Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

Dear joe, Consider using L2TPv3. I have tested L2TPv3 and works well for bridging, even with do1q trunks. Regards, Bikash On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Todd Shipway < t...@newfrontierssolutions.com> wrote: > I've got this working good over multiple bridged MLPPP connections. There > was a t

Re: [c-nsp] Router Loosing Encapsulation on Subinterfaces

If you are using IPSec tunnels on routers, use Version 15.0(1)M2. It addresses some bugs. Otherwise, yes, it is quite stable. cjw > Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:16:43 +0100 > From: Gert Doering > To: Righa Shake > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router Loosing Encapsulation on

Re: [c-nsp] S Vlan/ C Vlan Problem

any link or doc how to achieve this ? On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Arie Vayner wrote: > I assume that you are asking about allocating the C-Vlans as S-Vlans... The > general answer is yes. > It may have some implications on specific hardware, but I am not directly > aware of any... > Arie >

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

I've got this working good over multiple bridged MLPPP connections. There was a thread on this previously when I had some issues with it. You basically need to use a BVI interface with the bridge to get things to work properly. Sample config that helped me get this working is below. R1/R2:

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 as border router

Hello Anyone had experience using ASR 9000 as a P router? BR On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 27/12/2010 00:58, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > >> It now has operationally useful NetFlow support, which is key for an edge >> device. >> > > mostly. Still has some problems with

[c-nsp] redistribute routes leaked from another VRF?

OK, I'm reaching, I know. Let's suppose Cisco device (6500 SXH/SXI), with VRF Alpha and VRF Beta defined. BGP 400 is running in VRF Alpha, learning routes from somewhere else. OSPF pid 200 is running in VRF Beta, various other routes, several OSPF neighbors. Set up import map, and import a ha

Re: [c-nsp] S Vlan/ C Vlan Problem

I assume that you are asking about allocating the C-Vlans as S-Vlans... The general answer is yes. It may have some implications on specific hardware, but I am not directly aware of any... Arie On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:37 PM, jack daniels wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm stuck in a problem where- > >

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

What about multilink frame relay instead of multilink ppp? - Original Message - From: "Herro91" To: "Lee" Cc: "Cisco-nsp" Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:04 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP Have you considered a pseudowire (either L2TPv3, or MPLS-based)? This w

[c-nsp] S Vlan/ C Vlan Problem

Hi Guys, I'm stuck in a problem where- I'm Service provider ( MEN) network ...imposing S-Vlan S1-vlan 100 - Cvlans 1,2,3 S2-vlan 200 - Cvlan 11,22,33 Can I give out Vlans 1,2,3,11,22,33 on a single port Regards Jack ___ cisco-nsp mailing lis

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

Have you considered a pseudowire (either L2TPv3, or MPLS-based)? This would make things a little simpler IMHO, assuming your 3620's support the feature. On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Lee wrote: > Have you tried it without the 'bridge irb'? > It sounds like you want to bridge IP between the tw

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

I replied to the poster privately, but L2TPv3 should handle this requirement pretty easily. It will bridge the two over an L3 which could be MLPPP. Andrew On Tuesday, December 28, 2010, Mike wrote: > On 12/27/2010 07:51 PM, Joe Freeman wrote: > > I've got a situation where a customer is having

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

On 12/27/2010 07:51 PM, Joe Freeman wrote: I've got a situation where a customer is having to relocate from one facility to another a few miles away. This customer has a 100Mb metro ethernet connection at the old location, and can't get it moved for several months. To help them out, we're tryin

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Passive Optical Networks Documentation

Thanks to you all for your comments, but frankly my questions have yet to be answered. I asked for appropriate documentation on PON and recommendation of some good PON equipment vendors. Much as google has helped me find some docs on the subject, your individual experience and exposure is best at

Re: [c-nsp] Bridging ethernet to MLPPP

Have you tried it without the 'bridge irb'? It sounds like you want to bridge IP between the two sites and I think integrated routing & bridging is going to want to route IP.. Regards, Lee On 12/27/10, Joe Freeman wrote: > I've got a situation where a customer is having to relocate from one > f

Re: [c-nsp] Router Loosing Encapsulation on Subinterfaces

Hi, On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 03:00:40PM +0300, Righa Shake wrote: > Cisco 7204VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of > memory. > 4 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.7 > IOS Image is c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-4.XD7.bin Common lore says "don't use IOS versions with too many

Re: [c-nsp] Router Loosing Encapsulation on Subinterfaces

Cisco 7204VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory. 4 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.7 IOS Image is c7200p-advipservicesk9-mz.124-4.XD7.bin The encapsulation disappears from both the startup and running configs This is occurring unpredictably. On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Passive Optical Networks Documentation

On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:02:02 am Jared Mauch wrote: > Make sure you also check out the regular Ethernet stuff > too. There are cheap 10-20km bidi sfps that will run on > a single strand. Makes more sense in most cases to keep > it Ethernet vs something else. Well, GPON will run Ethernet