Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Wonder if anyone uses those kind of converter and how reliable are they? I have a FDDI hand off. I use a Cisco Catalyst 5500 for this purpose (and to translationally bridge from FDDI to Gigabit Ethernet). The cheap solution, back in the day, was to

Re: [c-nsp] SDM templates

Hi, 1) If all TCAM resources are allocated for a particular feature, further entries will be stored in software, therefore packets hitting those entries will be processed in software (IOW punted to CPU). SDM templates are just repartitioning the TCAM space to be divided in another way among differ

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Luan Nguyen wrote: Ah, glad you brought that up. I was looking into a FDDI to Fast Ethernet converter: http://www.data-connect.com/RAD_AMC-101.htm Wonder if anyone uses those kind of converter and how reliable are they? I have a FDDI hand off. I use

[c-nsp] SDM templates

Ok, stupid questions about SDM. When I issue a 'sh sdm prefer' I see that my 3560 is using the "desktop default" template. When I issue 'sh sdm prefer routing' I see that I get less MACs and more IPV4 routes. This all begs the questions: 1. Is this showing me what resources are allocated to the

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Ah, glad you brought that up. I was looking into a FDDI to Fast Ethernet converter: http://www.data-connect.com/RAD_AMC-101.htm Wonder if anyone uses those kind of converter and how reliable are they? I have a FDDI hand off. Regards, -Luan On Thu, Oc

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Luan Nguyen wrote: I guess I have to look into buying a 7200 as well. Not knowing your situation or needs, would it make more sense to replace the FDDI gear with something that speaks Ethernet? jms ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Luan Nguyen wrote: Anyone has a FDDI PA VIP2 card for the 7200VXR series router that I can buy? VIPs are (were) the carrier cards that would let you run 7200 port adapters in a 7500 series router. Your best bet for finding what you need would probably be either ebay or

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Thanks guys. I guess I have to look into buying a 7200 as well. Regards, -Luan On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Luan Nguyen wrote: > > Hi folks, >> >> Anyone has a FDDI PA VIP2 card for the 7200VXR series router that I can >> buy? >> > > FDDI i

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Luan Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, Anyone has a FDDI PA VIP2 card for the 7200VXR series router that I can buy? FDDI is not supported on the VXR afaik (only the non-VXR). VIP2 is 7500. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/ts/fn/000/fn3028.html Background When port adaptors without th

Re: [c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Hi, On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:00:51PM -0400, Luan Nguyen wrote: > Anyone has a FDDI PA VIP2 card for the 7200VXR series router that I can > buy? I think I'd like to see a video of you trying to stuff a VIP2 into a 7200... :) Of course there's the PA-F-* cards for the 7200, *but* Cisco says the

[c-nsp] Change routing if path delay increases ( was Re: Assurared BW to customer)

Hello, Although not identical but I feel like facing a similar problem in nature. We have two sites connected over two providers SP_A and SP_B. Both can take a route which is geographically short (let's name it "short path"). SP_A also can take the alternative path which is considerably longer

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

At 09:00 AM 10/28/2010, Mack McBride uttered: The 6748-SFP use one Rohini for even and one Rohini for odd ports not consecutive, IIRC. This could vary by revision. I don't have one handy to check against. The Janus and SSA are for ports 1-24 and 25-48. It's even/odd all the way back to the f

[c-nsp] FDDI card for 7200 VXR

Hi folks, Anyone has a FDDI PA VIP2 card for the 7200VXR series router that I can buy? Thanks. -Luan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/c

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

Ahh. I was looking at the block diagram for the GE-TX and just assumed it was the same for SFP. Thanx for the correction. -Ben On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Tim Stevenson wrote: On the fiber (SFP) card, ports are indeed mapped in groups of 12 consecutive odd/12 consecutive even ports per r

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Tim Stevenson wrote: > On the fiber (SFP) card, ports are indeed mapped in groups of 12 consecutive > odd/12 consecutive even ports per rohini, with 24 odd ports on one janus & > 24 even ports on the other. > > I'd guess you're just running out of replication band

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

Actually on this card one Janus handles the even ports, and the other handles the odd ports. Jim -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben Lovell (belovell) Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 11:38 AM To: John Neib

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

Must be haunted. Try it again after Halloween. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:54 PM, John Neiberger wrote: > This is a good one. I'm working with TAC on it, but I thought i'd > share it here, too, just because it's so unusual. We're seeing > intermittent drops on a multicast video stream and we hav

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

The 6748-SFP use one Rohini for even and one Rohini for odd ports not consecutive, IIRC. This could vary by revision. I don't have one handy to check against. The Janus and SSA are for ports 1-24 and 25-48. There are four Rohini on the board, two connected to each Janus/SSA pair. You can use 'sh

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9000 and IPSEC

The problem with 7600 is the limited throughput of the IPSEC module for SPA-600. It would require a grand total of 16 IPSEC modules in 8 SPA-600 carriers to achieve throughput goals... Rubens On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Lovell wrote: > I was not aware that there was an IPSEC blade

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

On the fiber (SFP) card, ports are indeed mapped in groups of 12 consecutive odd/12 consecutive even ports per rohini, with 24 odd ports on one janus & 24 even ports on the other. I'd guess you're just running out of replication bandwidth. A bit more detail about the traffic pattern etc would

Re: [c-nsp] pixhelp

Hey Deric: > -Original Message- > From: Deric Kwok [mailto:deric.kwok2...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:45 PM > To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost; tn...@internode.com.au > Cc: Cisco Network Service Providers > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] pixhelp > > Hi > > The verion is Cisco PI

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

Can you see the far end in your arp table? On 10/28/2010 1:46 AM, Manaf Al Oqlah wrote: Hi, I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below. everything seems to be working fine as my virtual circuit is UP but my problem is that I cant ping IP address CE02 from CE01 PC01---CE

Re: [c-nsp] ASR-9000 and IPSEC

I was not aware that there was an IPSEC blade for the 9K like there is for the 7600. If there is not then obviously your would need to put something like an ASA in-line but then it should work fine. -Ben On Oct 27, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: After reading ASR-9000 specs no CCO, s

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

My 3750ME foo is slowly fading, but are those ports Enhanced ports ? Only the enhanced ports can be MPLS uplinks. Rubens On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Manaf Al Oqlah wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have established an EoMPLS circuit on ME3750 switches as below. everything > seems to be working fine

Re: [c-nsp] Fun problem affecting only even-numbered ports

Nothing that I can think of. One Super Santa Anna and Janus run ports 1-24 and another pair of them run ports 25-48. One Rohini runs each consecutive group of 12 ports. The only thing I could guess at is the path take across the switchbar fabric but I don't recall how we select FPOE right n

Re: [c-nsp] VLAN-based EoMPLS

In "show mpls l2transport vc 100 detail" do you see packet counters (send/receive) incrementing on either side? What IOS version are you running? Can you post the output from that command from each PE. -Ben On Oct 28, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Manaf Al Oqlah wrote: Hi, I have established an EoM

Re: [c-nsp] Routing performance of ME3400

> -Original Message- > From: Garry [mailto:g...@gmx.de] > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:22 AM > To: Eric Van Tol > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Routing performance of ME3400 > > On 27.10.2010 16:42, Eric Van Tol wrote: > > Hello, > > Check your SDM template - y

[c-nsp] IOS upgrade on 6500 yields wacky result.

I noticed that one of our 6500s was running 12.2(17d)SXB and I wanted to upgrade it to SXI3. I did my normal procedure of changing the boot variables and then reloading the slave, the slave booted into SXI3 normally so I then forced switchover to the slave and the old-master rebooted and came u

Re: [c-nsp] Routing performance of ME3400

On 27.10.2010 16:42, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hello, > Check your SDM template - you probably have it set to 'layer-2' when it > should be 'default' for layer 3 routing. Customer confirmed ... did some more performance tests, switch is now operating at decent performance ... :) Thanks again for the

Re: [c-nsp] Are these DWDM optics compatible?

On 10/27/2010 4:38 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > Here is the ITU 100 GHZ grid. > > http://www.telecomengineering.com/downloads/DWDM%20ITU%20Table%20-%20100 > %20GHz.pdf > > ITU 52 is 35.82. Whether or not it will work at .92 is moot, IMO. I > would tell your vendor to give you optics th