Re Nick,
n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard) wrote:
Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with workstations...
This isn't a special construct:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:33 +0100, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
This isn't a special construct: it's the recommended way to handle
cisco voip phones with desktop ethernet support.
Sure, but: This is not a Cisco phone. It works nonetheless, so CDP
seems to not be really necessary. Further testing
So, C1800 series routers nominally support a maximum of 128M external flash
(CF). Will 256M flash cards work at all, or will they do something silly
like refusing to boot?
128M CF cards have become less easy to get these days, and I'm not inclined
to pay a discounted $700 for the cisco
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Nick Hilliard wrote:
So, C1800 series routers nominally support a maximum of 128M external flash
(CF). Will 256M flash cards work at all, or will they do something silly
like refusing to boot?
128M CF cards have become less easy to get these days, and I'm not inclined
On 23/11/10 20:57, Jared Mauch wrote:
The next-gen sup can't come out soon enough IMHO, as you know the
s720 is quite long in the tooth. the same goes for all the IOS
infrastructure behind it. You should make sure you talk to the right
people in NSSTG about the fact that you actually care
On 24/11/2010 11:13, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
When I last inserted a larger than 128M CF card into a 12.2(24)T2 running
1841 it crashed and rebooted and then failed to boot properly.
So no, as far as I know, it's not supported and it actually doesn't work.
meh, annoying. For some reason,
On 24/11/2010 13:04, Erik Soosalu wrote:
Don't hot insert the flash - *bad* things happen. Always insert with
the router powered down, but 2GB cards work fine.
interesting. Anyway, turns out my local supplier does 128M flash cards at
the right price on special order; they're just not
hi all
if i have congested link and i want to dedicate percent of the congested BW to
a specific subnet what is the best way to do that
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
if i have congested link and i want to dedicate percent of the congested
BW to a specific subnet what is the best way to do that
Without knowing what hardware and software that is involved it's
impossible to say.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail:
Don't hot insert the flash - *bad* things happen. Always insert with
the router powered down, but 2GB cards work fine.
rt-02#sh ver
Cisco 1841 (revision 7.0) with 118784K/12288K bytes of memory.
2 FastEthernet interfaces
1 ATM interface
DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
On 11/23/2010 5:13 PM, Eric Oosting wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com
mailto:loboti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/23/2010 6:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Can't think of why this would be an issue.
The longest distance we have today between two
hi all
i have Cisco 7606-S router with c7600s72033-advipservices-mz.122-33.SRD4.bin
operating system
when i try to modify some extended access lists i am prombted for example that
the statement is duplicated (actually does not exist) or remving some lines and
after checking its still
nothing to mention man
i have Cisco SCE 2020 in place
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:43:41 +0100
From: swm...@swm.pp.se
To: eng_m...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BW dedication
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
i have Cisco SCE in place
Why would you send this only to me
On 2010-11-24 14:04, Erik Soosalu wrote:
Don't hot insert the flash - *bad* things happen. Always insert with
the router powered down, but 2GB cards work fine.
Unless you're not doing writing to NVRAM/flash it's actually OK.
The 1841 doesn't support voice so there's no threat it will try
to
On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Lobo wrote:
On 11/23/2010 5:13 PM, Eric Oosting wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Lobo loboti...@gmail.com
mailto:loboti...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/23/2010 6:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
Can't think of why this would be an issue.
On 11/24/10 1:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Re Nick,
n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard) wrote:
Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike
special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the
portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with
Last time I checked the CDP neighbours on one of our access switches with
Polycoms attached they showed up as CDP neighbours, didn't look into it
though
On 24 Nov 2010, at 16:52, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 11/24/10 1:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
Re Nick,
n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard)
On 11/24/10 9:04 AM, David Rothera wrote:
Last time I checked the CDP neighbours on one of our access switches with
Polycoms attached they showed up as CDP neighbours, didn't look into it
though
Yep, they support both CDP and LLDP. Earlier versions of the firmware
only support CDP
i have looked into GNS3 but it does not support VPLS simulation
is there anyway i can simulate VPLS ?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Hi,
We have an existing POP with 7200(G2) and a 3560 - The POP is growing a lot
quicker than anticipated, and we have had to add another 3560 to accommodate
new client eth connections...the 2nd 3560 is connected via PortChan to the 1st
3560(Not ideal).
Before the POP becomes unmanageable,
Hello,
I am trying to setup my ASA to do authentication for VPN useres, where
specific group-policy will be assigned based on the AD group membership.
I know this can be achieved though the below commands:
ldap attribute-map CISCOMAP
map-name memberOf IETF-Radius-Class
map-value memberOf
Sorry, the bold did not stick the first go around:
*map-value memberOf CN=Test Users,OU=PlaceHolder,OU=Outside
Contacts,OU=xedixxx,DC=xxxrite,DC=local*
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Jason Charlton jasonch...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I am trying to setup my ASA to do authentication for
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Lukasz Bromirski wrote:
I also don't understand why the 1841 rebooted while inserting flash,
but I'm also using 2GB SanDisks and they're working fine.
Strange. It rebooted (and wouldn't boot from it) when inserting a larger
than 128M flash (I tried a few), but not with
23 matches
Mail list logo
