On 17/07/2010, at 9:58 AM, Aaron Riemer wrote:
Enabled SNMP traps and MAC-notifications and this brought another issue to
my attention. There is a huge amount of mac-flapping going on (not for this
host) but our ESX hosts that have vmnics trunking to both our cores.
The VM guys are sending
Thanks Lincoln.
The server team must be using the Route based on IP hash method then.
All adapters in the NIC team must be attached to the same physical switch
or an appropriate set of stacked physical switches.
Aaron.
-Original Message-
From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:l...@cisco.com]
On 17/07/2010, at 4:55 PM, Aaron Riemer wrote:
Thanks Lincoln.
The server team must be using the Route based on IP hash method then.
All adapters in the NIC team must be attached to the same physical switch
or an appropriate set of stacked physical switches.
also ensure you pay
Yes our setup is cat6k HSRP therefore they will need to change the load balance
method until we move them to nexus VPC (a current project).
Aaron.
Sent from my iPhone
On 17/07/2010, at 4:06 PM, Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com wrote:
On 17/07/2010, at 4:55 PM, Aaron Riemer wrote:
Thanks
On Friday 16 July 2010 07:55:53 am roy wrote:
I should have also specified about 7 full feeds
distributed between them. So, more or less, each would
be taking only ~5 full max. Will NPE-G100 be as much as
an option vs NSE-100?
I've tested an NPE-G2 with about 7 full feeds in the past
Thanks Ryan,
This did the trick.
On 7/17/2010 2:38 PM, Ryan West wrote:
D.J.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of D.J. O'Berry
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 1:46 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Drew Weaver wrote:
So if I make the source one end of a /30 and the destination the other
end of a /30 it could potentially exit the router on the other uplink
interface?
I don't really see how that would affect outgoing packets? Destination
based routing should still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/30/2010 11:30 AM, Devon True wrote:
All:
I am seeing increasing input queue drops on a 7600 running 12.2(33)SRC5
on a SPA-2X1GE in a 7600-SIP-400.
#sh int g1/1/1
GigabitEthernet1/1/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is GigEther
