Anybody know of a way to make XMODEM work over telnet/ssh? For a Sup720
stuck in ROMMON that is. I know it's almost always much faster to just
get a CF card with the right image, but this problem has me
interested. :-)
I'm connecting remotely (reverse telnet) to the AUX port of some 1841.
The AUX
Hi all,
Just having a small question.
For a customer solution we want to mix an ASA5550 with an ASA5520.
Is it possible to have the devices in a HA/failover pair where the 5550 will
be forced to be primary? I can't find information about it on the Cisco website.
Thanks in advance
Tim
Sent
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807dac5f.shtml#intro
Steve
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 19:12, Tim Vollebregt t.vollebr...@leaseweb.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just having a small question.
For a customer solution we want to mix an ASA5550 with
Hello Tim:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Tim Vollebregt wrote:
Hi all,
Just having a small question.
For a customer solution we want to mix an ASA5550 with an ASA5520.
Is it possible to have the devices in a HA/failover pair where the 5550 will
be forced to be primary? I can't find
Halo all,
I understood that ACL on int's were transitting traffic and ACL on line was
to the router?
I ask because I could not access router until I add my home IP on acl 101
(the inbound)
Is this because the external interface fe0 has inbound rules applied?
For example, fe1 is to our network
I used to use Dialout/EZ a while ago, it creates a virtual COM port to a
reverse telnet session. You can use your favorite terminal app to do the
X/Y/Zmodem stuff. Worked like a charm
--
deejay
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
Or just for fun, you can use two routers and create an aux-to-aux tunnel over
ssh/telnet, so you can use the serial port on your PC as if the device was
local to you ;-)
--
deejay
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
Sorry for third post
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Daniska
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:23 AM
To: 'Peter Rathlev'; cisco-nsp
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] XMODEM transfer over telnet/ssh, any chance?
I used to use Dialout/EZ a while ago, it creates a virtual COM port to a
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:25 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
Or just for fun, you can use two routers and create an aux-to-aux
tunnel over ssh/telnet, so you can use the serial port on your PC as
if the device was local to you ;-)
I'll try that, it doesn't sound at all impossible that it will work.
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:22 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
I used to use Dialout/EZ a while ago, it creates a virtual COM port to
a reverse telnet session. You can use your favorite terminal app to do
the X/Y/Zmodem stuff. Worked like a charm
I'm afraid I don't have any Windows machines to use
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:30 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
Sorry for third post
No problem for me. :-)
re your problem with special characters - there are several ranges of
TCP ports for the rev telnet.
The standard 2xxx range is telnet interpreted. One of the higher
ranges is 8-bit raw, you
In your case, fe0 is the outside world, the untrusted world, the acl 101 you
applied in fe0 filters any packet that is coming from the outside world into
your router, no matter where exactly it goes later.
The acl 1 applied in the line vty filters traffic that is trying to connect to
the router
Send them over, I think I can find what to do with them... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Nakamura
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:45 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2951 memory upgrade
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:42 +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:25 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
Or just for fun, you can use two routers and create an aux-to-aux
tunnel over ssh/telnet, so you can use the serial port on your PC as
if the device was local to you ;-)
I'll
Meh, couldn't get that to work either. I still get NAKs on the XMODEM
transfer from within minicom, which uses lszrz. I also tried starting a
completely seperate process with sx file.bin /dev/ttyUSB0
/dev/ttyUSB0 but still no luck.
I followed this guide to configure the AUX tunnel:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:00:08AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Anybody know of a way to make XMODEM work over telnet/ssh? For a Sup720
stuck in ROMMON that is. I know it's almost always much faster to just
get a CF card with the right image, but this problem has me
interested. :-)
The Xmodem
On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote:
I'm really starting to
wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual
switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ...
So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet interfaces, both facing the
same switched network?
This came and went on a sup720 3bxl on SXI5. It didn't fail over to slave and
didn't drop any traffic either...all lights are still green. TCAM corruption?
3w1d: %CONST_DIAG-SP-3-HM_TEST_FAIL: Module 6 TestSPRPInbandPing consecutive
failure count:5
3w1d: %CONST_DIAG-SP-6-HM_TEST_INFO: CPU
On 15/12/10 13:13, Ian Henderson wrote:
On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote:
I'm really starting to wonder whether we're the only ones on this
earth still using a dual switch config for our routers for
redundancy purposes ...
So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet interfaces,
I have a question regarding redundancy protocols on the 7600. Here is my
scenario:
1 - 7609-S
2 - Sup720-3BXL
2 - 3560's switches
What I would like to do is configure a GLBP group and have both SUP's be a
member. One SUP to one 3560 and the other to the second 3560. The 3560 are
tied together
On 15/12/10 14:00, Randy McAnally wrote:
This came and went on a sup720 3bxl on SXI5. It didn't fail over to slave and
didn't drop any traffic either...all lights are still green. TCAM corruption?
The module might need re-seating.
Having said that, I've seen bugs on SXI causing spruious RPC
On 15/12/10 16:00, Kevin Warwashana wrote:
I have a question regarding redundancy protocols on the 7600. Here is my
scenario:
1 - 7609-S
2 - Sup720-3BXL
2 - 3560's switches
What I would like to do is configure a GLBP group and have both SUP's be a
member.
There may be a misconception
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 13:19 +0100, Christian Deckelmann wrote:
The Xmodem recovery procedure is not supported in Supervisor 720.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_tech_note09186a008015bfa1.shtml#s720recover
Isn´t this no longer true?
Ah. That means we can't use
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 12:27 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
you mentioned you didn't have a Windows box available, there seem to
be a couple solutions for bsd/*nix available, as per
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COM_port_redirector
If I had a Linux box next to every device I would have no
I understand the SUP active/standby, but the ports on the standby SUP are
capable of being up and route traffic.
I will take a look into using a VLAN or the backup interface route.
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:00:03PM -0500, Kevin Warwashana wrote:
I understand the SUP active/standby, but the ports on the standby SUP are
capable of being up and route traffic.
Yes, but it's not an independent router. It's just more ports of the
*single* active router.
(As opposed to
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 19:56 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
I understood that ACL on int's were transitting traffic and ACL on line was
to the router?
Unfortunately not; the interface ACL is applied before the router finds
out if the packet is destined for itself or not, so you need the
interface
On 15.12.2010 08:29, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
Garry,
It could be related to CSCth59072 Backup interface up instead of
standby which affects the ASR1K.
The latest 15.0(1)S version (03.01.02.S.150-1.S2) should have the fix...
Not sure about the exact extent of this bug, but I'm not having
I've just made some tests with A4(1.0) and A3(2.6) and I verified that the
ACE4710 uses NTPv2.
Can anyone confirm this ?
I'm asking this because I have a customer where the ACE only synchronizes
with a Stratum 1 Server but not with a Stratum 2 Server. Maybe there is no
relation between the two
On 15/12/2010 19:22, Antonio Soares wrote:
I've just made some tests with A4(1.0) and A3(2.6) and I verified that the
ACE4710 uses NTPv2.
ntp stratum 2 or ntp version 2? I hope ntp version 4, as that's the
current version as of 2004. ntp version 2 dates back to 1989.
NTP stratum 2 is
On 15.12.2010 14:13, Ian Henderson wrote:
On 15/12/2010, at 1:54 AM, Garry wrote:
I'm really starting to
wonder whether we're the only ones on this earth still using a dual
switch config for our routers for redundancy purposes ...
So you're using backup interface for two Ethernet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COM_port_redirector
If I had a Linux box next to every device I would have no problems. What
I would like was to use the (C2800 based) terminal servers we already
have/plan to have in place in every PoP. Having the XMODEM capability
would be nice, but not at
NTPv2. This is what I see in a router with debug ntp packet detail
configured with ntp master 2:
Dec 15 20:21:55.694: NTP message received from 10.10.10.254 on interface
'FastEthernet0/0' (10.10.10.1):
Dec 15 20:21:55.694:
NTP Header:
Leap = 00, Version = 2, Mode = 3,
Stratum = 3,
Poll
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 20:20 +, Tomas Daniska wrote:
I meant, there are pieces of software similar to Dialout/EZ for *NIX,
that is - you have the remote router (1841 was it?) with aux connected
to the console of the failed box at the remote location, and you setup
a virtual ttySx on your
34 matches
Mail list logo
