Re: [c-nsp] realistic max full bgp peers on a sup720?

Matthew, Just to make sure that the relevant optimization has been done... Check that you have BGP PMTU discovery enabled... What is the MSS of the BGP sessions? This can have a major impact on large table convergence... Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [ma

Re: [c-nsp] realistic max full bgp peers on a sup720?

On May 27, 2010, at 11:37 PM, matthew zeier wrote: > Running into performance issue with a couple 6503/Sup720-3BXL routers with > about 8 or more peers. Each peer's sending a full BGP table. Anemic ppc cpu blues? performance issues? say it aint so! (fwiw, rsp720 is not much of an improvement.

[c-nsp] udlnd nad EoMpls problem

Hi all. Can someone give me a hint on what is pulling my legs. I'm trying to run EoMpls between a vss environment and a std 6500. The module I'm using on the vss is a WS-X6724-SFP nad in the other end I'm using a WS-X6148-GE-TX. The link is a loop between the two local interfaces. I have two oth

[c-nsp] realistic max full bgp peers on a sup720?

Running into performance issue with a couple 6503/Sup720-3BXL routers with about 8 or more peers. Each peer's sending a full BGP table. If a couple peers flap, the box typically stays at 100% long enough to either drop more peers or drop OSPF. Cisco's site is vague, only mentioning 1m v4 rou

Re: [c-nsp] Link Discovery Error

On 28/05/2010, at 12:01 AM, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:45 +0530, jaikar gupta wrote: >> Thanks peter but i want to Know MAC-addresses. > > Then you use BRIDGE-MIB for switches, and RFC1213-MIB for routers. :-) > > Disregarding certain special cases a router will only know M

Re: [c-nsp] BGP ipv6 peers with ipv4 router-ids

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:50:33PM -0700, Christian MacNevin wrote: > Address-family ipv6 > Neighbor 1.2.3.4 activate We tend to "not do that for the production network". One of the reasons: v4 and v6 give protocol resiliency - if the v4 routing is hosed, for whatever reason, I can use v6 t

Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 90, Issue 75

Zzzz --- original message --- From: "cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net" Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 90, Issue 75 Date: 27th May 2010 Time: 4:59:40 pm Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide W

Re: [c-nsp] Link Discovery Error

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:45 +0530, jaikar gupta wrote: > Thanks peter but i want to Know MAC-addresses. Then you use BRIDGE-MIB for switches, and RFC1213-MIB for routers. :-) Disregarding certain special cases a router will only know MAC addresses in combination with IP addresses. It does not (us

Re: [c-nsp] Link Discovery Error

Thanks peter but i want to Know MAC-addresses. Thanks & Regards Jaikar Gupta On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 17:57 +0530, jaikar gupta wrote: > > ipNetToMediaTable contains the entry of all the devices which are > > reachable from the router but i

Re: [c-nsp] sh module csm 2 probe real

On 27-5-2010 13:54, Church, Charles wrote: Looks like maybe it's computing time wrong. That date is surprisingly close to the start of UNIX time, which was Jan 1, 1970. Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Beha

Re: [c-nsp] Link Discovery Error

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 17:57 +0530, jaikar gupta wrote: > ipNetToMediaTable contains the entry of all the devices which are > reachable from the router but i want to know the devices which are > directly connected with the router. You either want MAC-addresses or CDP neighbor information, right? Fo

Re: [c-nsp] Link Discovery Error

Hello Lincoln Dale, ipNetToMediaTable contains the entry of all the devices which are reachable from the router but i want to know the devices which are directly connected with the router. Thanks & Regards Jaikar Gupta On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Lincoln Dale wrote: > On 26/05/2010, at 1

[c-nsp] Cisco 7606 RSP720 - no SVI bit/packets counters

Hi all, Another strange Cisco behavior - or may be unknown one. Creating SVI interface with a lot of traffic passing through - nothing suspicious. Until ... /7606#sh int vlan XXX Vlan537 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is EtherSVI, address is MAC (bia 001c.b0b7.6400) Description: 0449-

Re: [c-nsp] sh module csm 2 probe real

Looks like maybe it's computing time wrong. That date is surprisingly close to the start of UNIX time, which was Jan 1, 1970. Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Sony Scaria Sent: Thursday, May 27, 201

[c-nsp] Nat Issue

i have a cisco router 1841 connected to a network game now online games need some updates work on specific protocols when i connect directly to the up link provider it works fine but through the router i cannot get the updates because of NAT any ideas to overcome this issue

[c-nsp] sh module csm 2 probe real

hello group, Can someone please explain me why it is showing "13:36:47 gmt 06/14/70". I've searched a lot, but i couldnt find any explanation. btw, my switch is sync with precent time. Switch#sh module csm 2 probe real real = 10.106.110.17:53, probe = PROBE-DNS, type = dns, vserver = W-DNST