Hi,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 06:39:36PM +, Michael Sokolov wrote:
I have no idea if Cisco ever made anything like this - can someone else
on this list (someone from Cisco maybe) clue us in on this?
There's a NM for the 2600 series that will do IMA - AFAIR it's called
something like
stumbled on 7500/7200 port adapter which does 8 T1/E1 IMA:
Product Number
Description
PA-A3-8T1IMA
Eight-port T1 ATM port adapter with IMA
PA-A3-8E1IMA
Eight-port E1 ATM port adapter with IMA
taken from:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:11:43AM -0500, Rich Davies wrote:
stumbled on 7500/7200 port adapter which does 8 T1/E1 IMA:
Oh, wow. Thanks, learned something new today.
(Not that I'd want to do that - the whole setup Telco delivers a DS3,
some of the T1 in there are ATM and you need IMA to
You could get a mux unit for your install. Have them deliver a channelized
ds3 yo your site and break it out to t1s on your prem again.
On Jan 31, 2011 10:23 AM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:11:43AM -0500, Rich Davies wrote:
stumbled on 7500/7200 port
I think that's what I'll probably have to do because it doesn't look like
there's a good all-in-one solution.
Thanks,
-Nick Voth
From: Chris Evans chrisccnpsp...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:01:08 -0500
To: Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
Cc: nv...@estreet.com,
Sooo, does it have to be Cisco???
I am currently helping a customer with a very similar situation, and I think
based on what you're trying to do here, you should look outside of what
Cisco can offer you. In my mind this is a perfect fit for a Brocade NetIron
CER 2000 switch/router. It can take in
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Kotlerewsky
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 9:08 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Router/switch recommendations for colocation
Sooo, does
Why would there be a need to forklift? If the box will not do peering via
IPv6, then modify the CAM profile to allocate more memory for IPv4, and that
takes care of 500+K IPv4 routes. The key thing here is how many routes are
held in the FIB, which holds the best routes after BGP machine runs
Not peer via IPv6? Really? And, given what we have experienced with the v4
routing table bloat, I can't imagine that moving to v6 will change operators'
tendencies to deaggregate. It just means we have more space to do it.If
you check the v6 table today, you will already see lots of
I'll agree that folks certainly don't follow the BGP-advertisement
best-practices, but some of the stuff you see in IPv6 advertisements today
are still folks experimenting with the protocol. ISPs themselves need to
police this in regards to how they allow their customers to peer with them,
and
Personally? I would look at your favorite *nix and Bird, but that's just me.
J The 2900 also looks to fit well in this niche. I'm also a big fan of
separating my edge routing from my core, so I would look at a router like the
2900 for the edge and then lighter L3 intelligence in the core.
Why would there be a need to forklift? If the box will not do peering
via IPv6, then modify the CAM profile to allocate more memory for IPv4,
and that takes care of 500+K IPv4 routes. The key thing here is how many
routes are held in the FIB, which holds the best routes after BGP
machine runs
Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002?
The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real
information is followed :
hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html
I am looking to find out how to input
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:22:28AM -0800, David wrote:
If the box will not do peering via IPv6,
I strongly recommend this to all my competitors.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert
___
Two /8s allocated to APNIC from IANA (39/8 and 106/8)
___
Dear Colleagues
The information in this announcement is to enable the Internet
community to
On 1/31/11 9:56 PM, Andrew K. wrote:
Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002?
The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real
information is followed :
hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html
On 1/31/11 9:56 PM, Andrew K. wrote:
Does anyone have any experience purchasing this license for an ASR1002?
The Cisco site does not offer much information about it, the only real
information is followed :
hxxp://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-447652.html
17 matches
Mail list logo
