On Wednesday, November 24, 2010 03:50:07 am Gert Doering
wrote:
> "IGP" could be "iBGP + no-export". "Whatever interiour
> routing is used".
Figured as much. Fair point :-).
> We actually do that (and we're not happy - BGP is far too
> limited for proper internal route control, things like
> "
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Lobo wrote:
>
>
> On 11/23/2010 6:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> Can't think of why this would be an issue.
>> The longest distance we have today between two iBGP
>> neighbors is 160ms (and soon, the farthest we'll have will
>> be about 230ms), and that has no prob
On Nov 23, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> All,
>
> When the 12.2(33) train came out for 6500 (SXI) I got quite excited by the
> possibilities of building a "quicksave" system[1] on top of:
>
> archive log config persistent save
>
> ...and the associated stuff in IOS. I didn't have tim
On 23/11/2010 19:21, Peter Rathlev wrote:
The best thing would be if one could just limit the number of allowed
MAC addresses on a port, forcing the port err-disabled if the limit is
crossed. Whenever I look at port-security it seems to address a lot of
other "problems", and that tends to complic
I'd suspect MTU issues here.
Cheers,
Mark.
It's looking like it somehow might be related to that. For a test, we
set the mtu on the toro-router2's interfaces back to 1500 from 9216.
After that was done, the sessions to the vanc routers both came up!
Strange because we didn't change any of the
On 11/23/2010 6:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Can't think of why this would be an issue.
The longest distance we have today between two iBGP
neighbors is 160ms (and soon, the farthest we'll have will
be about 230ms), and that has no problems at all.
I'd suspect MTU issues here.
Cheers,
Mark.
It
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:43:11PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 09:13:58 pm Gert Doering
> wrote:
>
> > - customer has PI, wants *us* to announce it, no other
> > ISP involved -> we announce their /24 (e.g.), have a
> > static null-route for that, and all interio
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 09:28:39AM -0500, Randy McAnally wrote:
> I just set up a downstream customer using us as (1) of his multiple upstreams
> and I didn't set up a static null route, so that way I only advertise his
> prefix to our upstreams if he's announcing it to us. For our own prefix
All,
When the 12.2(33) train came out for 6500 (SXI) I got quite excited by
the possibilities of building a "quicksave" system[1] on top of:
archive log config persistent save
...and the associated stuff in IOS. I didn't have time to look into it,
and before I do I thought I'd ask here - is
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:48 +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 23/11/2010 18:30, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > Also include "spanning-tree bpduguard enable" wherever possible. STP
> > BPDUs have no place on access ports.
>
> This should be accompanied by a generous helping of the "port security"
> comma
Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
>> why don't you use:
>>
>> switchport mode access
>> switchport access vlan 402
>> switchport voice vlan 498
>
> Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
> special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
> portfast setting w
Hi guys,
Any one can help me with understanding - if SPA-1CHOC3-CE-ATM can be
channelised to DS3 or not ?
I have to choose chanelised STM1 card on SIP 400 (cisco 7600) , which
card to choose ( which can channelise to E1 , DS3 )
Regards
___
cisco-nsp ma
On 23/11/2010 18:30, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:30 +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with work
I think that you are missing the "switchport voice vlan 498"
configuration statement. Here is an example of a port on a 3560 with a
Cisco IP phone.
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 22
srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
queue-set 2
priori
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132
http://blog.palehorse.net/2009/08/24/using-windows-7-with-multiple-gateways-and-dhcp/
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Tom wrote:
> Does anyone know when you would specify multiple default routers in a
> dhcp pool? How would a client know which router to use?
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:30 +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> > switchport mode access
> > switchport access vlan 402
> > switchport voice vlan 498
>
> Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
> special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
> portfast s
23.11.2010 18:36, Elmar K. Bins пишет:
After a lot of fiddling around and getting nowhere, I'll ask you :)
I am trying to set up a test port - for an IP phone actually - with
the office WS VLAN (402) native untagged, and the Voice VLAN (498)
tagged on this 3560-48 (12.2(25)SEE4).
My config look
Hello,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
I am trying to set up a test port - for an IP phone actually - with
the office WS VLAN (402) native untagged, and the Voice VLAN (498)
tagged on this 3560-48 (12.2(25)SEE4).
My config looks like this:
#sh run int f0/44
interface FastEthernet0/4
Re guys,
thanks for all the answers, all pointing in the two relevant directions ;)
> why don't you use:
>
> switchport mode access
> switchport access vlan 402
> switchport voice vlan 498
Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
special constructs normally. But - t
Hello,
You should add the vlan 402 in the "trunk allowed vlan" list of your int
f0/44.
Regards,
David
2010/11/23 Elmar K. Bins
> After a lot of fiddling around and getting nowhere, I'll ask you :)
>
> I am trying to set up a test port - for an IP phone actually - with
> the office WS VLAN (4
You need to allow vlan 402 as well as vlan 498.
You should also be able to use the 'switchport voice vlan' command without the
switchport trunk commands.
Mack
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behal
I would remove "switchport access vlan 402" from the config as I do not
believe it's actually used with the switchport is in trunk mode.
I think your primary error is that you do not include vlan 402 in your
allowed VLAN list.
switchport trunk native vlan 402
switchport trunk allowed vlan 402,498
After a lot of fiddling around and getting nowhere, I'll ask you :)
I am trying to set up a test port - for an IP phone actually - with
the office WS VLAN (402) native untagged, and the Voice VLAN (498)
tagged on this 3560-48 (12.2(25)SEE4).
My config looks like this:
#sh run int f0/44
interface
Hi all,
I have problems configuring fax machine using cisco 2821 with FXS port and
E1 line. Could you give me an advice where to read about this more. I need a
configuration example. Fax machine is connected to FXS port.
Regards,
Yavor
___
cisco-nsp ma
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 09:13:58 pm Gert Doering
wrote:
> - customer has PI, wants *us* to announce it, no other
> ISP involved -> we announce their /24 (e.g.), have a
> static null-route for that, and all interiour routing
> happens on the two /25s.
>
>customer network is at all time
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:54:37 am Lobo wrote:
> The interfaces on both sides are all set to 9216 mtu but
> the path between them is a lot less than that. Another
> thing that a colleague of mine pointed out was that the
> distance between these routers might be something to
> look at. Th
Hi All,
lets say i have 2 devices connected directly with one link:
Cisco 1841 F0/0 Cisco 3750 F0/24
When i mirrored the traffic between these 2 devices using SPAN i see many
EIGRP packets and CFM frames going from the
3750 switch to the Cisco 1841.
CFM and EIGRP are not configured on the Cis
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:45:47AM -0500, Randy McAnally wrote:
> What if the customer wants to stop announcing through you? Isn't your config
> basically a permanent announcement?
If we do BGP with a customer, we don't nail down the announcement at
our side (because if we did, we'll blackho
> Is this just changing the daughter card? Or is it a completely new blade?
It's a new blade (new NPU's)
> What's the list prices of these updates?
30 k$
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/list
If it is a new blade, what does this mean:
"Migration from Cisco ACE10 or ACE20 to Cisco ACE30
Customers that have an existing Cisco ACE10 or ACE20 Module can migrate to a
Cisco ACE30 Module based on a Throughput license purchased with the Cisco
ACE10 or ACE20 Module, using one of the three part
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:06:49PM -0800, Mark Kent wrote:
> The "internal" router redistributes static routes into ospf,
> so I introduce changes by alternating between:
>
> internal(config)#ip route 192.0.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.10
>
> and
>
> internal(config)#no ip route 192.0.2.0 25
31 matches
Mail list logo
