Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

hi Pelle, It`s 3.6.3 here, thank you very much,now I know it`s coursed by different IOS-XR version release, Stephen.Chen 2010/9/24 Per Carlson > > Note If the regular expression contains spaces, it must be specified and > > surrounded by quotation marks. > > Tying up the some loose ends:

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

hi,Peter, quote-regexp is not accepted in IOX-XR but regexp. Stephen.Chen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Length over RG-6 or RG-59

On 9/22/10 1:31 PM, Peder wrote: > Does anybody have a good rule of thumb as to what type of coax to use for > DS3 over various distances? I know it has to be 75ohm, but have read it can > be RG-59 or RG-6. Also, on the RG-59 I have seen solid core and braided. > We have to run a cable about 250'

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Length over RG-6 or RG-59

I was mistaken; the Cisco cable I have is Belden 9555 RG-59/U. ~Seth - Reply message - From: "Seth Mattinen" Date: Thu, Sep 23, 2010 08:34 Subject: [c-nsp] DS3 Length over RG-6 or RG-59 To: On 9/22/10 10:31 PM, Jon Simola wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Peder wrote: >> Does

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP (summary)

Congrats - glad you've found a solution!! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ASN geographical spread

> I have used internet looking glasses and routeviews but I am actually > looking for an equivalent of “sh ip ASN” (instead of “sh ip route”) where a > certain ASN number’s presence on the internet can be deduced and then > displayed on a geographical map (google maps). > > I think that GeoIP might

Re: [c-nsp] STM querry

> Thanks Aaron , if you have any supporting doc for same it will be very > helpful for me. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=site%3Acisco.com+pa-mc-stm-1+config+guide -- Pelle RFC1925, truth 11:  Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and  a different presentation, regardless of whether

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

> Note If the regular expression contains spaces, it must be specified and > surrounded by quotation marks. Tying up the some loose ends: quoting works fine in 3.9.0 RP/0/0/CPU0:melker#show bgp regexp ^32 NetworkNext HopMetric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.100.0.0/16 1

Re: [c-nsp] prefix list question

Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Deric Kwok wrote: > Can I know what is different between 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 This will permit anything ("inside the /0, up to a /32"). > and 0.0.0.0/0 ? This will permit exactly the default route "network 0.0.0.0, mask /0". gert -- USENET is *not* th

Re: [c-nsp] prefix list question

0.0.0.0/0 = matches the default route 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 = matches all prefixes http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/iproute/command/reference/1rfbgp1.html Chris On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Thank you > > Can I know what is different between 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 and 0.0.0

Re: [c-nsp] prefix list question

Thank you Can I know what is different between 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 and 0.0.0.0/0 ? Thank you again On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Gatlin wrote: > Try this: > > ip prefix-list traffic-in seq 100 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 > > > Chris > > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Deric Kwok >

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP (summary)

And the winner is... ip eigrp summary-address leak-map. I spent all this time focusing on the BGP side (I've been crash-coursing BGP lately), not realizing that the summary-address command had gained new features in the 10 years since I last used it. :) *sigh* In the process, I also found a stup

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:07 +0200, Per Carlson wrote: > > As far as I can tell from the docs[0] the "show bgp regexp" seems to > > accept quotes. Can you verify that by any chance? > > It's in the man page as well: [...] > But in practice, it doesn't work: > > RP/0/7/CPU0:mormor#show bgp regexp "

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

> As far as I can tell from the docs[0] the "show bgp regexp" seems to > accept quotes. Can you verify that by any chance? It's in the man page as well: --8<-- RP/0/7/CPU0:mormor#man command show bgp regexp Note If the regular expression contains spaces, it must be specified and surrounded by q

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 18:50 +0200, Per Carlson wrote: > > I don't have any CRS-1 available, but I can't see why it wouldn't have > > that command. > > At least 3.6.3 and 3.9.0 doesn't have it (from 3.6.3 but same output on > 3.9.0): As far as I can tell from the docs[0] the "show bgp regexp" see

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

Hi. > I don't have any CRS-1 available, but I can't see why it wouldn't have > that command. At least 3.6.3 and 3.9.0 doesn't have it (from 3.6.3 but same output on 3.9.0): RP/0/7/CPU0:mormor#show bgp ? paths Path information policy Preview advertisements un

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

Hi > RP/0/RP0/CPU0:#sh bgp regexp ^$ | Inc ? > LINE   I don't know what XR version you are running, but I get different results on 3.6.3 and 3.9.0. On 3.6.3 I get the same result as you: no matches. RP/0/7/CPU0:mormor#show bgp regexp ^$ | in /30 RP/0/7/CPU0:mormor# But on 3.9.0 it works as

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 00:12 +0800, Hello.Cisco wrote: > u r right,but in IOX-XR,it`s not comfortable. I tried and output > listed bellow: [...] > RP/0/RP0/CPU0:#sh bgp regexp ^$ ? > LINE > RP/0/RP0/CPU0:#sh bgp regexp ^$ | Inc ? > LINE > RP/0/RP0/CPU0:#sh bgp regexp ^$ | I

Re: [c-nsp] prefix list question

Try this: ip prefix-list traffic-in seq 100 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 Chris On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi all > > What is the "ip prefix-list traffic-in seq 100 permit any" > > I can't use it > > Thank you > ___ > cisco-nsp m

Re: [c-nsp] STM querry

The PA-MC-STM-1 only supported SDH and did not support anything greater than E1 last time I checked. . jack daniels wrote: > Hi guys, > > Please help me with understanding if I have channelised STM1 card - > > 1) I can configure 3xDS3 > > 2) I can configure 63xE1 > > CAN I configure on same

[c-nsp] prefix list question

Hi all What is the "ip prefix-list traffic-in seq 100 permit any" I can't use it Thank you ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

hey,Peter u r right,but in IOX-XR,it`s not comfortable. I tried and output listed bellow: RP/0/RP0/CPU0:#sh bgp regexp ^$ BGP router identifier x.x.255.240, local AS number 65142 BGP generic scan interval 60 secs BGP table state: Active Table ID: 0xe000 BGP main routing table versio

Re: [c-nsp] Performance Difference NM-16ESW-1GIG and NME-16ES-1GIG

On 9/23/10 9:05 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > > Pretend > it's like having a 2690 series switch in module form; you are saving > space and combining management into a single device. > Whoops, I meant 2960. It's like an L2 only switch. ~Seth ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Performance Difference NM-16ESW-1GIG and NME-16ES-1GIG

On 9/23/10 2:32 AM, Jeffrey Denton wrote: > Looking at getting a couple of 3945s. NM-16ESW-1GIG is being > recommended by one of my colleagues. He prefers the easy of use, not > having to session in to the module. It's been pointed out that the > router IOS will have to devote some of it's time

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

Jeff, > I interchange BGP with vendors off the vendor switches. > > The internal IGP has a bunch of routes. The vendor mesh has a ip eigrp > summary on its interfaces towards the internal mesh that aggregates the > whole into a /16 (10.200.0.0/16). > > One vendor I need to connect to, I need to

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Length over RG-6 or RG-59

On 9/22/10 10:31 PM, Jon Simola wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Peder wrote: >> Does anybody have a good rule of thumb as to what type of coax to use for >> DS3 over various distances? I know it has to be 75ohm, but have read it can >> be RG-59 or RG-6. > > I've only ever seen Coax 734

Re: [c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 20:57 +0800, Hello.Cisco wrote: > can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" > both ,when I execute "show bgp " in crs-1 I don't know about the CRS-1, but in regular IOS you can. You have to use the "quote-regexp" command though: show ip bgp

[c-nsp] Strange tcam mask

Hi all, Introduction: 1) Catalyst 6500 (SUP-720, 12.2(33)SXI1) is ok: Cat6500#show run int vl ! interface Vlan ip address 192.168.77.1 255.255.255.252 ip access-group in end Cat6500#show access-lists Extended IP access list 10 permit udp any host 192.168.77.2 eq dom

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

Might be possible to advertise the /16 via the network command and then use bgp aggregate to only send out the /24. Haven't tested this, not sure if you can aggregate into a smaller network. It's just a suggestion. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

> > > > > I can't just pull the EIGRP summary at the boundary without causing all > > sorts of other fun. > > Is the problem that when you try to summarise to /24 and /16, the /16 > blocks the /24 ? > You should be able to do both - it would still be legal - I think this > is what you need to inves

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

Why not use the EIGRP leak map feature (IOS version dependent)? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gt_esflr.html On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Jeff Bacon wrote: > This is probably stup

Re: [c-nsp] BFD for monitoring? (was BFD expectations)

I think ethernet OAM would be a better bet for this specific use case. Esp if you are on SXI. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps368/prod_white_paper0900aecd804a0266.html On Thu, Sep

Re: [c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

> One vendor I need to connect to, I need to advertise a specific /24 > (10.200.16.0/24) to the eBGP neighbor. OF course BGP won't advertise the > route to the eBGP neighbor because the /24 isn't in IGP, only the /16 > summary. I don't think your going to have much luck. What you are asking, it to

[c-nsp] BFD for monitoring? (was BFD expectations)

> Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:19:57 -0400 > From: Chris Evans > To: Phil Mayers > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BFD expectations > Message-ID: >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Phil you bring up a great point. Until sxi bfd code was c

[c-nsp] advertising a route not in IGP

This is probably stupid, but I've pawed the books and I can't find a decent answer. I have two meshes - a "vendor" mesh and an "internal" mesh, both EIGRP, different ASes. I interchange BGP with vendors off the vendor switches. The internal IGP has a bunch of routes. The vendor mesh has a ip

[c-nsp] can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both , when I execute "show bgp "

hi guys, can I use | pipe line such as "| inc xxx" and regexp such as "regexp ^$" both ,when I execute "show bgp " in crs-1 thanks Stephen.Chen ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 10G DWDM UP/DOWN

Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:42:15PM +0200, Geert Nijs wrote: > Just a small question, maybe off topic: is a 10GE DWDM circuit always > composed of 4 x 2.5 Gbps channels, because i was thinking that classical > dwdm consisted of 32x 2.5 Gbps channels. You can do 10GE DWDM with 1x 10Gbps just fi

Re: [c-nsp] SIP not working behind NAT

Several problems with SIP and NAT check bug toolkit for that IOS at cisco.com El 22/09/10 10:41, Bikash Bhattarai escribió: Dear all, I have just configured a Cisco 1811 with c181x-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T10. If I put my ATA on public IP it works fine but if I put behind NAT it doesn't wo

Re: [c-nsp] 10G DWDM UP/DOWN

Just a small question, maybe off topic: is a 10GE DWDM circuit always composed of 4 x 2.5 Gbps channels, because i was thinking that classical dwdm consisted of 32x 2.5 Gbps channels. regards, Geert 2010/9/23 Good One > > I don't have the ability to see the DWDM stats but we have configured our

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec => Speed problems ?

Try using 1360, I *think* this is the Cisco standard, either way we use that without problem. Cheers Mike Company Registration number: 197807;Place of Registration: England; Registered office address: Weybridge Business Park, Addlestone Road, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 2UP Confid

Re: [c-nsp] 10G DWDM UP/DOWN

I don't have the ability to see the DWDM stats but we have configured our end with "hold-down up 5000" (ms), this means wavelengths is fluctuating with small amount of time. Yeah, sometimes other wavelengths went down parallel but it's not the case always. The interesting things is, most of the

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec => Speed problems ?

> Speed, the customer said that slow and a lot of disconnect on application. > Do you know if my MTU is correct ? (mss fix and other) ? The easiest way to check for MTU is to ping the other end, dont-fragment and mess about with the packet size. Because there are so many different things going on

[c-nsp] Performance Difference NM-16ESW-1GIG and NME-16ES-1GIG

Looking at getting a couple of 3945s. NM-16ESW-1GIG is being recommended by one of my colleagues. He prefers the easy of use, not having to session in to the module. It's been pointed out that the router IOS will have to devote some of it's time to the module and perform the switching functions.

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec => Speed problems ?

Speed, the customer said that slow and a lot of disconnect on application. Do you know if my MTU is correct ? (mss fix and other) ? 2010/9/22 Heath Jones : >> i request your help because we have a problems of speed between two >> site. > > What is the problem, exactly? >

Re: [c-nsp] QoS on the 2960

This should work. This is the way I did bandwith management on a 3750, policing on ingress and srr-queue bandwith limit on egress. The problem with Internet users and TCP is policing. As soon as a packet exceeds the limit it drops it. And TCP has to resend, and then you have the TCP sliding windo

Re: [c-nsp] BFD expectations

Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:38:16PM +1000, Oliver Eyre wrote: > While on the subject, does anyone know if BFD for SVIs has been fixed yet? If I remember right, it's announced for "SX", to be released in early 2011 or so. It's not in SXI4. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of W

Re: [c-nsp] BFD expectations

Probably only CWAN cards will be able to offload the cpu. DFCs, as far as i remember, cannot generate packets. -- Tassos Pete Lumbis wrote on 23/09/2010 05:11: The forwarding on the 6k can be decentralized but as of today I believe that BFD is still a centralized process. That is, it is punted