Check out zenoss http://www.zenoss.com/
- Original Message -
From: "ar"
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 1:01:05 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] OpenSource Cisco Monitoring Tool
Hi. Aside from Nagios, any other opensource monitoring tool you are using that
greatly works
On 8/3/2010 8:01 PM, ar wrote:
Hi. Aside from Nagios, any other opensource monitoring tool you are using that
greatly works for cisco especially 7600 series?
thanks
If you like Nagios but hate its UI, take a look at Opsview Community
version. Its nagios under the covers but with a real
Hi. Aside from Nagios, any other opensource monitoring tool you are using that
greatly works for cisco especially 7600 series?
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
arch
Hi
I just revisited this,and yeah the only 6PE doc I've seen (here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_data_sheet09186a008052edd3.html
) seems to be totally out of date.
Note that this is using 12.2(33)SRD4 on a 7200 platform (Dynamips actually).
The basic syntax t
the way i'm reading that is that source mac 0018.742f.b380 is passing icmp
ttl expired frames.
sending ttl expired icmp messages is a known dos attack.
On 3 August 2010 23:16, sherif mostafa wrote:
>
> Dears,
>
> Could anyone help please as I've faced an error message "DOS" below that
> caused
Dears,
Could anyone help please as I've faced an error message "DOS" below that
caused high CPU usage:
ERROR 08/02/2010 16:22:46 CAI dosProtection: Flow is suspicious:
GigabitEthernet11/0.410 for control protocol: IP TTL Expired source MAC
0018.742f.b380 with rate 241 pps
ERROR 08/02/2010
On 03/08/2010 17:42, aniel wrote:
Hello,
I'm running into an issue where I have a 7204 that is timing out the vty
login page on the client side but not closing the line on router side.
Has anybody run into this issue before? Any ideas where I can start
looking? I've checked the Cisco site.
Chris, Jeff, *
have you managed this to work being CEF switched? Couldn't get past process
path when I tried lately
--
deejay
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Mason
> Sent: Wednesday, July 2
I have seen this issue on the WS-X6704 blades.
When the fiber is first connected, link flaps can cause the
interface to lock up. Sometimes the blade has to be rebooted
to correct the issue.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.ne
I am not sure what the priority of BGP versus SNMP is, plus there is more than
one process involved for the whole task to be done. If SNMP is "eligible" to
take the CPU from BGP and the scheduler is not getting around to it quick
enough then process-max-time could help. If SNMP is not eligible t
Hello,
I'm running into an issue where I have a 7204 that is timing out the vty
login page on the client side but not closing the line on router side.
Has anybody run into this issue before? Any ideas where I can start
looking? I've checked the Cisco site.
--
Aniel Wittig
Network Operations Te
Hello all,
I have a 6509 w/ SUP-720-3BXL. There is nothing truly crazy going on here,
just 4 transit provider BGP sessions over 10 gig links w/ full routing
tables. I have policing in place to allow for the BGP convergence when a
provider comes up or needs to re-converge for whatever reason. I've
Hi,
We are attempting to turn up some 10G links between our Nexus 7k core
and 7606 edge routers. The Nexus 7k uses -SR SFP+, and X2 -SR optics
are present in the WS-X6708 line card. These links did not come up
until the optics in the 7606 were removed and re-inserted. The optics
were in place and
I have seen the same messages recently on several slots after TE tunnels flap,
but they caused a lot of issues (FIA errors, CEF disable and so on).
%EE48-3-QM_SANITY_WARNING: Few free buffers(0) are available in ToFab FreeQ
pool# 3
%EE48-3-QM_SANITY_WARNING: Few free buffers(0) are available in
Hi,
The following configuration will track uplinks and the vPC Peer Link
! Track the vpc peer link
track 1 interface port-channel11 line-protocol
! Track the uplinks to the core
track 2 interface Ethernet1/1 line-protocol
track 3 interface Ethernet1/2 line-protocol
! Combine all tracked objects
David,
Take a look here:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Category:NAT
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipaddr/command/reference/iad_nat.htm
l
(search for match-in-vrf)
Hope this helps.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nethe
One other way to accomplish complex things (such as router
reconfiguration) could be to use EEM:
http://www.cisco.com/go/eem
Also, PfR could help here:
http://www.cisco.com/go/pfr
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
yes
http://www.firstdigest.com/2010/05/cisco-policy-routing-with-ip-sla/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+firstdigest+%28FirstDigest%29
On 03.08.2010 11:45, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Re Rodney and folks on-da-list,
rod...@cisco.com (Rodney Dunn) wrote:
Set up IP SLA ICMP
Re Rodney and folks on-da-list,
rod...@cisco.com (Rodney Dunn) wrote:
> Set up IP SLA ICMP probes?
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_sla/configuration/guide/hsicmp.html
Since I am stupid and you, Rodney, are wise - and all the others
will have to show their hands ;-) - my question:
thanks oliver,
will try and keep you (and the list) updated.
-steven
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboeh...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:06 AM
To: Glogger Steven, SCS-NIT-NIO-PIO-DNW-NEO; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net;
na...@nanog.org
Subject: R
Hi,
Was hoping someone could advise with regards to what the NAT keywords
"match-in-vrf" achieves? We typically use this in production. However, Ive just
been labbing NAT config using VRF lite and it doesnt appear to change behaviour
and Cisco literature is unclear. With or without it, translat
21 matches
Mail list logo
