfc for each packet. I would be happy to hear if its correct or not. Tim Durack wrote: Do you have Inet in a vrf? We ran into something lik

[c-nsp] MIB to monitor EoMPLS xconnect

Hi All, Is there a MIB to monitor the status of the EoMPLS xconnect as being UP or DOWN??? core1#sh mpls l2transport vc Local intf Local circuitDest addressVC ID Status - --- -- -- Gi2/14 Ethernet