[adding the list]
So none of the routes are being installed on RouterA from the BGP
table into the RIB? all the routes are marked as RIB failure in the
BGP table of RouterA?
I remember there being a debug that will show you why a route isn't
installed into the routing table from BGP, but I can't
In addition to the manual route map method there are also appliances such as
internap and F5 link controller that will you to match your bgp metrics more
closely to the traffic traversing your AS. I think the internap supports
dynamic metric changes based in traffic flow.
Sent from my iPhone
On 12/22/10 2:33 PM, RAZ MUHAMMAD wrote:
> I would appreciate if someone can shed some further light on using the
> default route or full routing table scenario while multi homed. In this case
> hardware is not an issue, I am trying to assess the operational,
> differences, or the outcome in terms
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 16:33, RAZ MUHAMMAD wrote:
> Unfortunately the vendor does not support multipath or anything similar on
> their platform.
As you asked on a Cisco list, you got a response on what can be done
with Cisco equipment - use multipath.
You might try asking the vendor if they hav
Hi Roger,
Thanks for your response.
Unfortunately the vendor does not support multipath or anything similar on
their platform. I am left with usual BGP attribute manipulation tricks, such
as weight or local AS preference. Our eBGP router is multi-homed and is
getting full Internet routing table fr
1. Tune your IGP to your desired level of convergence (SPF timers, etc).
2. Use BFD with your IGP
3. Use LDP IGP-Sync or LDP Session Protection.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michael Robson
Sent: Wednesday
hi,
heres a nice random open question suitable for this time of year
whats the maximum entries on an ACL for a VLAN before
devices on that VLAN start to get a degredation of performance..
specifically multicast traffic ?
..this'd be on a 6500 with Sup720 3BXL - but no DFCs
alan
___
On 2010-12-22, at 5:08 AM, Michael Robson wrote:
> If I configure BFD for each link and also attach it to OSPF and repeat the
> experiment, the time to re-route is still 6-7 seconds.
>
> I can reason that this might work or that it shouldn't: does this not work
> because there is no direct ho
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:08 +, Michael Robson wrote:
> I then have two clients connected one to router A and the second to
> router B with an EoMPLS pseudowire connecting them (the pseudowire is
> terminated against the same loopback of the 6500s used for the BGP
> peerings).
[...]
> If I confi
I have a test network of three Cisco 6500(Sup720s) running SXI5 connected
together in a triangle. Each is iBGPed to the others using loopbacks advertised
around this testbed using OSPF and Label switching is also turned on. I then
have two clients connected one to router A and the second to rout
10 matches
Mail list logo
