[c-nsp] Comments about ME switches

2010-08-02 Thread LM
Hi all, I would like to hear comments/experiences -positive and/or negative- about the next switches: ME-3400EG-12CS-M ME-3400E-24TS-M One of the main requirements is the option to have 2 redundant power supplies in each switch and they should be able to replace while the switch is working.

Re: [c-nsp] GSR not switching multicast

2010-08-02 Thread Daniska Tomas
G'morning, shame on me - the issue was wrong (read: normal unicast) L2 dstmac configured on the traffic generator. Lessons learned: What had fooled me was a 7609/ES+ PE sitting between the tgen and the GSR - it was not only forwarding the traffic without any complaints, it didn't even

Re: [c-nsp] Comments about ME switches

2010-08-02 Thread LM
El 02/08/10 10:18, LM escribió: Hi all, I would like to hear comments/experiences -positive and/or negative- about the next switches: ME-3400EG-12CS-M ME-3400E-24TS-M One of the main requirements is the option to have 2 redundant power supplies in each switch and they should be able to

Re: [c-nsp] QPPB on Cisco 3750-ME

2010-08-02 Thread Tóth András
Hi, QPPB is not supported on DSBU switches, like the 3750 series. Andras On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Chris Mason ch...@noodles.org.uk wrote: Hi, I am not having much luck on Google with regards to if this is supported or not, but I currently have a 3750-ME running 12.2(44)SE6 and I

Re: [c-nsp] Comments about ME switches

2010-08-02 Thread Adrian M
Don't know about the E flavor, but the old version (ME-3400G) have small buffers and drops output packets. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/80758 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] Cisco ASR BGP within the box question

2010-08-02 Thread Steven.Glogger
hi all just a short question (related to a quite new feature from cisco). with the new cisco ASR software (15.0(1)S - released some days ago) it is able to do BGP on the same box. we need this feature because we use the VASI interfaces to bring and filter traffic from one VRF to another VRF and

Re: [c-nsp] Comments about ME switches

2010-08-02 Thread LM
ironicThat is great!!/ironic ¬¬ El 02/08/10 13:53, Adrian M escribió: Don't know about the E flavor, but the old version (ME-3400G) have small buffers and drops output packets. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/80758 ___ cisco-nsp

[c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Mohammad Khalil
hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish what other ways i have to do ? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Ziv Leyes
I suggest you do not use a router for such tasks, a router is not a monitoring device. Better fire up a linux box and install one of the many free programs available out there. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
I use fping for ping networks. fping -g On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish what other ways i have to do ? I use fping

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Shimol Shah
Why not reduce the repeat count and timeout. Something like below. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- tclsh foreach address { x.x.x.x y.y.y.y z.z.z.z } { ping $address rep 2 timeout 1 } =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Shimol On 8/2/10 10:21 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: hi all i want to ping

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Mohammad, What about IP SLA? Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 17:21 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Ping Script hi all i want to ping

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi Arie i used IP SLA but i am searching for a more simpler way for this :) Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Ping Script Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 16:49:22 +0200 From: avay...@cisco.com To: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Mohammad, What about IP SLA? Arie -Original

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Aaron
Perl. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:21, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish what other ways i have to do ? ___

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
You could have multiple EEM scripts with a cron policy. They can run in parallel. Not sure how this would be simpler than IP SLA probes... What is complex about IP SLA? Arie From: Mohammad Khalil [mailto:eng_m...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 17:51 To: Arie Vayner (avayner);

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Rodney Dunn
Set up IP SLA ICMP probes? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_sla/configuration/guide/hsicmp.html Rodney On 8/2/10 10:21 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, I suggest you do not use a router for such tasks, a router is not a monitoring device. Better fire up a linux box and install one of the many free programs available out there. ...sure, NAGIOS, smokeping etc - but you can also use IPSLA on the cisco devices too. can be very handy - with

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASR BGP within the box question

2010-08-02 Thread Joe Maimon
I sure hope you have better luck than I did. http://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg20125.html steven.glog...@swisscom.com wrote: hi all just a short question (related to a quite new feature from cisco). with the new cisco ASR software (15.0(1)S - released some days ago)

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Chris Marlatt
On 08/02/2010 10:21 AM, Mohammad Khalil wrote: hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish what other ways i have to do ? fping is a very easy tool for this. You can have it read hosts from a file or

[c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Jon Lewis
I'm having some trouble with policing on a 6500 (sup720-3bxl) on a WS-X6416-GBIC port. The port is supposed to be rate-limited to 40mbit/s. The physical port is configured as a layer 2 port tied to a single vlan (switchport access vlan ...). Egress policing is applied to the SVI port

Re: [c-nsp] Ping Script

2010-08-02 Thread Juan Angel Menendez
Perl + Fork() :) At 11:53 a.m. 02/08/2010, Aaron wrote: Perl. On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:21, Mohammad Khalil eng_m...@hotmail.com wrote: hi all i want to ping several hosts at the same time if i use tclsh scripting i will be waiting for each ping session to finish what other ways i

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Jon Lewis wrote: I'm having some trouble with policing on a 6500 (sup720-3bxl) on a WS-X6416-GBIC port. The port is supposed to be rate-limited to 40mbit/s. The physical port is configured as a layer 2 port tied to a single vlan (switchport access vlan ...). Egress

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Jon Lewis
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Jon Lewis wrote: I'm having some trouble with policing on a 6500 (sup720-3bxl) on a WS-X6416-GBIC port. The port is supposed to be rate-limited to 40mbit/s. The physical port is configured as a layer 2 port tied to a single

[c-nsp] Odd error after Interface flap [GSR/Engine 5]

2010-08-02 Thread Drew Weaver
Howdy, One of our upstream providers had an interface flap for about 10 seconds. After the Interface came back up and before the BGP session came up this message was logged: SLOT 5:Aug 2 14:43:36 EDT: %EE48-3-QM_SANITY_WARNING: Few free buffers(10) are available in ToFab FreeQ pool# 1 Slot

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Kevin Hatem
I'm having some trouble with policing on a 6500 (sup720-3bxl) on a WS-X6416-GBIC port. The port is supposed to be rate-limited to 40mbit/s. The physical port is configured as a layer 2 port tied to a single vlan (switchport access vlan ...). Egress policing is applied to the SVI port i

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Jon, Do you want to police the traffic on the physical port or on the vlan? If on the physical port, apply the policy on the port itself... There is a good chance that in that old IOS there would be a problem with VLAN counters... Arie -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Jon Lewis
I was under the impression that the 6500 can only egress police layer 3 interfaces...thus the output service-policy is on the SVI. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/59889 On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: Jon, Do you want to police the traffic on the physical

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 policing

2010-08-02 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Yes, true. Slipped my mind... Arie -Original Message- From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jle...@lewis.org] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 23:52 To: Arie Vayner (avayner) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6500 policing I was under the impression that the 6500 can only egress police